Paper · 2008 · Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science

Cultivation of flax in spoil‐bank clay: Mycorrhizal inoculation vs. high organic amendments

David Püschel; Jana Rydlová; Radka Sudová; et al.

5
claims
14
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract A greenhouse experiment was focused on the application of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) in effective crop production during reclamation of coal‐mine spoil banks. The aim of the study was to find out whether mycorrhizal inoculation improves growth of flax ( Linum usitatissimum L.) and whether it can compensate for high doses of expensive organic amendment. Flax was planted in original spoil‐bank gray Miocene clay amended with organic matter used for spoil‐bank reclamation (mixture of composted urban waste and lignocellulose papermill waste). This amendment was applied in four descending doses equivalent to the application of 500, 200, 100, and 0 t ha –1 . The plants received either a mixed inoculum of three AMF species ( Glomus mosseae, G. claroideum , and G. intraradices ) or were left uninoculated. Growth of flax was significantly increased by mycorrhizal inoculation in pure clay (by 60%) as well as in clay with all amendment doses (by 119% on average). Also, the addition of organic matter increased plant growth but, interestingly, the biomass production was comparable regardless the dose of amendment. Our results suggest that similar yields are attainable with only one fifth of the usual fertilization dose, which can significantly decrease costs related to the reclamation of spoil banks. If mycorrhizal inoculation is applied together with the optimized fertilization, growth of flax planted in spoil‐bank clay can be further improved.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation increased flax growth by 60% in pure spoil-bank clay.

Treatment
mycorrhizal inoculatione1
Interactor
AMFe2symbiont
Outcome
Growthe1
Direction
increasede1
Value
60%e1
Comparator
uninoculatede3
Setting
pure claye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cultivation of flax”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–19 · show in text ↑
e1

“Growth of flax was significantly increased by mycorrhizal inoculation in pure clay (by 60%) as well as in clay with all amendment doses (by 119% on average)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–981 · show in text ↑
e2

“The plants received either a mixed inoculum of three AMF species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–741 · show in text ↑
e3

“or were left uninoculated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–823 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation increased flax growth by 119% on average in clay with all organic amendment doses.

Treatment
mycorrhizal inoculatione1
Interactor
AMFe2symbiont
Outcome
Growthe1
Direction
increasede1
Value
119% on averagee1
Comparator
uninoculatede3
Setting
clay with all amendment dosese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cultivation of flax”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–19 · show in text ↑
e1

“Growth of flax was significantly increased by mycorrhizal inoculation in pure clay (by 60%) as well as in clay with all amendment doses (by 119% on average)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–981 · show in text ↑
e2

“The plants received either a mixed inoculum of three AMF species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–741 · show in text ↑
e3

“or were left uninoculated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–823 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Addition of organic matter increased flax plant growth.

Treatment
addition of organic mattere4
Outcome
plant growthe4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cultivation of flax”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–19 · show in text ↑
e4

“Also, the addition of organic matter increased plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1042 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biomass production of flax was comparable regardless of the amendment dose.

Treatment
dose of amendmente5
Outcome
biomass productione5
Direction
comparablee5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cultivation of flax”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–19 · show in text ↑
e5

“the biomass production was comparable regardless the dose of amendment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Similar flax yields are attainable with one fifth of the usual fertilization dose.

Treatment
one fifth of the usual fertilization dosee6
Outcome
yieldse6
Direction
similare6
Comparator
usual fertilization dosee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cultivation of flax”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–19 · show in text ↑
e6

“Our results suggest that similar yields are attainable with only one fifth of the usual fertilization dose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1241 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Results differ

95 papers: 84 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 84 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

91 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

other · yield · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · growth · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.