Paper · 2011 · Journal of Agricultural Science

Nutritional Quality of Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) as Influenced by Mulching, Nitrogen and Irrigation Interval

Aliyu Samaila; Ezra Bako Amans; Ibrahim Umar Abubakar; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

An experiment was conducted in 2006/07 dry season to evaluate the effect of mulching, nitrogen and irrigationinterval on the nutritional quality of Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) at Shika, Nigeria. Treatmentsconsisted of three mulching (no mulch, rice-straw mulch and black polythene mulch) four nitrogen rates (0, 45,90 and 135kgN ha-1) and three irrigation intervals (5, 10 and 15 days). Mulching significantly increased the drymatter, protein and carbohydrate contents in fruits, but decreased the crude fiber content. In most cases rice-strawmulch appeared a better mulching material. N rate of 45kg ha-1 had more dry matter content over control, buthigher values for protein and carbohydrate contents were with 90kg ha-1. The 135kgN ha-1 rate depressedcarbohydrate content. Irrigation interval of 10 days recorded more dry matter and crude fiber while highest fruitcarbohydrate contents was attained at 15 day irrigation interval over the 5-day interval. Delaying irrigationsignificantly depressed fruit protein content. Rice-straw mulch + 90kgN ha-1 or polythene mulch in combinationwith 45kgN ha-1 had more carbohydrate in fruits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching increased fruit dry matter, protein and carbohydrate contents.

Treatment
Mulchinge0
Outcome
drymatter, protein and carbohydrate contentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mulching significantly increased the drymatter, protein and carbohydrate contents in fruits, but decreased the crude fiber content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–528 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching decreased fruit crude fiber content.

Treatment
Mulchinge0
Outcome
crude fiber contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mulching significantly increased the drymatter, protein and carbohydrate contents in fruits, but decreased the crude fiber content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–528 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–60 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice-straw mulch generally performed better than other mulches.

Outcome
better mulching materiale0
Direction
bettere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In most cases rice-strawmulch appeared a better mulching material.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–595 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen at 45kg ha-1 increased dry matter versus control.

Treatment
45kg ha-1e0
Outcome
dry matter contente0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N rate of 45kg ha-1 had more dry matter content over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–656 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen at 90kg ha-1 gave higher protein and carbohydrate contents.

Treatment
90kg ha-1e0
Outcome
protein and carbohydrate contentse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher values for protein and carbohydrate contents were with 90kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–732 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen at 135kgN ha-1 depressed carbohydrate content.

Treatment
135kgN ha-1e0
Outcome
carbohydrate contente0
Direction
depressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 135kgN ha-1 rate depressedcarbohydrate content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–785 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 10-day irrigation interval gave more dry matter and crude fiber.

Treatment
10 dayse0
Outcome
dry matter and crude fibere0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation interval of 10 days recorded more dry matter and crude fiber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–857 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 15-day irrigation interval gave the highest fruit carbohydrate content versus 5 days.

Treatment
15 day irrigation intervale0
Outcome
fruitcarbohydrate contentse0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
5-day intervale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest fruitcarbohydrate contents was attained at 15 day irrigation interval over the 5-day interval”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–965 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying irrigation significantly depressed fruit protein content.

Treatment
Delaying irrigatione0
Outcome
fruit protein contente0
Direction
depressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Delaying irrigationsignificantly depressed fruit protein content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1032 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice-straw mulch with 90kgN ha-1 gave more fruit carbohydrate.

Treatment
Rice-straw mulch + 90kgN ha-1e0
Outcome
carbohydrate in fruitse0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rice-straw mulch + 90kgN ha-1 or polythene mulch in combinationwith 45kgN ha-1 had more carbohydrate in fruits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1144 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polythene mulch with 45kgN ha-1 gave more fruit carbohydrate.

Treatment
polythene mulch in combinationwith 45kgN ha-1e0
Outcome
carbohydrate in fruitse0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rice-straw mulch + 90kgN ha-1 or polythene mulch in combinationwith 45kgN ha-1 had more carbohydrate in fruits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1144 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–60 · show in text ↑

poly(ethylene) · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mulching · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

irrigation · quality: protein · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

mulching · quality: grain · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.