Paper · 2008 · Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems

Grain legume–cereal intercropping: The practical application of diversity, competition and facilitation in arable and organic cropping systems

Henrik Hauggaard-Nielsen; Bjarne Jørnsgaard; Julia Kinane; et al.

13
claims
13
verbatim quotes
388
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

Abstract Intercropping is the simultaneous cultivation of more than one crop species on the same piece of land and is regarded as the practical application of basic ecological principles such as diversity, competition and facilitation. Field experiments were carried out on a sandy loam soil and a sandy soil in Denmark over three consecutive cropping seasons including dual grain legume (pea, faba bean and lupin)–barley intercropping as compared to the respective sole crops (SC). Yield stability of intercrops (IC) was not greater than that of grain legume SC, with the exception of the IC containing faba bean. Faba bean and lupin had lower yield stability than pea and fertilized barley. However, the different IC used environmental resources for plant growth up to 50% (LER=0.91–1.51) more effectively as compared to the respective SC, but with considerable variation over location, years and crops. The SC performance supported the interspecific interactions within the IC stand. On the sandy loam 13% greater grain yield of pea cv. Agadir (520 g m −2 ) was observed as compared to cv. Bohatyr. Faba bean and lupin yielded similarly (340 g m −2 ) in the sandy loam soil, with decreasing yields on the sandy soil (320–270 g m −2 ). Nitrogen fixation was very constant in grain legume SC over species and location, varying from 13.2 to 15.8 g N m −2 , being lowest in peas and highest in faba bean and lupin. The intercropped grain legumes increased the proportion of plant N derived from N 2 -fixation by on average 10–15% compared to the corresponding SC. However, especially lupin was suppressed when intercropping, with a reduced N 2 -fixation from 15 to 5–6 g N m −2 . The IC were particularly effective at suppressing weeds, capturing a greater share of available resources than SC. Weed infestation in the different crops was comparable; however, it tended to be the highest in sole cropped faba bean, lupin and unfertilized barley, where the application of urea to barley reduced the weed infestation by around 50%. Reduction in disease was observed in all IC systems compared to the corresponding SC, with a general disease reduction in the range of 20–40%. For one disease in particular (brown spot on lupin) disease reduction was almost 80% in the IC. Intercropping practices offer many advantages but improved understanding of the ecological mechanisms associated with planned spatial diversity, including additional benefits with associated diversity, is needed to enhance the benefits achieved.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercrop yield stability was generally no greater than sole grain legumes, except faba bean intercrops.

Taxon
grain legumee0
Outcome
Yield stabilitye0
Direction
not greatere0
Qualifier
exception of the IC containing faba beane0
Comparator
grain legume SCe0

Verbatim

e0

“Yield stability of intercrops (IC) was not greater than that of grain legume SC, with the exception of the IC containing faba bean.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–614 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Faba bean and lupin had lower yield stability than pea and fertilized barley.

Taxon
Faba bean and lupinLupinusVicia fabae0
Outcome
yield stabilitye0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
pea and fertilized barleye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lupinus
Lupinus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Jean-Claude Echardour [CC BY-SA], via Tela Botanica · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Faba bean and lupin had lower yield stability than pea and fertilized barley.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–692 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercrops used plant growth resources up to 50% more effectively than sole crops.

Taxon
plante0
Treatment
different ICe0
Outcome
environmental resources for plant growthe0
Direction
more effectivelye0
Value
50%e0
Qualifier
LER=0.91–1.51e0
Comparator
respective SCe0

Verbatim

e0

“the different IC used environmental resources for plant growth up to 50% (LER=0.91–1.51) more effectively as compared to the respective SC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–840 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Agadir pea grain yield on sandy loam was 13% greater than Bohatyr.

Material
cv. Agadire0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Value
13%e0
Qualifier
520 g m −2e0
Comparator
cv. Bohatyre0
Setting
sandy loame0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On the sandy loam 13% greater grain yield of pea cv. Agadir (520 g m −2 ) was observed as compared to cv. Bohatyr.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1101 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Faba bean yield was 340 g m −2 on sandy loam and declined on sandy soil.

Taxon
Faba beanVicia fabae0
Outcome
yieldede0
Direction
decreasinge0
Value
340 g m −2e0
Qualifier
320–270 g m −2e0
Setting
sandy loam soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Faba bean and lupin yielded similarly (340 g m −2 ) in the sandy loam soil, with decreasing yields on the sandy soil (320–270 g m −2 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1237 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lupin yield was 340 g m −2 on sandy loam and declined on sandy soil.

Taxon
lupinLupinuse0
Outcome
yieldede0
Direction
decreasinge0
Value
340 g m −2e0
Qualifier
320–270 g m −2e0
Setting
sandy loam soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lupinus
Lupinus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Jean-Claude Echardour [CC BY-SA], via Tela Botanica · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Faba bean and lupin yielded similarly (340 g m −2 ) in the sandy loam soil, with decreasing yields on the sandy soil (320–270 g m −2 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1237 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole grain legume nitrogen fixation varied from 13.2 to 15.8 g N m −2, lowest in peas and highest in faba bean and lupin.

Taxon
grain legumee0
Outcome
Nitrogen fixatione0
Value
13.2 to 15.8 g N m −2e0
Qualifier
being lowest in peas and highest in faba bean and lupine0

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen fixation was very constant in grain legume SC over species and location, varying from 13.2 to 15.8 g N m −2 , being lowest in peas and highest in faba bean and lupin.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1413 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropped legumes had 10–15% more plant N from N2 fixation than sole legumes.

Taxon
grain legumese0
Treatment
intercroppede0
Outcome
proportion of plant N derived from N 2 -fixatione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10–15%e0
Comparator
corresponding SCe0

Verbatim

e0

“The intercropped grain legumes increased the proportion of plant N derived from N 2 -fixation by on average 10–15% compared to the corresponding SC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1562 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping reduced lupin N2 fixation from 15 to 5–6 g N m −2.

Taxon
lupinLupinuse0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
N 2 -fixatione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
5–6 g N m −2e0
Qualifier
from 15e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lupinus
Lupinus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Jean-Claude Echardour [CC BY-SA], via Tela Botanica · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lupin was suppressed when intercropping, with a reduced N 2 -fixation from 15 to 5–6 g N m −2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1583–1676 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercrops suppressed weeds more effectively than sole crops.

Taxon
ICe0
Treatment
ICe0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
suppressing weedse0
Direction
suppressinge0
Comparator
SCe0

Verbatim

e0

“The IC were particularly effective at suppressing weeds, capturing a greater share of available resources than SC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1679–1793 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea application to barley reduced weed infestation around 50%.

Treatment
application of ureae0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed infestatione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of urea to barley reduced the weed infestation by around 50%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1951–2027 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease was reduced 20–40% across intercrops relative to sole crops.

Taxon
ICe0
Treatment
IC systemse0
Outcome
diseasee0
Direction
Reductione0
Value
20–40%e0
Comparator
corresponding SCe0

Verbatim

e0

“Reduction in disease was observed in all IC systems compared to the corresponding SC, with a general disease reduction in the range of 20–40%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2029–2171 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brown spot on lupin was reduced almost 80% in intercrops.

Taxon
lupinLupinuse0
Treatment
ICe0
Outcome
brown spote0
Direction
reductione0
Value
80%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lupinus
Lupinus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Jean-Claude Echardour [CC BY-SA], via Tela Botanica · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“brown spot on lupin) disease reduction was almost 80% in the IC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2203–2266 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · weed · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 4 positive, 5 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.