Abstract
Field studies were conducted in 1998 and 1999 at one location in Atascosa and two locations in Wilson County to evaluate the effects of power plant by-product gypsum in comparison with agricultural gypsum applied to peanuts at planting or pegging. The Atascosa County site contained moderate to high calcium (Ca) levels while the Wilson County site was low to moderate in Ca. No differences in southern blight, Rhizoctonia pod rot disease control, peanut yield, or grade were noted with each gypsum source. Gypsum reduced disease development at two of three locations but only increased peanut yield or grade at one of three locations.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Gypsum sources did not differ in southern blight or Rhizoctonia pod rot control.
- Taxon
- peanuts
Arachis hypogaeae1 - Treatment
- power plant by-product gypsume1
- Interactor
- Rhizoctonia
.jpg?width=60)
Rhizoctoniae0pathogen - Outcome
- southern blight, Rhizoctonia pod rot disease controle0
- Direction
- No differencese0
- Comparator
- agricultural gypsume1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“No differences in southern blight, Rhizoctonia pod rot disease control, peanut yield, or grade were noted with each gypsum source.”
e1“power plant by-product gypsum in comparison with agricultural gypsum applied to peanuts at planting or pegging”
Claim · model-written summary
Gypsum sources did not differ in peanut yield or grade.
- Taxon
- peanutsArachis hypogaeae1
- Treatment
- power plant by-product gypsume1
- Outcome
- peanut yield, or gradee0
- Direction
- No differencese0
- Comparator
- agricultural gypsume1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“No differences in southern blight, Rhizoctonia pod rot disease control, peanut yield, or grade were noted with each gypsum source.”
e1“power plant by-product gypsum in comparison with agricultural gypsum applied to peanuts at planting or pegging”
Claim · model-written summary
Gypsum reduced disease at two of three locations.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- Gypsume0
- Outcome
- disease developmente0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Qualifier
- two of three locationse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Gypsum reduced disease development at two of three locations but only increased peanut yield or grade at one of three locations.”
Claim · model-written summary
Gypsum increased peanut yield or grade at only one of three locations.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- Gypsume0
- Outcome
- peanut yield or gradee0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- one of three locationse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Gypsum reduced disease development at two of three locations but only increased peanut yield or grade at one of three locations.”
The same questions in other papers
lime · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →lime · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
132 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
138 papers more in this group
See all 142 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.