Paper · 2004 · Acta Agronomica Hungarica

Stress tolerance responses of two cotton cultivars exposed to ultraviolet-A (366 nm) radiation: photosynthetic performance and chemical constituents

M. K. H. Ebrahim

17
claims
45
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The stress tolerance responses of two Egyptian cotton cultivars (Giza 45 and 86) exposed to various doses (40, 80, 160 and 320 min) of artificial ultraviolet-A (366 nm) radiation were investigated. The seed germination of Giza 86 was promoted at 40 min, but substantially inhibited at 80 and 160 min and completely suppressed at 320 min. However, the seed germination of Giza 45 was progressively inhibited by UV-A exposure and ceased at 160 min, so doses of 40 and 80 min were selected for further studies. In contrast to seed germination, the seedling growth of Giza 86 was negatively affected at 40 min. UV-A stress induced a great reduction in the leaf carbohydrates as well as in the viability and dry mass production of the shoots of both cultivars, but the response was comparatively higher in Giza 45. It also decreased the chorophyll (Chl) and carotenoid contents, coupled with an increase in the Chl a/b ratio, diminished the Hill reaction activity, and quenched the Chl a fluorescence both in the presence and absence of 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea, suggesting an inhibitory effect on the water-splitting system (donor side) as well as on the electron transport from the primary to the secondary acceptors of PSII (acceptor side). These changes reflect a disturbance in the structure, composition and function of the photosynthetic apparatus as well as the sensitivity of PSII to UV-A stress. Nucleic acids (DNA and RNA) were markedly damaged by exposure to UV-A for 80 min, while both cultivars developed adaptive mechanisms for damage moderation. These mechanisms involved increasing the levels of flavonoids, total lipids and total soluble proteins as well as having smaller, thicker leaf blades. Since Giza 86 showed a comparatively higher level of adaptation, it tolerates UV-A stress better than Giza 45. Abbreviations: Car, carotenoids; Chl, chlorophyll; DCMU, 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea; DCPIP, 2,6-dichlorophenol indophenol; DNA, deoxyribonucleic acid; d.m., dry mass; f.m., fresh mass; PSII, photosystem II; RNA, ribonucleic acid; TSP, total soluble proteins; UV-AR, ultraviolet-A (366 nm) radiation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-A radiation at 40 min promoted seed germination of Giza 86 cotton.

Material
Giza 86e2
Treatment
ultraviolet-A (366 nm) radiatione1
Outcome
seed germinatione2
Direction
promotede2
Qualifier
at 40 mine2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two Egyptian cotton cultivars (Giza 45 and 86)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“artificial ultraviolet-A (366 nm) radiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–178 · show in text ↑
e2

“The seed germination of Giza 86 was promoted at 40 min, but substantially inhibited at 80 and 160 min and completely suppressed at 320 min”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 198–336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-A radiation at 80 and 160 min substantially inhibited seed germination of Giza 86 cotton.

Material
Giza 86e2
Treatment
ultraviolet-A (366 nm) radiatione1
Outcome
seed germinatione2
Direction
inhibitede2
Qualifier
at 80 and 160 mine2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two Egyptian cotton cultivars (Giza 45 and 86)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“artificial ultraviolet-A (366 nm) radiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–178 · show in text ↑
e2

“The seed germination of Giza 86 was promoted at 40 min, but substantially inhibited at 80 and 160 min and completely suppressed at 320 min”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 198–336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-A radiation at 320 min completely suppressed seed germination of Giza 86 cotton.

Material
Giza 86e2
Treatment
ultraviolet-A (366 nm) radiatione1
Outcome
seed germinatione2
Direction
completely suppressede2
Qualifier
at 320 mine2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two Egyptian cotton cultivars (Giza 45 and 86)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“artificial ultraviolet-A (366 nm) radiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–178 · show in text ↑
e2

“The seed germination of Giza 86 was promoted at 40 min, but substantially inhibited at 80 and 160 min and completely suppressed at 320 min”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 198–336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-A exposure progressively inhibited seed germination of Giza 45 cotton and stopped it at 160 min.

Material
Giza 45e3
Treatment
UV-A exposuree3
Outcome
seed germinatione3
Direction
progressively inhibitede3
Qualifier
ceased at 160 mine3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two Egyptian cotton cultivars (Giza 45 and 86)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–80 · show in text ↑
e3

“the seed germination of Giza 45 was progressively inhibited by UV-A exposure and ceased at 160 min”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 347–445 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-A radiation at 40 min negatively affected seedling growth of Giza 86 cotton.

Material
Giza 86e4
Treatment
ultraviolet-A (366 nm) radiatione1
Outcome
seedling growthe4
Direction
negatively affectede4
Qualifier
at 40 mine4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two Egyptian cotton cultivars (Giza 45 and 86)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“artificial ultraviolet-A (366 nm) radiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–178 · show in text ↑
e4

“the seedling growth of Giza 86 was negatively affected at 40 min”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–605 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-A stress greatly reduced leaf carbohydrates in both cotton cultivars.

Treatment
UV-A stresse5
Outcome
leaf carbohydratese5
Direction
reductione5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two Egyptian cotton cultivars (Giza 45 and 86)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–80 · show in text ↑
e5

“UV-A stress induced a great reduction in the leaf carbohydrates as well as in the viability and dry mass production of the shoots of both cultivars, but the response was comparatively higher in Giza 45”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–808 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-A stress reduced viability and dry mass production of the shoots of both cotton cultivars.

Treatment
UV-A stresse5
Outcome
viability and dry mass production of the shootse5
Direction
reductione5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two Egyptian cotton cultivars (Giza 45 and 86)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–80 · show in text ↑
e5

“UV-A stress induced a great reduction in the leaf carbohydrates as well as in the viability and dry mass production of the shoots of both cultivars, but the response was comparatively higher in Giza 45”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–808 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The UV-A response was comparatively higher in Giza 45 cotton.

Material
Giza 45e5
Treatment
UV-A stresse5
Outcome
responsee5
Direction
highere5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two Egyptian cotton cultivars (Giza 45 and 86)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–80 · show in text ↑
e5

“UV-A stress induced a great reduction in the leaf carbohydrates as well as in the viability and dry mass production of the shoots of both cultivars, but the response was comparatively higher in Giza 45”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–808 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-A stress decreased chlorophyll and carotenoid contents in cotton.

Treatment
UV-A stresse5
Outcome
chorophyll (Chl) and carotenoid contentse6
Direction
decreasede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two Egyptian cotton cultivars (Giza 45 and 86)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–80 · show in text ↑
e5

“UV-A stress induced a great reduction in the leaf carbohydrates as well as in the viability and dry mass production of the shoots of both cultivars, but the response was comparatively higher in Giza 45”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–808 · show in text ↑
e6

“It also decreased the chorophyll (Chl) and carotenoid contents, coupled with an increase in the Chl a/b ratio, diminished the Hill reaction activity, and quenched the Chl a fluorescence both in the presence and absence of 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea, suggesting an inhibitory effect on the water-splitting system (donor side) as well as on the electron transport from the primary to the secondary acceptors of PSII (acceptor side)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–1252 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-A stress increased the Chl a/b ratio in cotton.

Treatment
UV-A stresse5
Outcome
Chl a/b ratioe6
Direction
increasee6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two Egyptian cotton cultivars (Giza 45 and 86)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–80 · show in text ↑
e5

“UV-A stress induced a great reduction in the leaf carbohydrates as well as in the viability and dry mass production of the shoots of both cultivars, but the response was comparatively higher in Giza 45”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–808 · show in text ↑
e6

“It also decreased the chorophyll (Chl) and carotenoid contents, coupled with an increase in the Chl a/b ratio, diminished the Hill reaction activity, and quenched the Chl a fluorescence both in the presence and absence of 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea, suggesting an inhibitory effect on the water-splitting system (donor side) as well as on the electron transport from the primary to the secondary acceptors of PSII (acceptor side)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–1252 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-A stress diminished Hill reaction activity in cotton.

Treatment
UV-A stresse5
Outcome
Hill reaction activitye6
Direction
diminishede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two Egyptian cotton cultivars (Giza 45 and 86)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–80 · show in text ↑
e5

“UV-A stress induced a great reduction in the leaf carbohydrates as well as in the viability and dry mass production of the shoots of both cultivars, but the response was comparatively higher in Giza 45”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–808 · show in text ↑
e6

“It also decreased the chorophyll (Chl) and carotenoid contents, coupled with an increase in the Chl a/b ratio, diminished the Hill reaction activity, and quenched the Chl a fluorescence both in the presence and absence of 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea, suggesting an inhibitory effect on the water-splitting system (donor side) as well as on the electron transport from the primary to the secondary acceptors of PSII (acceptor side)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–1252 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-A stress quenched Chl a fluorescence in cotton, with and without DCMU.

Treatment
UV-A stresse5
Outcome
Chl a fluorescencee6
Direction
quenchede6
Qualifier
both in the presence and absence of 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylureae6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two Egyptian cotton cultivars (Giza 45 and 86)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–80 · show in text ↑
e5

“UV-A stress induced a great reduction in the leaf carbohydrates as well as in the viability and dry mass production of the shoots of both cultivars, but the response was comparatively higher in Giza 45”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–808 · show in text ↑
e6

“It also decreased the chorophyll (Chl) and carotenoid contents, coupled with an increase in the Chl a/b ratio, diminished the Hill reaction activity, and quenched the Chl a fluorescence both in the presence and absence of 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea, suggesting an inhibitory effect on the water-splitting system (donor side) as well as on the electron transport from the primary to the secondary acceptors of PSII (acceptor side)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–1252 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-A stress appears to inhibit the water-splitting system (donor side) and electron transport to the secondary acceptors of PSII in cotton.

Treatment
UV-A stresse5
Outcome
inhibitory effect on the water-splitting system (donor side)e6
Qualifier
electron transport from the primary to the secondary acceptors of PSII (acceptor side)e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two Egyptian cotton cultivars (Giza 45 and 86)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–80 · show in text ↑
e5

“UV-A stress induced a great reduction in the leaf carbohydrates as well as in the viability and dry mass production of the shoots of both cultivars, but the response was comparatively higher in Giza 45”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–808 · show in text ↑
e6

“It also decreased the chorophyll (Chl) and carotenoid contents, coupled with an increase in the Chl a/b ratio, diminished the Hill reaction activity, and quenched the Chl a fluorescence both in the presence and absence of 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea, suggesting an inhibitory effect on the water-splitting system (donor side) as well as on the electron transport from the primary to the secondary acceptors of PSII (acceptor side)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–1252 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-A exposure for 80 min markedly damaged nucleic acids in cotton.

Treatment
exposure to UV-A for 80 mine7
Outcome
Nucleic acids (DNA and RNA)e7
Direction
markedly damagede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two Egyptian cotton cultivars (Giza 45 and 86)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–80 · show in text ↑
e7

“Nucleic acids (DNA and RNA) were markedly damaged by exposure to UV-A for 80 min”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1416–1496 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both cotton cultivars under UV-A stress increased levels of flavonoids, total lipids and total soluble proteins.

Treatment
UV-A stresse5
Outcome
levels of flavonoids, total lipids and total soluble proteinse2
Direction
increasinge2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two Egyptian cotton cultivars (Giza 45 and 86)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–80 · show in text ↑
e5

“UV-A stress induced a great reduction in the leaf carbohydrates as well as in the viability and dry mass production of the shoots of both cultivars, but the response was comparatively higher in Giza 45”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–808 · show in text ↑
e2

“These mechanisms involved increasing the levels of flavonoids, total lipids and total soluble proteins as well as having smaller, thicker leaf blades”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1572–1721 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both cotton cultivars under UV-A stress developed smaller, thicker leaf blades.

Treatment
UV-A stresse5
Outcome
leaf bladese2
Direction
smaller, thickere2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two Egyptian cotton cultivars (Giza 45 and 86)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–80 · show in text ↑
e5

“UV-A stress induced a great reduction in the leaf carbohydrates as well as in the viability and dry mass production of the shoots of both cultivars, but the response was comparatively higher in Giza 45”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–808 · show in text ↑
e2

“These mechanisms involved increasing the levels of flavonoids, total lipids and total soluble proteins as well as having smaller, thicker leaf blades”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1572–1721 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Giza 86 cotton tolerates UV-A stress better than Giza 45.

Material
Giza 86e3
Treatment
UV-A stresse3
Outcome
tolerates UV-A stresse3
Direction
bettere3
Comparator
Giza 45e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two Egyptian cotton cultivars (Giza 45 and 86)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–80 · show in text ↑
e3

“Since Giza 86 showed a comparatively higher level of adaptation, it tolerates UV-A stress better than Giza 45”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1723–1832 · show in text ↑

radiation · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 4 positive, 5 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

uv · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 6 positive, 7 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

uv · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 1 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

uv · physiology: osmolytes · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

uv · molecular: metabolites · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.