Paper · 2015 · Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental

Intensity and duration of water deficit on the pathosystem sugarcane x Meloidogyne incognita

Matheus P. Quintela; Elvira M. R. Pedrosa; Lilia Willadino; et al.

5
claims
12
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study aimed to evaluate the interaction between intensity and duration of water deficit (90, 56 and 22% of pot capacity [PC] for 30, 60 and 90 days under continuous stress) associated to the parasitism of the nematode Meloidogyne incognita on the growth of the sugarcane variety RB92579 and the activity of the enzymes catalase and ascorbate peroxidase. The experiment was conducted in completely randomized design in a 7 x 2 factorial scheme (seven water deficit treatments: control [90% PC], 56% PC for 30, 60 and 90 days, 20% PC for 30, 60 and 90 days; and two densities of M. incognita: 0 and 20000 eggs plant-1), with four replicates. The water stress corresponding to 56% PC for 30 or 60 days did not affect RB92579 development. The evaluated water treatments increased ascorbate peroxidase activity, but it did not affect catalase activity. Nematode inoculation did not affect RB92579 responses to drought stress conditions. The higher severity of water deficit (22% PC for 90 days) reduced M. incognita reproduction.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate water stress for 30 or 60 days did not affect RB92579 development.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Material
RB92579e0
Treatment
56% PC for 30 or 60 dayse0
Outcome
RB92579 developmente0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The water stress corresponding to 56% PC for 30 or 60 days did not affect RB92579 development.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–748 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water treatments increased ascorbate peroxidase activity.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
water treatmentse0
Gene
ascorbate peroxidasee0
Outcome
ascorbate peroxidase activitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The evaluated water treatments increased ascorbate peroxidase activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–819 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water treatments did not affect catalase activity.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
water treatmentse1
Gene
catalasee0
Outcome
catalase activitye0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“but it did not affect catalase activity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–861 · show in text ↑
e1

“The evaluated water treatments increased ascorbate peroxidase activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–819 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematode inoculation did not alter sugarcane drought responses.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Material
RB92579e0
Treatment
Nematode inoculatione0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pathogen
Outcome
RB92579 responses to drought stress conditionse0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nematode inoculation did not affect RB92579 responses to drought stress conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–945 · show in text ↑
e1

“nematode Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–253 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Severe prolonged water deficit reduced M. incognita reproduction.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
22% PC for 90 dayse0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
M. incognita reproductione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The higher severity of water deficit (22% PC for 90 days) reduced M. incognita reproduction.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1038 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–68 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.