Paper · 1982 · New Phytologist

THE INOCULATION OF WHITE CLOVER WITH MYCORRHIZAL FUNGI IN UNSTERILE HILL SOILS

A. RANGELEY; M. J. DAFT; P. NEWBOULD

19
claims
42
verbatim quotes
44
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

SUMMARY The response of two cultivars of white clover (Aberystwyth S184 and New Zealand Grasslands Huia), grown under laboratory and field conditions, to inoculation with two endophytes ( Glomus mosseae L1 and Glomus etunicatus ) was investigated in two hill soils with various amounts of added phosphate. In the experiment with the deep peat soil in the laboratory, inoculation with either endophyte increased infection from 2% to up to 70%, the increase being less the higher the amount of added P. Shoot growth of white clover was significantly increased ( P ≤ 0.05) by inoculation at the 0 and 20 kg P ha −1 level and decreased at the highest level of added P (200 kg P ha −1 ). Both endophytes produced similar effects. With the brown earth soil, total infection of roots with indigenous endophytes ranged from 30 to 50 % and this was significantly ( P ≤ 0.05) increased by inoculation only at 40 kg P ha −1 . However, the introduced coarse endophytes had replaced between a quarter and a half of the predominantly fine indigenous endophyte at each level of added P. This change of endophyte was without significant effect on dry wt of shoots and roots although there was a general trend for inoculation, and with Glomus etunicatus more than with Glomus mosseae LI, to increase shoot and root dry wt. Inoculation also tended to increase the P content of shoots and roots but this was statistically significant only at 40 kg P ha −1 . In the field experiment with the deep peat soil, inoculation with Giomus mosseae L1 doubled the amount of infected root from 18 to 42% but there was no effect on shoot growth or the concentration of P. With the brown earth soil, although the amount of infection was not increased, the introduced coarse endophytes had become established in the roots but no effect on shoot growth was observed in the year of sowing. However, in the first harvest year, in the presence of 40 kg P ha −1 , clover inoculated with Glomus etunicatus produced double the amount of dry shoot per hectare produced by uninoculated plants and 75% greater than that produced with Glomus mosseae L1. These observations encourage the view that inoculation with mycorrhizal fungi of white clover for improved hill pastures might have a practical role if the responses could be made more predictable. It is concluded that further work is justified to understand the ecology of mycorrhizal fungi in hill pastures and how the symbiosis functions, to select suitable endophytes and to develop methods of inoculation appropriate for use in routine field practice.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In deep peat soil, inoculation increased root infection from 2% to up to 70%.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
inoculation with either endophytee0
Interactor
Glomus mosseae L1Funneliformis mosseaee1symbiont
Outcome
infectione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
up to 70%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation with either endophyte increased infection from 2% to up to 70%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–441 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHITE CLOVER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–31 · show in text ↑
e1

“Glomus mosseae L1 and Glomus etunicatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–227 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The inoculation gain in infection diminished as added phosphorus increased.

Taxon
WHITE CLOVERTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
added Pe0
Outcome
increasee0
Direction
lesse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the increase being less the higher the amount of added P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–499 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHITE CLOVER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation significantly increased white clover shoot growth at 0 and 20 kg P ha −1.

Taxon
white cloverTrifolium repense0
Treatment
inoculatione0
Outcome
Shoot growthe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
0 and 20 kg P ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot growth of white clover was significantly increased ( P ≤ 0.05) by inoculation at the 0 and 20 kg P ha −1 level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–617 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 200 kg P ha −1, inoculation decreased shoot growth.

Taxon
WHITE CLOVERTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
inoculatione1
Outcome
Shoot growthe1
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
200 kg P ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreased at the highest level of added P (200 kg P ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–681 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHITE CLOVER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–31 · show in text ↑
e1

“Shoot growth of white clover was significantly increased ( P ≤ 0.05) by inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–584 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both mycorrhizal endophytes produced similar effects.

Taxon
WHITE CLOVERTrifolium repenst0
Outcome
similar effectse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both endophytes produced similar effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–723 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHITE CLOVER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–31 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In brown earth soil, indigenous endophyte infection ranged from 30 to 50%.

Taxon
WHITE CLOVERTrifolium repenst0
Outcome
total infection of roots with indigenous endophytese0
Value
30 to 50 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total infection of roots with indigenous endophytes ranged from 30 to 50 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–826 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHITE CLOVER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation significantly increased root infection in brown earth soil only at 40 kg P ha −1.

Taxon
WHITE CLOVERTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
inoculatione0
Outcome
thise0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
40 kg P ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this was significantly ( P ≤ 0.05) increased by inoculation only at 40 kg P ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–912 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHITE CLOVER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–31 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Introduced coarse endophytes replaced between a quarter and a half of indigenous endophytes at each phosphorus level.

Taxon
WHITE CLOVERTrifolium repenst0
Outcome
introduced coarse endophytes had replacede0
Value
between a quarter and a halfe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“introduced coarse endophytes had replaced between a quarter and a half of the predominantly fine indigenous endophyte at each level of added P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1070 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHITE CLOVER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Endophyte replacement had no significant effect on shoot and root dry weight.

Taxon
WHITE CLOVERTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
change of endophytee0
Outcome
dry wt of shoots and rootse0
Direction
without significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This change of endophyte was without significant effect on dry wt of shoots and roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1157 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHITE CLOVER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation tended to increase shoot and root dry weight, particularly with G. etunicatus.

Taxon
WHITE CLOVERTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
inoculatione0
Interactor
Glomus etunicatuse0symbiont
Outcome
shoot and root dry wte0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
Glomus mosseae LIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“general trend for inoculation, and with Glomus etunicatus more than with Glomus mosseae LI, to increase shoot and root dry wt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1304 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHITE CLOVER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation tended to increase shoot and root phosphorus content, significantly only at 40 kg P ha −1.

Taxon
WHITE CLOVERTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
Inoculatione0
Outcome
P content of shoots and rootse0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
40 kg P ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation also tended to increase the P content of shoots and roots but this was statistically significant only at 40 kg P ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1306–1436 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHITE CLOVER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field inoculation with Giomus mosseae L1 raised infected root from 18 to 42%.

Taxon
WHITE CLOVERTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
inoculation with Giomus mosseae L1e0
Interactor
Giomus mosseae L1e0symbiont
Outcome
amount of infected roote0
Direction
doublede0
Value
42%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation with Giomus mosseae L1 doubled the amount of infected root from 18 to 42%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1488–1573 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHITE CLOVER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field inoculation did not affect shoot growth or phosphorus concentration in deep peat soil.

Taxon
WHITE CLOVERTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
inoculatione1
Outcome
shoot growth or the concentration of Pe0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was no effect on shoot growth or the concentration of P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1578–1639 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHITE CLOVER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–31 · show in text ↑
e1

“inoculation with Giomus mosseae L1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1488–1522 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In brown earth field soil, inoculation did not increase root infection.

Taxon
WHITE CLOVERTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
inoculatione1
Outcome
amount of infectione0
Direction
not increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the amount of infection was not increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1677–1718 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHITE CLOVER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–31 · show in text ↑
e1

“inoculation with Giomus mosseae L1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1488–1522 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Introduced coarse endophytes established in brown earth field roots.

Taxon
WHITE CLOVERTrifolium repenst0
Outcome
introduced coarse endophytes had become established in the rootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“introduced coarse endophytes had become established in the roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1724–1788 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHITE CLOVER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brown earth field inoculation had no effect on shoot growth in the sowing year.

Taxon
WHITE CLOVERTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
inoculatione1
Outcome
shoot growthe0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no effect on shoot growth was observed in the year of sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1793–1853 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHITE CLOVER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–31 · show in text ↑
e1

“inoculation with Giomus mosseae L1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1488–1522 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 40 kg P ha −1, G. etunicatus inoculation doubled clover dry shoot yield relative to uninoculated plants.

Taxon
cloverTrifoliume0
Treatment
inoculated with Glomus etunicatuse0
Interactor
Glomus etunicatuse0symbiont
Outcome
dry shoot per hectaree0
Direction
doublee0
Value
doublee0
Comparator
uninoculated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium
Trifolium · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)AnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“clover inoculated with Glomus etunicatus produced double the amount of dry shoot per hectare produced by uninoculated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1926–2050 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G. etunicatus inoculation yielded 75% more dry shoot than G. mosseae L1 inoculation.

Taxon
WHITE CLOVERTrifolium repenst0
Treatment
Glomus etunicatuse1
Interactor
Glomus etunicatuse1symbiont
Outcome
dry shoote1
Direction
greatere0
Value
75%e0
Comparator
Glomus mosseae L1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“75% greater than that produced with Glomus mosseae L1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2055–2108 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHITE CLOVER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–31 · show in text ↑
e1

“clover inoculated with Glomus etunicatus produced double the amount of dry shoot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1926–2006 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend further work on mycorrhizal ecology, endophyte selection and field inoculation methods.

Taxon
WHITE CLOVERTrifolium repenst0
Outcome
further work is justifiede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“further work is justified to understand the ecology of mycorrhizal fungi in hill pastures and how the symbiosis functions, to select suitable endophytes and to develop methods of inoculation appropriate for use in routine field practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2329–2565 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHITE CLOVER”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–31 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · Trifolium repens (white clover)Results differ

36 papers: 31 positive, 5 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

inoculation · Funneliformis mosseae · Trifolium repens (white clover)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Trifolium repens (white clover)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.