Paper · 2010 · Pest Management Science

Evaluation of alternative rice planthopper control by the combined action of oil‐formulated Metarhizium anisopliae and low‐rate buprofezin

Shao‐Feng Jin; Ming‐Guang Feng; Sheng‐Hua Ying; et al.

7
claims
21
verbatim quotes
25
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High resistance of brown planthopper (BPH) Nilaparvata lugens Stål to common insecticides is a challenge for control of the pest. An alternative control strategy based on the combined application of fungal and chemical agents has been evaluated. RESULTS: Three gradient spore concentrations of oil-formulated Metarhizium anisopliae (Metschnikoff) Sorokin (Ma456) were sprayed onto third-instar nymphs in five bioassays comprising the low buprofezin rates of 0, 10, 20, 30 and 40 µg mL(-1) respectively. Fungal LC(50) after 1 week at 25 °C and 14:10 h light:dark photoperiod decreased from 386 conidia mm(-2) in the buprofezin-free bioassay to 40 at the highest chemical rate. Buprofezin (LC(50): 1647, 486 and 233 µg mL(-1) on days 2 to 4) had no significant effect on the fungal outgrowths of mycosis-killed cadavers at the low application rates. The fungal infection was found to cause 81% reduction in reproductive potential of BPH adults. In two 40 day field trials, significant planthopper (mainly BPH) control (54-60%) was achieved by biweekly sprays of two fungal candidates (Ma456 and Ma576) at 1.5 × 10(13) conidia ha(-1) and elevated to 80-83% by incorporating 30.8 g buprofezin ha(-1) into the fungal sprays. CONCLUSION: The combined application of the fungal and chemical agents is a promising alternative strategy for BPH control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungal LC50 decreased from 386 to 40 conidia per mm2 as buprofezin rate rose to the highest rate.

Treatment
highest chemical ratee1
Interactor
Nilaparvata lugensNilaparvata lugense0pest
Outcome
Fungal LC(50)e1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
40e1
Comparator
buprofezin-free bioassaye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Nilaparvata lugens
Nilaparvata lugens · InteractorNatasha Wright, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Bugwood.org - See more at: http://www.forestryimages.org/browse/detail.cfm?imgnum=51900 · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Evaluation of alternative rice planthopper control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e0

“brown planthopper (BPH) Nilaparvata lugens Stål”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–78 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fungal LC(50) after 1 week at 25 °C and 14:10 h light:dark photoperiod decreased from 386 conidia mm(-2) in the buprofezin-free bioassay to 40 at the highest chemical rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–686 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Low buprofezin rates had no significant effect on fungal outgrowth from mycosis-killed BPH cadavers.

Treatment
Buprofezine2
Interactor
BPHe0pest
Outcome
fungal outgrowths of mycosis-killed cadaverse2
Direction
no significant effecte2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Evaluation of alternative rice planthopper control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e0

“brown planthopper (BPH) Nilaparvata lugens Stål”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–78 · show in text ↑
e2

“Buprofezin (LC(50): 1647, 486 and 233 µg mL(-1) on days 2 to 4) had no significant effect on the fungal outgrowths of mycosis-killed cadavers at the low application rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–858 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Buprofezin LC50 on BPH was 1647, 486 and 233 µg mL(-1) on days 2 to 4.

Interactor
BPHe0pest
Outcome
LC(50)e2
Value
1647, 486 and 233 µg mL(-1)e2
Qualifier
on days 2 to 4e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Evaluation of alternative rice planthopper control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e0

“brown planthopper (BPH) Nilaparvata lugens Stål”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–78 · show in text ↑
e2

“Buprofezin (LC(50): 1647, 486 and 233 µg mL(-1) on days 2 to 4) had no significant effect on the fungal outgrowths of mycosis-killed cadavers at the low application rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–858 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungal infection reduced reproductive potential of BPH adults by 81%.

Treatment
fungal infectione3
Interactor
BPHe3pest
Outcome
reproductive potential of BPH adultse3
Direction
reductione3
Value
81%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Evaluation of alternative rice planthopper control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e0

“brown planthopper (BPH) Nilaparvata lugens Stål”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–78 · show in text ↑
e3

“The fungal infection was found to cause 81% reduction in reproductive potential of BPH adults”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–953 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biweekly sprays of two fungal candidates gave 54-60% planthopper control in two 40-day field trials.

Treatment
biweekly sprays of two fungal candidates (Ma456 and Ma576)e5
Interactor
BPHe0pest
Second interactor
Ma456e5biocontrol_agent
Outcome
planthopper (mainly BPH) controle5
Direction
achievede5
Value
54-60%e5
Setting
field trialse4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Evaluation of alternative rice planthopper control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e0

“brown planthopper (BPH) Nilaparvata lugens Stål”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–78 · show in text ↑
e4

“In two 40 day field trials, significant planthopper (mainly BPH) control (54-60%) was achieved by biweekly sprays of two fungal candidates (Ma456 and Ma576) at 1.5 × 10(13) conidia ha(-1) and elevated to 80-83% by incorporating 30.8 g buprofezin ha(-1) into the fungal sprays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1230 · show in text ↑
e5

“significant planthopper (mainly BPH) control (54-60%) was achieved by biweekly sprays of two fungal candidates (Ma456 and Ma576) at 1.5 × 10(13) conidia ha(-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding 30.8 g buprofezin per hectare to the fungal sprays raised planthopper control to 80-83%.

Treatment
incorporating 30.8 g buprofezin ha(-1) into the fungal sprayse4
Interactor
BPHe0pest
Outcome
planthopper (mainly BPH) controle4
Direction
elevatede4
Value
80-83%e4
Comparator
fungal sprayse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Evaluation of alternative rice planthopper control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e0

“brown planthopper (BPH) Nilaparvata lugens Stål”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–78 · show in text ↑
e4

“In two 40 day field trials, significant planthopper (mainly BPH) control (54-60%) was achieved by biweekly sprays of two fungal candidates (Ma456 and Ma576) at 1.5 × 10(13) conidia ha(-1) and elevated to 80-83% by incorporating 30.8 g buprofezin ha(-1) into the fungal sprays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1230 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The combined fungal and chemical application is a promising strategy for BPH control on rice.

Treatment
combined application of the fungal and chemical agentse6
Interactor
BPHe6pest
Outcome
BPH controle6
Qualifier
promising alternative strategye6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Evaluation of alternative rice planthopper control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e6

“The combined application of the fungal and chemical agents is a promising alternative strategy for BPH control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1354 · show in text ↑

buprofezin · control · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

infection · pest · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · control · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 35 positive, 3 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.