Paper · 2009 · Bulletin of Entomological Research

Undamaged cotton plants yield more if their neighbour is damaged: implications for pest management

L.J. Wilson; L.J. Wilson; T.T. Lei; et al.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Understanding the compensatory responses of crops to pest damage is important in developing pest thresholds. Compensation for pest damage in crops can occur at the plant level, where the architecture, growth dynamics and allocation patterns of damaged plants are altered, allowing them to recover or, at the crop level, where differential damage between plants may alter plant-to-plant interactions. We investigated growth and yield of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) following non-uniform manual defoliation of seedlings. This partially replicates real pest damage and is valuable in understanding crop-level responses to damage because it can be inflicted precisely. Damage distributions included damaging 0, 25, 50, 75 or 100% of the plants. Damage intensity for the damaged plants was varied by removing 100 or 75% of each true leaf when plants had two, four and six true leaves. At the crop level, yield loss increased as the proportion of plants damaged and intensity of damage per damaged plant increased. Neighbour interactions occurred; undamaged plants with damaged neighbours grew larger and yielded better than undamaged plants with undamaged neighbours, while the converse applied for damaged plants with undamaged neighbours. Neighbour interactions were influenced by the intensity of damage and were stronger when 100% of the leaf area was removed than when 75% was removed. At the crop level, when compared with yield estimates based on yield of plants from uniformly damaged or undamaged plots, these interactions resulted in higher yield than expected (+8%). This suggests that damage distribution may have to be considered in studies where artificial or real pest damage is inflicted uniformly on plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop yield loss increased with the proportion of damaged plants.

Treatment
proportion of plants damagede0
Outcome
yield losse0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield loss increased as the proportion of plants damaged and intensity of damage per damaged plant increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1010 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–466 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop yield loss increased with defoliation intensity.

Treatment
intensity of damage per damaged plante0
Outcome
yield losse0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield loss increased as the proportion of plants damaged and intensity of damage per damaged plant increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1010 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–466 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Undamaged plants grew larger beside damaged neighbors than beside undamaged neighbors.

Treatment
damaged neighbourse0
Outcome
grew largere0
Direction
largere0
Comparator
undamaged plants with undamaged neighbourse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“undamaged plants with damaged neighbours grew larger and yielded better than undamaged plants with undamaged neighbours”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1164 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–466 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Undamaged plants yielded better beside damaged neighbors than beside undamaged neighbors.

Treatment
damaged neighbourse0
Outcome
yielded bettere0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
undamaged plants with undamaged neighbourse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“undamaged plants with damaged neighbours grew larger and yielded better than undamaged plants with undamaged neighbours”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1164 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–466 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Damaged plants grew less beside undamaged neighbors.

Treatment
damaged plants with undamaged neighbourse0
Outcome
the conversee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the converse applied for damaged plants with undamaged neighbours”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1237 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–466 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neighbor interactions were stronger at complete than 75% leaf removal.

Treatment
100% of the leaf area was removede0
Outcome
Neighbour interactionse0
Direction
strongere0
Comparator
75% was removede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neighbour interactions were influenced by the intensity of damage and were stronger when 100% of the leaf area was removed than when 75% was removed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1387 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–466 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neighbor interactions yielded 8% more crop yield than expected from uniform plots.

Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
+8%e0
Comparator
yield estimatese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these interactions resulted in higher yield than expected (+8%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1511–1574 · show in text ↑
e1

“yield estimates based on yield of plants from uniformly damaged or undamaged plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1427–1509 · show in text ↑
e2

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–466 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Damage distribution may need consideration in studies with uniform artificial or real pest damage.

Outcome
damage distribution may have to be considerede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“damage distribution may have to be considered in studies where artificial or real pest damage is inflicted uniformly on plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1595–1721 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–466 · show in text ↑

competition · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

16 papers: 2 positive, 14 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.