Paper · 2006 · Annals of Botany

Drought, Abscisic Acid and Transpiration Rate Effects on the Regulation of PIP Aquaporin Gene Expression and Abundance in Phaseolus vulgaris Plants

R. AROCA; A. FERRANTE; P. VERNIERI; et al.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
198
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Drought causes a decline of root hydraulic conductance, which aside from embolisms, is governed ultimately by aquaporins. Multiple factors probably regulate aquaporin expression, abundance and activity in leaf and root tissues during drought; among these are the leaf transpiration rate, leaf water status, abscisic acid (ABA) and soil water content. Here a study is made of how these factors could influence the response of aquaporin to drought. METHODS: Three plasma membrane intrinsic proteins (PIPs) or aquaporins were cloned from Phaseolus vulgaris plants and their expression was analysed after 4 d of water deprivation and also 1 d after re-watering. The effects of ABA and of methotrexate (MTX), an inhibitor of stomatal opening, on gene expression and protein abundance were also analysed. Protein abundance was examined using antibodies against PIP1 and PIP2 aquaporins. At the same time, root hydraulic conductance (L), transpiration rate, leaf water status and ABA tissue concentration were measured. KEY RESULTS: None of the treatments (drought, ABA or MTX) changed the leaf water status or tissue ABA concentration. The three treatments caused a decline in the transpiration rate and raised PVPIP2;1 gene expression and PIP1 protein abundance in the leaves. In the roots, only the drought treatment raised the expression of the three PIP genes examined, while at the same time diminishing PIP2 protein abundance and L. On the other hand, ABA raised both root PIP1 protein abundance and L. CONCLUSIONS: The rise of PvPIP2;1 gene expression and PIP1 protein abundance in the leaves of P. vulgaris plants subjected to drought was correlated with a decline in the transpiration rate. At the same time, the increase in the expression of the three PIP genes examined caused by drought and the decline of PIP2 protein abundance in the root tissues were not correlated with any of the parameters measured.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three plasma membrane intrinsic protein (PIP) aquaporin genes were cloned from Phaseolus vulgaris.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise0
Gene
plasma membrane intrinsic proteins (PIPs)e0
Outcome
clonede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three plasma membrane intrinsic proteins (PIPs) or aquaporins were cloned from Phaseolus vulgaris plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–581 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neither drought, ABA nor MTX changed leaf water status or tissue ABA concentration.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
drought, ABA or MTXe1
Outcome
leaf water status or tissue ABA concentratione1
Direction
changede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three plasma membrane intrinsic proteins (PIPs) or aquaporins were cloned from Phaseolus vulgaris plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–581 · show in text ↑
e1

“None of the treatments (drought, ABA or MTX) changed the leaf water status or tissue ABA concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1149 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The three treatments caused a decline in transpiration rate in P. vulgaris.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
drought, ABA or MTXe1
Outcome
transpiration ratee2
Direction
declinee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three plasma membrane intrinsic proteins (PIPs) or aquaporins were cloned from Phaseolus vulgaris plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–581 · show in text ↑
e1

“None of the treatments (drought, ABA or MTX) changed the leaf water status or tissue ABA concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1149 · show in text ↑
e2

“The three treatments caused a decline in the transpiration rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1214 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The three treatments raised PvPIP2;1 gene expression and PIP1 protein abundance in leaves.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise0
Organ / stage
leavese2
Treatment
drought, ABA or MTXe1
Gene
PVPIP2;1e2
Outcome
gene expression and PIP1 protein abundancee2
Direction
raisede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three plasma membrane intrinsic proteins (PIPs) or aquaporins were cloned from Phaseolus vulgaris plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–581 · show in text ↑
e1

“None of the treatments (drought, ABA or MTX) changed the leaf water status or tissue ABA concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1149 · show in text ↑
e2

“raised PVPIP2;1 gene expression and PIP1 protein abundance in the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought alone raised the expression of the three PIP genes in roots.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise0
Organ / stage
rootse1
Treatment
droughte1
Gene
PIP genese1
Outcome
expression of the three PIP genese1
Direction
raisede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three plasma membrane intrinsic proteins (PIPs) or aquaporins were cloned from Phaseolus vulgaris plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–581 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the roots, only the drought treatment raised the expression of the three PIP genes examined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1387 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought diminished PIP2 protein abundance and root hydraulic conductance (L) in roots.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise0
Organ / stage
rootse1
Treatment
droughte1
Outcome
PIP2 protein abundance and Le2
Direction
diminishinge2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three plasma membrane intrinsic proteins (PIPs) or aquaporins were cloned from Phaseolus vulgaris plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–581 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the roots, only the drought treatment raised the expression of the three PIP genes examined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1387 · show in text ↑
e2

“while at the same time diminishing PIP2 protein abundance and L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1452 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ABA raised root PIP1 protein abundance and root hydraulic conductance (L).

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise0
Organ / stage
roote1
Treatment
ABAe1
Outcome
PIP1 protein abundance and Le1
Direction
raisede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three plasma membrane intrinsic proteins (PIPs) or aquaporins were cloned from Phaseolus vulgaris plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–581 · show in text ↑
e1

“On the other hand, ABA raised both root PIP1 protein abundance and L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1454–1522 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The rise of PvPIP2;1 expression and PIP1 abundance in leaves of drought-subjected P. vulgaris was correlated with a decline in transpiration rate.

Taxon
P. vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
subjected to droughte0
Gene
PvPIP2;1e0
Outcome
transpiration ratee0
Direction
declinee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rise of PvPIP2;1 gene expression and PIP1 protein abundance in the leaves of P. vulgaris plants subjected to drought was correlated with a decline in the transpiration rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1537–1713 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: water · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ

24 papers: 8 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.