Paper · 1982 · New Phytologist

VESICULAR‐ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZA IN NATURAL VEGETATION SYSTEMS

J. WHITTINGHAM; D. J. READ

4
claims
10
verbatim quotes
256
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

S ummary The functional role of mycorrhizal interconnections between plants was investigated in pot experiments which were designed to simulate some of the circumstances of the regeneration niche in grassland. Young plants of Festuca ovina L. and Plantago lanceolata L. were grown in pots in close association with adults of the same species in the mycorrhizal (M) and non‐mycorrhizal (NM) condition. 32 P or nutrient solution was applied to isolated parts of mature ‘source’ plants and transport of the nutrients to younger ‘sink’ plants was examined in the mycorrhizal and non‐mycorrhizal condition. Transport was determined either by measuring 32 P in, or total yield of, sink plants at sequential harvests. Greater movement of 32 P occurred into roots of mycorrhizal plants of both species. The differences were stastistically significant after only 24 h in F. ovina and after 48 h in P. lanceolata. Application of nutrient solution to source plants led to significantly greater yield in M sinks after 18 and 30 weeks. It is concluded that direct transfer of nutrients between living source and sink plants occurs by way of connecting mycorrhizal hyphae. The significance of these observations for nutrition and survival of young plants is assessed and the broader implications for nutrient cycling in ecosystems considered.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal Festuca ovina L. roots received greater 32 P movement, significant after 24 h.

Taxon
Festuca ovina L.Festuca ovinae0
Organ / stage
rootse1
Treatment
mycorrhizal plantse1
Outcome
movement of 32 Pe1
Direction
Greatere1
Value
24 he2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Festuca ovina
Festuca ovina · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Young plants of Festuca ovina L. and Plantago lanceolata L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–269 · show in text ↑
e1

“Greater movement of 32 P occurred into roots of mycorrhizal plants of both species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–793 · show in text ↑
e2

“The differences were stastistically significant after only 24 h in F. ovina and after 48 h in P. lanceolata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–902 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal Plantago lanceolata L. roots received greater 32 P movement, significant after 48 h.

Taxon
Plantago lanceolata L.Plantago lanceolatae0
Organ / stage
rootse1
Treatment
mycorrhizal plantse1
Outcome
movement of 32 Pe1
Direction
Greatere1
Value
48 he2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Plantago lanceolata
Plantago lanceolata · Taxonsannse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Young plants of Festuca ovina L. and Plantago lanceolata L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–269 · show in text ↑
e1

“Greater movement of 32 P occurred into roots of mycorrhizal plants of both species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–793 · show in text ↑
e2

“The differences were stastistically significant after only 24 h in F. ovina and after 48 h in P. lanceolata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–902 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient application to source plants led to higher yields in mycorrhizal sink plants after 18 and 30 weeks.

Taxon
Festuca ovina L.Festuca ovinae1
Treatment
nutrient solutione0
Outcome
yield in M sinkse0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
after 18 and 30 weekse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Festuca ovina
Festuca ovina · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of nutrient solution to source plants led to significantly greater yield in M sinks after 18 and 30 weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1021 · show in text ↑
e1

“Young plants of Festuca ovina L. and Plantago lanceolata L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–269 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that connecting mycorrhizal hyphae directly transfer nutrients between living source and sink plants.

Taxon
Festuca ovina L.Festuca ovinae1
Outcome
direct transfer of nutrients between living source and sink plantse0
Qualifier
connecting mycorrhizal hyphaee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Festuca ovina
Festuca ovina · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It is concluded that direct transfer of nutrients between living source and sink plants occurs by way of connecting mycorrhizal hyphae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1157 · show in text ↑
e1

“Young plants of Festuca ovina L. and Plantago lanceolata L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–269 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Festuca ovinaPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.