Abstract
Summary. The selective action of triazine herbicides for control of wild canarygrass ( Phalaris spp.) in wheat was studied in four field experiments. Canarygrass was controlled by pre‐ and post‐emergence applications of methoprotryne and terbutryne. The phytotoxicity of methoprotryne to wheat was higher than that of terbutryne. Addition of small amounts of simazine to either one of the methylthiotriazines considerably increased damage to wheat. The most resistant stage of wheat after emergence was that of spike initiation, whereas the most sensitive stage was that of earing. Increase of yield as a result of control of canarygrass was higher in semi‐dwarf wheat than in normal‐height cultivars. Application of 625 g/ha of terbutryne to a semi‐dwarf cultivar pre‐ and post‐emergence increased grain yield by 56% and 29%, respectively. Action selective des triazines pour la lutte contre les Phalaris dans le blé
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Wild canarygrass was controlled in wheat by pre- and post-emergence applications of methoprotryne and terbutryne.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume7 - Treatment
- pre‐ and post‐emergence applications of methoprotryne and terbutrynee0
- Interactor
- wild canarygrasse7weed
- Outcome
- Canarygrasse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Canarygrass was controlled by pre‐ and post‐emergence applications of methoprotryne and terbutryne”
e7“for control of wild canarygrass ( Phalaris spp.) in wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Methoprotryne was more phytotoxic to wheat than terbutryne.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume7 - Treatment
- methoprotrynee1
- Outcome
- phytotoxicity of methoprotryne to wheate1
- Direction
- highere1
- Comparator
- terbutrynee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“The phytotoxicity of methoprotryne to wheat was higher than that of terbutryne”
e7“for control of wild canarygrass ( Phalaris spp.) in wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Adding small amounts of simazine to either methylthiotriazine considerably increased damage to wheat.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume7 - Treatment
- Addition of small amounts of simazinee2
- Outcome
- damage to wheate2
- Direction
- increasede2
- Comparator
- either one of the methylthiotriazinese2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e2“Addition of small amounts of simazine to either one of the methylthiotriazines considerably increased damage to wheat”
e7“for control of wild canarygrass ( Phalaris spp.) in wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat was most resistant to the triazines after emergence at the spike initiation stage.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume7 - Organ / stage
- spike initiatione3
- Outcome
- stage of wheat after emergencee3
- Direction
- most resistante3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e3“The most resistant stage of wheat after emergence was that of spike initiation”
e7“for control of wild canarygrass ( Phalaris spp.) in wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat was most sensitive to the triazines after emergence at the earing stage.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume7 - Organ / stage
- earinge4
- Outcome
- most sensitive stagee4
- Direction
- most sensitivee4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e4“whereas the most sensitive stage was that of earing”
e7“for control of wild canarygrass ( Phalaris spp.) in wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Yield increase from canarygrass control was higher in semi-dwarf wheat than in normal-height cultivars.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume7 - Material
- semi‐dwarf wheate5
- Treatment
- control of canarygrasse5
- Outcome
- Increase of yielde5
- Direction
- highere5
- Comparator
- normal‐height cultivarse5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e5“Increase of yield as a result of control of canarygrass was higher in semi‐dwarf wheat than in normal‐height cultivars”
e7“for control of wild canarygrass ( Phalaris spp.) in wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Application of 625 g/ha terbutryne pre- and post-emergence increased grain yield of a semi-dwarf wheat cultivar by 56%.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume7 - Material
- semi‐dwarf cultivare6
- Treatment
- Application of 625 g/ha of terbutrynee6
- Outcome
- grain yielde6
- Direction
- increasede6
- Value
- 56%e6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e6“Application of 625 g/ha of terbutryne to a semi‐dwarf cultivar pre‐ and post‐emergence increased grain yield by 56% and 29%, respectively”
e7“for control of wild canarygrass ( Phalaris spp.) in wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Application of 625 g/ha terbutryne post-emergence increased grain yield of a semi-dwarf wheat cultivar by 29%.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume7 - Material
- semi‐dwarf cultivare6
- Treatment
- Application of 625 g/ha of terbutrynee6
- Outcome
- grain yielde6
- Direction
- increasede6
- Value
- 29%e6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e6“Application of 625 g/ha of terbutryne to a semi‐dwarf cultivar pre‐ and post‐emergence increased grain yield by 56% and 29%, respectively”
e7“for control of wild canarygrass ( Phalaris spp.) in wheat”
The same questions in other papers
terbutryn · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →herbicide · organism · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
27 papers more in this group
See all 31 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.