Paper · 2010 · Weed Technology

Effect of Pendimethalin Formulation and Application Rate on Cotton Fruit Partitioning

Darrin M. Dodds; Daniel B. Reynolds; Jonathan A. Huff; et al.

13
claims
25
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Because of the development of glyphosate-resistant weed species, the lack of new herbicide chemistry, and the late-season emergence of annual grass species, efforts are underway to expand the use of currently available herbicides for use in cotton. Field studies were conducted in 2005 and 2006 to evaluate the effect of POST-applied pendimethalin formulation and application rate on cotton fruit partitioning. Oil- and water-based pendimethalin formulations as well as S -metolachlor were applied to cotton that had four true leaves. All pendimethalin and S -metolachlor applications included glyphosate for broad-spectrum weed control. Pendimethalin formulation and application rate had no effect on seed-cotton partitioning to horizontal fruiting zones, on second- or third-position horizontal fruiting sites, or on monopodial branches. However, increased seed-cotton partitioned to plants that had lost apical dominance was observed when the water-based pendimethalin formulation was applied at rates of 1.7 kg ai/ha and higher as well as when the oil-based pendimethalin formulation was applied at 3.3 kg ai/ha. Application of water-based pendimethalin at rates of 1.7 and 3.4 kg ai/ha and oil-based pendimethalin at rates of 0.8, 1.7, and 3.3 kg ai/ha resulted in reduced seed-cotton located at position 1 fruiting sites compared with the untreated check. POST application of S -metolachlor had no effect on fruit partitioning to horizontal fruiting positions or vertical fruiting zones. Minor differences in seed-cotton partitioning to cohorts and individual fruiting nodes were observed from application of glyphosate, pendimethalin, and S -metolachlor. However, no differences in seed-cotton yield were observed from application of glyphosate, S -metolachlor, or pendimethalin, regardless of formulation or application rate. POST pendimethalin application at rates less than 1.7 kg ai/ha is relatively safe and should provide cotton producers with an additional tool for herbicide-resistant weeds and late-season annual grasses.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin formulation and application rate had no effect on seed-cotton partitioning to horizontal fruiting zones, second- or third-position horizontal fruiting sites, or monopodial branches.

Treatment
Pendimethalin formulation and application ratee1
Outcome
seed-cotton partitioning to horizontal fruiting zonese1
Direction
had no effecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“evaluate the effect of POST-applied pendimethalin formulation and application rate on cotton fruit partitioning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–409 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pendimethalin formulation and application rate had no effect on seed-cotton partitioning to horizontal fruiting zones, on second- or third-position horizontal fruiting sites, or on monopodial branches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–838 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water-based pendimethalin formulation at 1.7 kg ai/ha and higher increased seed-cotton partitioned to plants that had lost apical dominance.

Treatment
water-based pendimethalin formulatione2
Outcome
seed-cotton partitioned to plants that had lost apical dominancee2
Direction
increasede2
Value
1.7 kg ai/hae2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“evaluate the effect of POST-applied pendimethalin formulation and application rate on cotton fruit partitioning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–409 · show in text ↑
e2

“increased seed-cotton partitioned to plants that had lost apical dominance was observed when the water-based pendimethalin formulation was applied at rates of 1.7 kg ai/ha and higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–1031 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oil-based pendimethalin formulation at 3.3 kg ai/ha increased seed-cotton partitioned to plants that had lost apical dominance.

Treatment
oil-based pendimethalin formulatione3
Outcome
seed-cotton partitioned to plants that had lost apical dominancee3
Direction
increasede3
Value
3.3 kg ai/hae3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“evaluate the effect of POST-applied pendimethalin formulation and application rate on cotton fruit partitioning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–409 · show in text ↑
e3

“increased seed-cotton partitioned to plants that had lost apical dominance was observed when the water-based pendimethalin formulation was applied at rates of 1.7 kg ai/ha and higher as well as when the oil-based pendimethalin formulation was applied at 3.3 kg ai/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–1115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water-based pendimethalin at 1.7 and 3.4 kg ai/ha reduced seed-cotton at position 1 fruiting sites compared with the untreated check.

Treatment
water-based pendimethaline4
Outcome
seed-cotton located at position 1 fruiting sitese4
Direction
reducede4
Value
1.7 and 3.4 kg ai/hae4
Comparator
untreated checke4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“evaluate the effect of POST-applied pendimethalin formulation and application rate on cotton fruit partitioning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–409 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of water-based pendimethalin at rates of 1.7 and 3.4 kg ai/ha and oil-based pendimethalin at rates of 0.8, 1.7, and 3.3 kg ai/ha resulted in reduced seed-cotton located at position 1 fruiting sites compared with the untreated check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1360 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oil-based pendimethalin at 0.8, 1.7 and 3.3 kg ai/ha reduced seed-cotton at position 1 fruiting sites compared with the untreated check.

Treatment
oil-based pendimethaline4
Outcome
seed-cotton located at position 1 fruiting sitese4
Direction
reducede4
Value
0.8, 1.7, and 3.3 kg ai/hae4
Comparator
untreated checke4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“evaluate the effect of POST-applied pendimethalin formulation and application rate on cotton fruit partitioning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–409 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of water-based pendimethalin at rates of 1.7 and 3.4 kg ai/ha and oil-based pendimethalin at rates of 0.8, 1.7, and 3.3 kg ai/ha resulted in reduced seed-cotton located at position 1 fruiting sites compared with the untreated check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1360 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

POST application of S-metolachlor had no effect on fruit partitioning to horizontal fruiting positions or vertical fruiting zones.

Treatment
POST application of S -metolachlore6
Outcome
fruit partitioning to horizontal fruiting positions or vertical fruiting zonese6
Direction
had no effecte6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“evaluate the effect of POST-applied pendimethalin formulation and application rate on cotton fruit partitioning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–409 · show in text ↑
e6

“POST application of S -metolachlor had no effect on fruit partitioning to horizontal fruiting positions or vertical fruiting zones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1492 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of glyphosate caused minor differences in seed-cotton partitioning to cohorts and individual fruiting nodes.

Treatment
glyphosatee7
Outcome
seed-cotton partitioning to cohorts and individual fruiting nodese7
Qualifier
Minor differencese7

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“evaluate the effect of POST-applied pendimethalin formulation and application rate on cotton fruit partitioning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–409 · show in text ↑
e7

“Minor differences in seed-cotton partitioning to cohorts and individual fruiting nodes were observed from application of glyphosate, pendimethalin, and S -metolachlor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1494–1660 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of pendimethalin caused minor differences in seed-cotton partitioning to cohorts and individual fruiting nodes.

Treatment
pendimethaline7
Outcome
seed-cotton partitioning to cohorts and individual fruiting nodese7
Qualifier
Minor differencese7

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“evaluate the effect of POST-applied pendimethalin formulation and application rate on cotton fruit partitioning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–409 · show in text ↑
e7

“Minor differences in seed-cotton partitioning to cohorts and individual fruiting nodes were observed from application of glyphosate, pendimethalin, and S -metolachlor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1494–1660 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of S-metolachlor caused minor differences in seed-cotton partitioning to cohorts and individual fruiting nodes.

Treatment
S -metolachlore7
Outcome
seed-cotton partitioning to cohorts and individual fruiting nodese7
Qualifier
Minor differencese7

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“evaluate the effect of POST-applied pendimethalin formulation and application rate on cotton fruit partitioning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–409 · show in text ↑
e7

“Minor differences in seed-cotton partitioning to cohorts and individual fruiting nodes were observed from application of glyphosate, pendimethalin, and S -metolachlor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1494–1660 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate application produced no change in seed-cotton yield, regardless of formulation or rate.

Treatment
glyphosatee1
Outcome
seed-cotton yielde1
Direction
no differencese1
Qualifier
regardless of formulation or application ratee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“evaluate the effect of POST-applied pendimethalin formulation and application rate on cotton fruit partitioning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–409 · show in text ↑
e1

“no differences in seed-cotton yield were observed from application of glyphosate, S -metolachlor, or pendimethalin, regardless of formulation or application rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1671–1832 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S-metolachlor application produced no change in seed-cotton yield, regardless of formulation or rate.

Treatment
S -metolachlore1
Outcome
seed-cotton yielde1
Direction
no differencese1
Qualifier
regardless of formulation or application ratee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“evaluate the effect of POST-applied pendimethalin formulation and application rate on cotton fruit partitioning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–409 · show in text ↑
e1

“no differences in seed-cotton yield were observed from application of glyphosate, S -metolachlor, or pendimethalin, regardless of formulation or application rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1671–1832 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin application produced no change in seed-cotton yield, regardless of formulation or rate.

Treatment
pendimethaline1
Outcome
seed-cotton yielde1
Direction
no differencese1
Qualifier
regardless of formulation or application ratee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“evaluate the effect of POST-applied pendimethalin formulation and application rate on cotton fruit partitioning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–409 · show in text ↑
e1

“no differences in seed-cotton yield were observed from application of glyphosate, S -metolachlor, or pendimethalin, regardless of formulation or application rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1671–1832 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

POST pendimethalin at rates below 1.7 kg ai/ha is relatively safe and should give cotton producers an additional tool for herbicide-resistant weeds and late-season annual grasses.

Treatment
POST pendimethalin applicatione1
Outcome
relatively safee1
Value
less than 1.7 kg ai/hae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“POST pendimethalin application at rates less than 1.7 kg ai/ha is relatively safe and should provide cotton producers with an additional tool for herbicide-resistant weeds and late-season annual grasses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1834–2036 · show in text ↑

glyphosate · phenology · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

6 papers: 0 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

pendimethalin · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

49 papers: 43 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

glyphosate · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

61 papers: 35 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

metolachlor · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.