Paper · 2013 · Mycologia

The double life of Ceratobasidium : orchid mycorrhizal fungi and their potential for biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani sheath blight of rice

Ana Teresa Mosquera-Espinosa; Paul Bayman; Gustavo A. Prado; et al.

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
79
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Ceratobasidium includes orchid mycorrhizal symbionts, plant pathogens and biocontrol agents of soilborne plant pathogens. It is not known to what extent members of the first guild also can participate in the others. Ceratobasidium spp. were isolated from roots of Colombian orchids and identified by phylogeny based on nrITS sequences. Phylogenetic grouping of Ceratobasidium spp. isolates corresponded to orchid host substrate (epiphytic vs. terrestrial). Isolates were tested for virulence on rice and for biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani, causal agent of sheath blight of rice. All Ceratobasidium spp. isolates caused some signs of sheath blight but significantly less than a pathogenic R. solani used as a positive control. When Ceratobasidium spp. isolates were inoculated on rice seedlings 3 d before R. solani, they significantly reduced disease expression compared to controls inoculated with R. solani alone. The use of Ceratobasidium spp. from orchids for biological control is novel, and biodiverse countries such as Colombia are promising places to look for new biocontrol agents.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ceratobasidium isolate phylogenetic groups corresponded to orchid host substrate.

Taxon
orchide0
Interactor
Ceratobasidium spp.Ceratobasidiume0symbiont
Outcome
Phylogenetic groupinge0
Comparator
epiphytic vs. terrestriale0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ceratobasidium
Ceratobasidium · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryEdward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phylogenetic grouping of Ceratobasidium spp. isolates corresponded to orchid host substrate (epiphytic vs. terrestrial).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–456 · show in text ↑
t0

“orchid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All Ceratobasidium isolates caused some rice sheath blight signs, significantly less than pathogenic R. solani.

Treatment
Ceratobasidium spp. isolatese0
Interactor
Ceratobasidium spp.Ceratobasidiume0pathogen
Outcome
signs of sheath blighte0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
pathogenic R. solanie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ceratobasidium
Ceratobasidium · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryEdward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All Ceratobasidium spp. isolates caused some signs of sheath blight but significantly less than a pathogenic R. solani used as a positive control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–727 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 135–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ceratobasidium inoculation three days before R. solani significantly reduced rice disease expression relative to R. solani alone.

Treatment
Ceratobasidium spp. isolates were inoculatede0
Interactor
R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Second interactor
Ceratobasidium spp.Ceratobasidiume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease expressione0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
3 d before R. solanie0
Comparator
controls inoculated with R. solani alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Ceratobasidium
Ceratobasidium · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryEdward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When Ceratobasidium spp. isolates were inoculated on rice seedlings 3 d before R. solani, they significantly reduced disease expression compared to controls inoculated with R. solani alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–917 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identify Colombia as a promising source of new orchid-derived biocontrol agents.

Taxon
orchidt0
Outcome
promising places to look for new biocontrol agentse0
Setting
Colombiae0

Verbatim

e0

“biodiverse countries such as Colombia are promising places to look for new biocontrol agents.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1092 · show in text ↑
t0

“orchid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–42 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Rhizoctonia solani · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 23 positive, 8 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.