Paper · 1997 · Peanut Science

Purple Nutsedge Control in Peanut as Affected by Imazameth and Imazethapyr Application Timing1

P. A. Dotray; J. W. Keeling

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
18
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Field experiments in 1994 and 1995 compared control by imazameth at 53 and 71 g ai/ha and imazethapyr at 71 g ai/ha applied to purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus L.) 5, 10, 20, or 30 cm tall. Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) injury was not observed with either herbicide. Imazameth and imazethapyr were similarly effective on purple nutsedge for the first 1 to 2 mo after planting. Regardless of application timing, imazameth was more effective than imazethapyr at approximately 3 mo or more after planting. Timing of application affected late-season control by imazameth only in 1995 where greater control was obtained when applied to 10- or 20-cm purple nutsedge. Peanut yields were variable in 1994 and were not related to the imidazolinone herbicide used, the herbicide rate, or the level of purple nutsedge control. In 1995, yield from plots treated with imazameth at 53 g/ha was greater than yield from plots treated with imazameth or imazethapyr at 71 g/ha. Timing of herbicide application did not affect yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazameth and imazethapyr were similarly effective on purple nutsedge for the first 1 to 2 months after planting.

Treatment
imazamethe0
Interactor
purple nutsedgee0weed
Outcome
effective on purple nutsedgee0
Direction
similarlye0
Qualifier
for the first 1 to 2 mo after plantinge0
Comparator
imazethapyre0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Purple Nutsedge Control in Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
e0

“Imazameth and imazethapyr were similarly effective on purple nutsedge for the first 1 to 2 mo after planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–384 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazameth was more effective than imazethapyr at about 3 months or more after planting, regardless of application timing.

Treatment
imazamethe1
Outcome
effectivee1
Direction
more effectivee1
Qualifier
at approximately 3 mo or more after plantinge1
Comparator
imazethapyre1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Purple Nutsedge Control in Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
e1

“Regardless of application timing, imazameth was more effective than imazethapyr at approximately 3 mo or more after planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–510 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Timing of application affected late-season control of purple nutsedge by imazameth only in 1995, with greater control when applied to 10- or 20-cm plants.

Treatment
Timing of applicatione2
Interactor
purple nutsedgee2weed
Outcome
late-season controle2
Direction
greatere2
Qualifier
only in 1995e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Purple Nutsedge Control in Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
e2

“Timing of application affected late-season control by imazameth only in 1995 where greater control was obtained when applied to 10- or 20-cm purple nutsedge”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–668 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut yields in 1994 were not related to the imidazolinone herbicide used.

Treatment
imidazolinone herbicidee3
Outcome
yieldse3
Qualifier
in 1994e3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Purple Nutsedge Control in Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
e3

“Peanut yields were variable in 1994 and were not related to the imidazolinone herbicide used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–762 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1995, peanut yield from imazameth at 53 g/ha was greater than from imazameth or imazethapyr at 71 g/ha.

Treatment
imazameth at 53 g/hae4
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
greatere4
Qualifier
In 1995e4
Comparator
imazameth or imazethapyr at 71 g/hae4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Purple Nutsedge Control in Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
e4

“In 1995, yield from plots treated with imazameth at 53 g/ha was greater than yield from plots treated with imazameth or imazethapyr at 71 g/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–967 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Timing of herbicide application did not affect peanut yield.

Treatment
Timing of herbicide applicatione5
Outcome
yielde5

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Purple Nutsedge Control in Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
e5

“Timing of herbicide application did not affect yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1021 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut injury was not observed with either herbicide.

Outcome
injurye6
Qualifier
not observed with either herbicidee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Purple Nutsedge Control in Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
e6

“Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) injury was not observed with either herbicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 200–274 · show in text ↑

imazapic · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

20 papers: 15 positive, 5 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

herbicide · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

230 papers: 172 positive, 58 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 172 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

226 papers more in this group

See all 230 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.