Paper · 2010 · Weed Technology

Adventitious Presence: Volunteer Flax (Linum usitatissimum) in Herbicide-Resistant Canola (Brassica napus)

Amit J. Jhala; Lisa L. Raatz; Jody E. Dexter; et al.

9
claims
13
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Flax is in the process of development as a crop for bio-industrial and nutraceutical products predicated on the use of genetic modification. Before genetically modified (GM) flax is commercially released, effective management practices should be developed to minimize adventitious presence (AP) of GM volunteer flax in subsequent crops. Field research was conducted at four locations during 2007 and 2008 in central Alberta to quantify and mitigate AP of volunteer flax in glufosinate-resistant (GR) and imidazolinone-resistant (IR) canola. A single preplant application of glyphosate at 1,250 g ae ha −1 in GR canola reduced volunteer flax density from 54 to 3 plants m −2 and seed production from 5,963 to 233 seeds m −2 . Similarly, the recommended rate of POST glufosinate (600 g ai ha −1 ) alone effectively controlled volunteer flax and reduced flax seed viability to < 8% and AP to 0.2%. A combination of preplant (glyphosate) and POST (glufosinate) at recommended rates reduced volunteer flax seed production, yield, and AP to near zero in GR canola. Glyphosate applied preplant was equally effective in IR canola, reducing volunteer flax density from 56 to 2 plants m −2 , and seed production from 5,571 to 472 seeds m −2 . Imazamox + imazethapyr applied POST at all the rates poorly controlled volunteer flax and, even in combination with preplant glyphosate, cannot be recommended for control of flax volunteers in IR canola.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preplant glyphosate reduced volunteer flax density in GR canola from 54 to 3 plants m −2.

Material
GRe0
Treatment
glyphosate at 1,250 g ae ha −1e0
Interactor
volunteer flaxe0weed
Outcome
volunteer flax densitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
3 plants m −2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A single preplant application of glyphosate at 1,250 g ae ha −1 in GR canola reduced volunteer flax density from 54 to 3 plants m −2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–673 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preplant glyphosate reduced volunteer flax seed production in GR canola from 5,963 to 233 seeds m −2.

Treatment
glyphosate at 1,250 g ae ha −1e1
Interactor
volunteer flaxe1weed
Outcome
seed productione0
Direction
reducede1
Value
233 seeds m −2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed production from 5,963 to 233 seeds m −2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–722 · show in text ↑
e1

“A single preplant application of glyphosate at 1,250 g ae ha −1 in GR canola reduced volunteer flax density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–648 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

POST glufosinate reduced volunteer flax seed viability to < 8% in GR canola.

Treatment
POST glufosinate (600 g ai ha −1 )e0
Interactor
volunteer flaxe0weed
Outcome
flax seed viabilitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
< 8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“POST glufosinate (600 g ai ha −1 ) alone effectively controlled volunteer flax and reduced flax seed viability to < 8% and AP to 0.2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–893 · show in text ↑
t0

“Adventitious Presence: Volunteer Flax (Linum usitatissimum) in Herbicide-Resistant Canola (Brassica napus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

POST glufosinate reduced adventitious presence to 0.2% in GR canola.

Treatment
POST glufosinate (600 g ai ha −1 )e0
Interactor
volunteer flaxe0weed
Outcome
APe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
0.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“POST glufosinate (600 g ai ha −1 ) alone effectively controlled volunteer flax and reduced flax seed viability to < 8% and AP to 0.2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–893 · show in text ↑
t0

“Adventitious Presence: Volunteer Flax (Linum usitatissimum) in Herbicide-Resistant Canola (Brassica napus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined preplant glyphosate and POST glufosinate reduced volunteer flax seed production, yield, and AP to near zero in GR canola.

Treatment
preplant (glyphosate) and POST (glufosinate)e0
Interactor
volunteer flaxe0weed
Outcome
volunteer flax seed production, yield, and APe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
near zeroe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A combination of preplant (glyphosate) and POST (glufosinate) at recommended rates reduced volunteer flax seed production, yield, and AP to near zero in GR canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1057 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preplant glyphosate reduced volunteer flax density in IR canola from 56 to 2 plants m −2.

Treatment
Glyphosate applied preplante0
Interactor
volunteer flaxe0weed
Outcome
volunteer flax densitye0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
2 plants m −2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glyphosate applied preplant was equally effective in IR canola, reducing volunteer flax density from 56 to 2 plants m −2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1179 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preplant glyphosate reduced volunteer flax seed production in IR canola from 5,571 to 472 seeds m −2.

Treatment
Glyphosate applied preplante0
Interactor
volunteer flaxe0weed
Outcome
seed productione0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
472 seeds m −2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glyphosate applied preplant was equally effective in IR canola, reducing volunteer flax density from 56 to 2 plants m −2 , and seed production from 5,571 to 472 seeds m −2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1230 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

POST imazamox plus imazethapyr poorly controlled volunteer flax in IR canola.

Treatment
Imazamox + imazethapyr applied POSTe0
Interactor
volunteer flaxe0weed
Outcome
volunteer flaxe0
Direction
poorly controllede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Imazamox + imazethapyr applied POST at all the rates poorly controlled volunteer flax”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1318 · show in text ↑
t0

“Adventitious Presence: Volunteer Flax (Linum usitatissimum) in Herbicide-Resistant Canola (Brassica napus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors do not recommend POST imazamox plus imazethapyr, even with preplant glyphosate, for controlling volunteer flax in IR canola.

Treatment
preplant glyphosatee0
Interactor
flax volunteerse0weed
Outcome
control of flax volunteerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“even in combination with preplant glyphosate, cannot be recommended for control of flax volunteers in IR canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1435 · show in text ↑

glyphosate · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

glufosinate · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

glufosinate · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

glyphosate · organism · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Imazethapyr · organism · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

imazamox · organism · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.