Paper · 1992 · HortScience

Concentration Response of Zonal Geranium and Potted Chrysanthemum to Uniconazole

Harry K. Tayama; Stephen A. Carver

2
claims
5
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Uniconazole spray or drench applications to `Yours Truly' zonal geranium (Pelargonium × hortorum L.H. Bailey) and `Bright Golden Anne' and Yellow Favor' chrysanthemums [Dendranthema ×grandiflorum (Ramat.) Kitamura] were made to evaluate efficacy and identify optimum application concentrations. Spray applications at 10 mg a.i./liter retarded stem elongation in unpinched zonal geranium comparable to chlormequat at 1500 mg a.i./liter. `Bright Golden Anne' was more sensitive to uniconazole than `Yellow Favor'. Uniconazole spray concentrations of 20 to 30 mg a.i./liter retarded plant height equal to daminozide at 5000 mg a.i./liter. Chemical names used: 2-chloro-N,N,N-trimethylethanaminium chloride (chlormequat); butanedioic acid mono (2,2-dimethylhydrazide) (daminozide); (E)-(S)-1-(4-chlorophenyl)-4,4-dimethyl-2-(1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)-pent-1-ene-3-ol (uniconazole).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uniconazole spray at 10 mg a.i./liter retarded stem elongation in unpinched zonal geranium comparably to chlormequat.

Taxon
Zonal GeraniumPelargonium ×hortorumt0
Organ / stage
steme1
Treatment
Uniconazole spraye0
Outcome
stem elongatione1
Direction
retardede1
Qualifier
10 mg a.i./litere1
Comparator
chlormequate1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pelargonium x hortorum
Pelargonium ×hortorum · TaxonPhoto by David J. Stang · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Zonal Geranium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“Uniconazole spray or drench applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–40 · show in text ↑
e1

“Spray applications at 10 mg a.i./liter retarded stem elongation in unpinched zonal geranium comparable to chlormequat at 1500 mg a.i./liter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–434 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uniconazole spray at 20 to 30 mg a.i./liter retarded plant height equal to daminozide at 5000 mg a.i./liter.

Taxon
Zonal Geranium and Potted Chrysanthemumt0
Treatment
Uniconazole spray concentrations of 20 to 30 mg a.i./litere3
Outcome
plant heighte3
Direction
retardede3
Comparator
daminozidee3

Verbatim

t0

“Zonal Geranium and Potted Chrysanthemum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–65 · show in text ↑
e3

“Uniconazole spray concentrations of 20 to 30 mg a.i./liter retarded plant height equal to daminozide at 5000 mg a.i./liter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–634 · show in text ↑

uniconazole · growth · ChrysanthemumPositive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

uniconazole · growth · Pelargonium x hortorum (zonal geranium)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · growth · ChrysanthemumPositive and negative results

28 papers: 20 positive, 8 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

application · growth · Pelargonium x hortorum (zonal geranium)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.