Paper · 2007 · DergiPark (Istanbul University)

Genetic Identification of Diploid and Tetraploid Wheat Species with RAPD Markers

Rami̇̇z Ali̇̇yev; Mehraj Abbasov; Alamdar Mammadov

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
31
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The genetic diversity of 10 diploid and tetraploid wheat species was estimated using random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers. Two species from diploid [Triticum boeticum (wild), Triticum monococcum] and five from tetraploid wheats [Triticum dicoccoides var. arabicum (wild), Triticum dicoccum var. farrum, Triticum dicoccum var. atratum, Triticum durum var. hordeiforme (Bereketli 95), Triticum durum var. leucurum (Sharq), Triticum turgidum var. alboyadurum, Triticum turgidum var. salomonis and Triticum persicum] were included for the analyses. Jacard's cluster analysis algorithm was used to determine genetic similarities. There were two main classes in dendrogram: the varieties [T. boeticum, T. dicoccoides var. arabicum, T. dicoccum var. farrum, T. dicoccum var. atratum, T .durum var. hordeiforme (Bereketli 95), T. durum var. leucurum (Sharq)] assembled in one group and the species [T. monococcum, T. turgidum var. alboyadurum, T. turgidum var. salomonis and T. persicum] in another. The same genotypes were also assessed in field conditions for structural analyses, which were carried out based on eight yield components. The dendrogram created was comparatively analyzed with the RAPD dendrogram. There were differences between genetic and phenotypic similarity of the studied accessions. Results indicated that some of genetically similar genotypes were different phenotypically.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RAPD analysis separated wheat accessions into two main groups.

Outcome
two main classes in dendrograme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were two main classes in dendrogram: the varieties [T. boeticum, T. dicoccoides var. arabicum, T. dicoccum var. farrum, T. dicoccum var. atratum, T .durum var. hordeiforme (Bereketli 95), T. durum var. leucurum (Sharq)] assembled in one group and the species [T. monococcum, T. turgidum var. alboyadurum, T. turgidum var. salomonis and T. persicum] in another.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–1007 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genetic and phenotypic similarity patterns differed among the wheat accessions.

Outcome
differences between genetic and phenotypic similaritye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were differences between genetic and phenotypic similarity of the studied accessions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1223–1314 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some genetically similar genotypes were phenotypically different.

Material
genotypese0
Outcome
different phenotypicallye0
Direction
differente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“some of genetically similar genotypes were different phenotypically.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1406 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54 · show in text ↑