Paper · 2001 · FEMS Microbiology Letters

Effects of long-term storage at different temperatures on conidia ofBotrytis cinereaPers.: Fr.

Katia Gindro; Roger Pezet

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
23
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Survival of Botrytis cinerea conidia was studied after storage without pretreatments at different temperatures (-80 degrees C, -20 degrees C, 4 degrees C and 21 degrees C). Germination tests performed during 3 years showed that viability at 21 degrees C was completely lost after 1 month. Conidia stored for 30 months at -80 degrees C, -20 degrees C and 4 degrees C were able to germinate, respectively, at 79%, 8% and 0.2%. Changes in adenylate level, energy charge and respiration (O(2) consumption) made on each set of conidia were correlated to the germination rate. The 30-month-old stored conidia showed differences in pathogenicity tests on apples. While the pathogenic aggressiveness of conidia stored at -80 degrees C was almost the same as for fresh conidia, it decreased with increasing temperature of storage. An ultrastructural study made on conidia stored for 30 months at -80 degrees C has shown the emergence of a new wall layer in a retraction zone of the cytoplasm by comparison to fresh conidia. However, the integrity of the cytoplasmic content was maintained. The effects of low temperature storage, maintenance of cell integrity and pathogenicity of conidia of B. cinerea are discussed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 30 months, conidia stored at −80 °C had almost the same pathogenic aggressiveness on apples as fresh conidia.

Treatment
stored at -80 degrees Ce0
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereae1
Outcome
pathogenic aggressivenesse0
Direction
almost the samee0
Qualifier
30-month-olde0
Comparator
fresh conidiae0

Not reportedInteractor role

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 30-month-old stored conidia showed differences in pathogenicity tests on apples. While the pathogenic aggressiveness of conidia stored at -80 degrees C was almost the same as for fresh conidia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–767 · show in text ↑
e1

“Survival of Botrytis cinerea conidia was studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–48 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Botrytis conidial pathogenic aggressiveness on apples decreased with increasing storage temperature.

Treatment
increasing temperature of storagee0
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereae1
Outcome
pathogenic aggressivenesse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedInteractor role

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 30-month-old stored conidia showed differences in pathogenicity tests on apples. While the pathogenic aggressiveness of conidia stored at -80 degrees C was almost the same as for fresh conidia, it decreased with increasing temperature of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–820 · show in text ↑
e1

“Survival of Botrytis cinerea conidia was studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–48 · show in text ↑

storage · Botrytis cinerea · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.