Paper · 2003 · Journal of Vegetation Science

Formalized reproduction of an expert-based phytosociological classification: A case study of subalpine tall-forb vegetation

Martin Kočí; Milan Chytrý; Lubomír Tichý

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
63
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract. Delimitation of vegetation units in phytosociology is traditionally based on expert knowledge. Applications of expert-based classifications are often inconsistent because criteria for assigning relevés to vegetation units are seldom given explicitly. Still, there is, e.g. in nature conservation, an increasing need for a consistent application of vegetation classification using computer expert systems for unit identification. We propose a procedure for formalized reproduction of an expert-based vegetation classification, which is applicable to large phytosociological data sets. This procedure combines Bruelheide's Cocktail method with a similarity-based assignment of relevés to constancy columns of a vegetation table. As a test of this method we attempt to reproduce the expert-based phytosociological classification of subalpine tall-forb vegetation of the Czech Republic which has been made by combination of expert judgement and stepwise numerical classification of 718 relevés by TWINSPAN. Applying the Cocktail method to a geographically stratified data set of 21794 relevés of all Czech vegetation types, we defined groups of species with the statistical tendency of joint occurrences in vegetation. Combinations of 12 of these species groups by logical operators AND, OR and AND NOT yielded formal definitions of 14 of 16 associations which had been accepted in the expert-based classification. Application of these formal definitions to the original data set of 718 relevés resulted in an assignment of 376 relevés to the associations. This assignment agreed well with the original expert-based classification. Relevés that remained un-assigned because they had not met the requirements of any of the formal definitions, were subsequently assigned to the associations by calculating similarity to relevé groups that had already been assigned to the associations. A new index, based on frequency and fidelity, was proposed for calculating similarity. The agreement with the expert-based classification achieved by the formal definitions was still improved after applying the similarity-based assignment. Results indicate that the expert-based classification can be successfully formalized and converted into a computer expert system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combinations of 12 species groups by logical operators yielded formal definitions of 14 of 16 expert-accepted associations.

Taxon
subalpine tall-forb vegetationt0
Outcome
formal definitionse1
Value
14 of 16e1

Verbatim

t0

“subalpine tall-forb vegetation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“Combinations of 12 of these species groups by logical operators AND, OR and AND NOT yielded formal definitions of 14 of 16 associations which had been accepted in the expert-based classification”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1419 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying the formal definitions to 718 relevés assigned 376 relevés to the associations.

Taxon
subalpine tall-forb vegetationt0
Outcome
assignment of 376 relevés to the associationse1
Value
376 relevése1

Verbatim

t0

“subalpine tall-forb vegetation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of these formal definitions to the original data set of 718 relevés resulted in an assignment of 376 relevés to the associations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1421–1561 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The assignment of relevés agreed well with the original expert-based classification.

Taxon
subalpine tall-forb vegetationt0
Outcome
agreed well with the original expert-based classificatione1
Comparator
original expert-based classificatione1

Verbatim

t0

“subalpine tall-forb vegetation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“This assignment agreed well with the original expert-based classification”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1563–1636 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Similarity-based assignment of the remaining relevés further improved agreement with the expert-based classification compared with formal definitions alone.

Taxon
subalpine tall-forb vegetationt0
Treatment
similarity-based assignmente1
Outcome
agreement with the expert-based classificatione1
Direction
improvede1
Comparator
formal definitionse1

Verbatim

t0

“subalpine tall-forb vegetation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“The agreement with the expert-based classification achieved by the formal definitions was still improved after applying the similarity-based assignment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1977–2128 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A new index based on frequency and fidelity was proposed for calculating similarity between relevé groups.

Taxon
subalpine tall-forb vegetationt0
Outcome
calculating similaritye1

Not reportedComparatorValue

Verbatim

t0

“subalpine tall-forb vegetation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“A new index, based on frequency and fidelity, was proposed for calculating similarity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1890–1975 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The expert-based classification can be successfully formalized and converted into a computer expert system, according to the authors.

Taxon
subalpine tall-forb vegetationt0
Outcome
successfully formalizede1
Comparator
expert-based classificatione1

Not reportedValue

Verbatim

t0

“subalpine tall-forb vegetation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results indicate that the expert-based classification can be successfully formalized and converted into a computer expert system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2130–2258 · show in text ↑