Paper · 2009 · Journal of Food Agriculture & Environment

Effects of tillage method, seed rate and microelement spraying time on grain yield and yield components of rapeseed (Brassica napus) in warm dryland condition

S. Fooladi Vanda; Amir Aynehband; Faraj Ol-Lah Naraki

11
claims
29
verbatim quotes
8
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of different tillage systems (conventional and conservation tillage), seed rate and spraying time on the grain yield and yield components of rapeseed in dryland conditions, this experiment was performed at Agriculture Education Center in Gachsaran during 2007-2008 growing season by RCBD design and strip split plot with 3 replications. Main plots included tillage methods: 1) no-tillage, 2) chisel plow + disk harrow, 3) disk harrow + disk harrow, 4) conventional-till seed drilling, 5) mould board + disk harrow. Sub plots included seed rate with 3 levels, namely 5, 7 and 9 kg/ha, and finally microelements spraying time with 3 levels, namely no spraying, spraying before stem elongation and spraying after flowering. During the growing season yield and yield components of rape seed were recorded. Our results showed that conventional till seed drilling treatment had the highest positive effects on canola yield among treatments. In seed rate treatments, 5 kg/ha exhibited lower yield compared with 7 and 9 kg/ha. There was significant difference between two times spraying (spraying before stem elongation and after flowering) and no spraying on the canola yield. The highest yields were achieved by conventional till seed drilling with 7 kg/ ha seed rate treatment (2957 kg/ha), conventional till seed drilling and spraying before stem elongation treatment (2936 kg/ha) and 7 kg/ha seed rate and spraying before stem elongation (3046 kg/ha), respectively. The least grain yield was recorded in no-tillage treatment with 5 kg/ha seed rate (1317 kg/ha), no-tillage without spraying (1234 kg/ha) and in 5 kg/ha seed rate without spraying (1168 kg/ha), respectively. Generally, planting with conventional-till seed drill device, 7 kg/ha seed rate and spraying before stem elongation were better than the other treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional till seed drilling had the highest positive effect on canola yield among tillage treatments.

Taxon
rapeseede0
Treatment
conventional till seed drillinge1
Outcome
canola yielde1
Direction
highest positive effectse1
Comparator
among treatmentse1

Verbatim

e0

“rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–204 · show in text ↑
e1

“conventional till seed drilling treatment had the highest positive effects on canola yield among treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–988 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 5 kg/ha seed rate yielded less than 7 and 9 kg/ha rates.

Taxon
rapeseede0
Treatment
5 kg/hae1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
lowere1
Comparator
7 and 9 kg/hae1

Verbatim

e0

“rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–204 · show in text ↑
e1

“5 kg/ha exhibited lower yield compared with 7 and 9 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1072 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying before stem elongation differed significantly in yield from no spraying.

Taxon
rapeseede0
Treatment
spraying before stem elongatione1
Outcome
canola yielde1
Comparator
no sprayinge1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–204 · show in text ↑
e1

“There was significant difference between two times spraying (spraying before stem elongation and after flowering) and no spraying on the canola yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1223 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying after flowering differed significantly in yield from no spraying.

Taxon
rapeseede0
Treatment
spraying after floweringe2
Outcome
canola yielde1
Comparator
no sprayinge1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–204 · show in text ↑
e1

“There was significant difference between two times spraying (spraying before stem elongation and after flowering) and no spraying on the canola yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1223 · show in text ↑
e2

“spraying after flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–774 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional till seed drilling with 7 kg/ha seed rate yielded 2957 kg/ha.

Taxon
rapeseede0
Treatment
conventional till seed drilling with 7 kg/ ha seed rate treatmente1
Outcome
yieldse2
Value
2957 kg/hae1

Verbatim

e0

“rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–204 · show in text ↑
e1

“conventional till seed drilling with 7 kg/ ha seed rate treatment (2957 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1339 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest yields were achieved by conventional till seed drilling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1292 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional till seed drilling with spraying before stem elongation yielded 2936 kg/ha.

Taxon
rapeseede0
Treatment
conventional till seed drilling and spraying before stem elongation treatmente1
Outcome
yieldse2
Value
2936 kg/hae1

Verbatim

e0

“rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–204 · show in text ↑
e1

“conventional till seed drilling and spraying before stem elongation treatment (2936 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1431 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest yields were achieved by conventional till seed drilling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1292 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 7 kg/ha seed rate with spraying before stem elongation yielded 3046 kg/ha.

Taxon
rapeseede0
Treatment
7 kg/ha seed rate and spraying before stem elongatione1
Outcome
yieldse2
Value
3046 kg/hae1

Verbatim

e0

“rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–204 · show in text ↑
e1

“7 kg/ha seed rate and spraying before stem elongation (3046 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1436–1502 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest yields were achieved by conventional till seed drilling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1292 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage with 5 kg/ha seed rate yielded 1317 kg/ha, among the lowest.

Taxon
rapeseede0
Treatment
no-tillage treatment with 5 kg/ha seed ratee1
Outcome
grain yielde2
Value
1317 kg/hae1

Verbatim

e0

“rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–204 · show in text ↑
e1

“no-tillage treatment with 5 kg/ha seed rate (1317 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1556–1612 · show in text ↑
e2

“The least grain yield was recorded in no-tillage treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1518–1576 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage without spraying yielded 1234 kg/ha, among the lowest.

Taxon
rapeseede0
Treatment
no-tillage without sprayinge1
Outcome
grain yielde2
Value
1234 kg/hae1

Verbatim

e0

“rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–204 · show in text ↑
e1

“no-tillage without spraying (1234 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1614–1654 · show in text ↑
e2

“The least grain yield was recorded in no-tillage treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1518–1576 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 5 kg/ha seed rate without spraying yielded 1168 kg/ha, among the lowest.

Taxon
rapeseede0
Treatment
5 kg/ha seed rate without sprayinge1
Outcome
grain yielde2
Value
1168 kg/hae1

Verbatim

e0

“rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–204 · show in text ↑
e1

“5 kg/ha seed rate without spraying (1168 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1662–1709 · show in text ↑
e2

“The least grain yield was recorded in no-tillage treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1518–1576 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors favored conventional till seed drilling, 7 kg/ha seed rate and spraying before stem elongation.

Taxon
rapeseede0
Outcome
planting with conventional-till seed drill device, 7 kg/ha seed rate and spraying before stem elongatione1

Verbatim

e0

“rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–204 · show in text ↑
e1

“planting with conventional-till seed drill device, 7 kg/ha seed rate and spraying before stem elongation were better than the other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1736–1878 · show in text ↑

transplanting · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 19 positive, 12 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

tillage · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

50 papers: 42 positive, 8 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.