Paper · 2001 · Annals of Botany

Modulation of Competition between Fruits and Leaves by Flower Pruning and Water Fogging, and Consequences on Tomato Leaf and Fruit Growth

H Gautier

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
65
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The eects of water fogging and reducing plant fruit load were studied in a tomato crop grown in a glasshouse under Mediterranean summer conditions. The objective of these treatments was to reduce competition between leaves and fruits for carbohydrates and water. Flower pruning increased plant leaf area and increased fruit, stem, lamina and petiole dry mass (DM). This indicates that leaf area growth was limited during the summer due to competition between fruits and leaves for assimilates. In contrast, reducing the air vapour pressure decit (VPD) by water fogging had no eect on plant leaf area or aerial plant DM. Interestingly, there was a signicant interaction between plant fruit load and VPD: the higher the leaf : fruit ratio the greater the responses to a reduction in VPD (increase in fruit DM, fruit diameter, fruit and leaf expansion rate). The data suggest that under high fruit loads, water and carbohydrates limit growth under Mediterranean summer conditions. However, reducing VPD was not always sucient to enhance fruit and leaf growth. This might be due to the lower leaf area under high fruit load. In contrast, reducing VPD under low fruit load triggered higher rates of leaf and fruit expansion; this is probably linked to a greater availability of water and carbohydrates.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flower pruning increased tomato leaf area.

Treatment
Flower pruninge0
Outcome
plant leaf areae0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flower pruning increased plant leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–303 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flower pruning increased tomato fruit, stem, lamina and petiole dry mass.

Treatment
Flower pruninge0
Outcome
fruit, stem, lamina and petiole dry masse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flower pruning increased plant leaf area and increased fruit, stem, lamina and petiole dry mass (DM).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–364 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–115 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Competition for assimilates limited summer tomato leaf area growth.

Outcome
leaf area growthe0
Qualifier
competition between fruits and leaves for assimilatese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaf area growth was limited during the summer due to competition between fruits and leaves for assimilates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–493 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water fogging had no effect on tomato leaf area or aerial dry mass.

Treatment
water fogginge0
Outcome
plant leaf area or aerial plant DMe0
Direction
no eecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reducing the air vapour pressure decit (VPD) by water fogging had no eect on plant leaf area or aerial plant DM.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–619 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–115 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The response to reduced VPD was greater at higher leaf to fruit ratios.

Treatment
reduction in VPDe0
Outcome
responses to a reduction in VPDe0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
the higher the leaf : fruit ratioe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the higher the leaf : fruit ratio the greater the responses to a reduction in VPD (increase in fruit DM, fruit diameter, fruit and leaf expansion rate).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–855 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At low fruit load, reduced VPD increased leaf and fruit expansion rates.

Treatment
reducing VPD under low fruit loade0
Outcome
rates of leaf and fruit expansione0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reducing VPD under low fruit load triggered higher rates of leaf and fruit expansion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1218 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–115 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At high fruit load, water and carbohydrates appear to limit tomato growth.

Outcome
growthe0
Qualifier
water and carbohydrates limit growth under Mediterranean summer conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under high fruit loads, water and carbohydrates limit growth under Mediterranean summer conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–977 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–115 · show in text ↑

pruning · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

44 papers: 30 positive, 14 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.