Paper · 2007 · New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science

Effect of surface coating on ripening and early peel spotting in ‘Sucrier’ banana ( Musa acuminata )

S. Promyou; S. Ketsa; W. G. Van Doorn

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract ‘Sucrier’ bananas (Musa acuminata , AA Group) show peel spotting when the peel is just about as yellow as green, which coincides with optimum eating quality. As consumers might relate the spotting to overripe fruit, early spotting is considered undesirable, especially for export markets. Fruit were left uncoated (controls) or coated with polyethylene parafilm wax at concentrations of 20%, 25%, and 30% (v/v) and then held at 29–30°C for 5 days. Compared with controls, each of the concentrations delayed early peel spotting. Eating quality was not affected by the 20% coating, but was negatively affected by the higher concentrations. Further tests, using 20% coating, showed that the delay of peel spotting was not associated with a change in peel total free phenolics or with polyphenol oxidase (PPO) activity, but it was accompanied by reduced in vitro phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) activity. Results suggest that the delay in peel spotting, after surface coating, is a result, at least in part, of reduced PAL activity. Low rate of oxygen diffusion through the coating might be the factor that limits the last step to blackening.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Each coating concentration delayed early peel spotting versus controls.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
each of the concentrationse0
Outcome
early peel spottinge0
Direction
delayede0
Comparator
controlse0

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with controls, each of the concentrations delayed early peel spotting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–535 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 20% coating did not affect eating quality.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
20% coatinge0
Outcome
Eating qualitye0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Eating quality was not affected by the 20% coating”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–587 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher coating concentrations negatively affected eating quality.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
higher concentrationse0
Outcome
Eating qualitye0
Direction
negatively affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Eating quality was not affected by the 20% coating, but was negatively affected by the higher concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–645 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–81 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 20% coating delayed spotting without a change in peel total free phenolics.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
20% coatinge0
Outcome
peel total free phenolicse0
Direction
not associated with a changee0

Verbatim

e0

“Further tests, using 20% coating, showed that the delay of peel spotting was not associated with a change in peel total free phenolics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–781 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–81 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 20% coating delayed spotting without a change in PPO activity.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
20% coatinge0
Outcome
polyphenol oxidase (PPO) activitye0
Direction
not associated with a changee0

Verbatim

e0

“Further tests, using 20% coating, showed that the delay of peel spotting was not associated with a change in peel total free phenolics or with polyphenol oxidase (PPO) activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–823 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–81 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed spotting accompanied reduced PAL activity.

Taxon
bananat0
Gene
phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL)e0
Outcome
in vitro phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) activitye0
Direction
reducede0

Verbatim

e0

“it was accompanied by reduced in vitro phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–910 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–81 · show in text ↑

storage · quality: general · MusaPositive and negative results

10 papers: 4 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.