Paper · 2007 · Peanut Science

Peanut Response to Row Pattern and Seed Density when Irrigated with Subsurface Drip Irrigation

Ronald B. Sorensen; Marshall C. Lamb; Christopher L. Butts

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A two year study (2001 and 2002) was conducted at Sasser and Shellman, GA to determine the effects of planting pattern and plant population on the pod yield, market grade, and market value of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) when irrigated with subsurface drip irrigation (SDI). Soils were a Tifton loamy sand (fine-loamy, kaolinitic, thermic Plinthic Kandiudults) and Greenville sandy loam (fine, kaolinitic, thermic Rhodic Kandiudults) with 1% slope. Seeds were planted at recommended (20 seeds/m; 1.0R) and half the recommended rate (10 seeds/m; 0.5R) in a single and twin-row pattern. Plots were irrigated daily to replace estimated daily evapotranspiration (ETa). This study showed that twin-row plant pattern had 490 kg/ha higher pod yield compared with single-row pattern when irrigated using subsurface drip irrigation. The twin-row pattern also had a one percentage point increase in grade value (TSMK) compared with the single-row pattern. There was no difference in kernel size distribution with planting pattern. Twin-row planting had a $213/ha higher market value compared with single-row. There was no difference in yield on market value for seeding rate. This implies that it may be possible for a grower to plant in a twin-row pattern at half the recommended seeding rate without sacrificing net market value but may increase the risk of yield due to TSWV damage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twin-row planting raised peanut pod yield by 490 kg/ha relative to single-row planting.

Treatment
twin-row plant patterne0
Outcome
pod yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
490 kg/hae0
Qualifier
subsurface drip irrigatione0
Comparator
single-row patterne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“twin-row plant pattern had 490 kg/ha higher pod yield compared with single-row pattern when irrigated using subsurface drip irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–822 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twin-row planting increased grade value by one percentage point.

Treatment
twin-row patterne0
Outcome
grade value (TSMK)e0
Direction
increasee0
Value
one percentage pointe0
Comparator
single-row patterne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The twin-row pattern also had a one percentage point increase in grade value (TSMK) compared with the single-row pattern”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–944 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kernel size distribution did not differ by planting pattern.

Treatment
planting patterne0
Outcome
kernel size distributione0
Direction
no differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no difference in kernel size distribution with planting pattern”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1019 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twin-row planting increased peanut market value by $213/ha relative to single-row planting.

Treatment
Twin-row plantinge0
Outcome
market valuee0
Direction
highere0
Value
$213/hae0
Comparator
single-rowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Twin-row planting had a $213/ha higher market value compared with single-row”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1097 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seeding rate did not change yield or market value.

Treatment
seeding ratee0
Outcome
yield on market valuee0
Direction
no differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no difference in yield on market value for seeding rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1164 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest twin-row planting at half the recommended seeding rate might preserve net market value but could raise yield risk from TSWV damage.

Interactor
TSWVOrthotospovirus tomatomaculaee0pathogen
Outcome
plant in a twin-row pattern at half the recommended seeding ratee0
Qualifier
may increase the risk of yield due to TSWV damagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Orthotospovirus tomatomaculae
Orthotospovirus tomatomaculae · InteractorWilliam M. Brown Jr., Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it may be possible for a grower to plant in a twin-row pattern at half the recommended seeding rate without sacrificing net market value but may increase the risk of yield due to TSWV damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1374 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

102 papers: 87 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.