Paper · 2010 · Australian Journal of Crop Science

Response of Organic Linseed ('Linum usitatissimum' L.) to the Combination of Tillage Systems, (Minimum, Conventional and No-Tillage) and Fertilization Practices: Seed and Oil Yield Production

Dimitrios Bilalis; Anestis Karkanis; Panayiota Papastylianou; et al.

9
claims
20
verbatim quotes
25
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Limited tillage systems, especially no-tillage, have become widespread in recent years. The no-tillage practice is widely adopted worldwide for erosion control and to maintain soil fertility. Field experiments were conducted to determine the effects of tillage systems and organic fertilization on the growth, yield and oil content of flax crop (Linum usitatissimum L.). The experiments, conducted during 2009 and 2010, were laid out in a split plot design with four replicates, three main plots (conventional tillage, minimum tillage and no-tillage) and the three sub-plots (compost, vetch and faba bean as green manure). The soil organic matter and total nitrogen were higher in soils subjected to conservation tillage systems (minimum and no-tillage) than under conventional tillage. The highest leaf area index (LAI), dry weight and arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) root colonization was found in conservation tillage systems. There were no significant differences between the organic fertilization treatments concerning the LAI, dry weight and AM root colonization. There were significant differences for root growth between the tillage systems. The highest root weight was found in the no-tillage system. Moreover, the highest seed yield (1761 kg ha-1) and oil yield (670 kg ha-1) were found with minimum tillage. There were statistically significant differences between minimum tillage and conventional tillage. Vetch and faba bean green manures had a significant effect on oil content. A high correlation was observed between oil yield and oil content. Our results indicated that conservation tillage systems enhance organic matter in soils and increase oil yield of flax.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil organic matter and total nitrogen were higher under conservation tillage (minimum and no-tillage) than conventional tillage in the flax experiment.

Taxon
Linum usitatissimumLinum usitatissimumt0
Treatment
conservation tillage systemse1
Outcome
soil organic matter and total nitrogene1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
conventional tillagee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Linum usitatissimum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–49 · show in text ↑
e1

“The soil organic matter and total nitrogen were higher in soils subjected to conservation tillage systems (minimum and no-tillage) than under conventional tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–785 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area index, dry weight and AM root colonization of flax were highest under conservation tillage systems.

Taxon
Linum usitatissimumLinum usitatissimumt0
Treatment
conservation tillage systemse2
Interactor
arbuscular mycorrhizale2symbiont
Outcome
leaf area index (LAI), dry weight and arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) root colonizatione2
Direction
higheste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Linum usitatissimum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–49 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest leaf area index (LAI), dry weight and arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) root colonization was found in conservation tillage systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–924 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilization treatments did not differ significantly in flax LAI, dry weight and AM root colonization.

Taxon
Linum usitatissimumLinum usitatissimumt0
Treatment
organic fertilization treatmentse3
Interactor
AMe3symbiont
Outcome
LAI, dry weight and AM root colonizatione3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Linum usitatissimum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–49 · show in text ↑
e3

“There were no significant differences between the organic fertilization treatments concerning the LAI, dry weight and AM root colonization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1064 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Flax root growth differed significantly between tillage systems.

Taxon
Linum usitatissimumLinum usitatissimumt0
Treatment
tillage systemse4
Outcome
root growthe4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Linum usitatissimum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–49 · show in text ↑
e4

“There were significant differences for root growth between the tillage systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest flax root weight was found under no-tillage.

Taxon
Linum usitatissimumLinum usitatissimumt0
Treatment
no-tillage systeme5
Outcome
root weighte5
Direction
higheste5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Linum usitatissimum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–49 · show in text ↑
e5

“The highest root weight was found in the no-tillage system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1204 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum tillage gave the highest flax seed yield, 1761 kg ha-1, with a significant difference from conventional tillage.

Taxon
Linum usitatissimumLinum usitatissimumt0
Treatment
minimum tillagee6
Outcome
seed yielde6
Direction
higheste6
Value
1761 kg ha-1e6
Comparator
conventional tillagee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Linum usitatissimum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–49 · show in text ↑
e6

“the highest seed yield (1761 kg ha-1) and oil yield (670 kg ha-1) were found with minimum tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1313 · show in text ↑
e7

“There were statistically significant differences between minimum tillage and conventional tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1315–1412 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum tillage gave the highest flax oil yield, 670 kg ha-1, with a significant difference from conventional tillage.

Taxon
Linum usitatissimumLinum usitatissimumt0
Treatment
minimum tillagee6
Outcome
oil yielde6
Direction
higheste6
Value
670 kg ha-1e6
Comparator
conventional tillagee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Linum usitatissimum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–49 · show in text ↑
e6

“the highest seed yield (1761 kg ha-1) and oil yield (670 kg ha-1) were found with minimum tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1313 · show in text ↑
e7

“There were statistically significant differences between minimum tillage and conventional tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1315–1412 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vetch and faba bean green manures had a significant effect on flax oil content.

Taxon
Linum usitatissimumLinum usitatissimumt0
Treatment
Vetch and faba bean green manurese0
Outcome
oil contente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Linum usitatissimum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–49 · show in text ↑
e0

“Vetch and faba bean green manures had a significant effect on oil content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1487 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flax oil yield was highly correlated with oil content.

Taxon
Linum usitatissimumLinum usitatissimumt0
Compound
oil contente4
Outcome
oil yielde4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Schema note from the model: related variable has no matching field; placed in compound

Verbatim

t0

“Linum usitatissimum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–49 · show in text ↑
e4

“A high correlation was observed between oil yield and oil content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1489–1554 · show in text ↑

tillage · growth · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

tillage · yield · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

fertilization · growth · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 24 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

tillage · quality: oil · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
    Terminal cuttings produced seed with higher linolenic acid content.

    VEGETATIVE PROPAGATION OF FLAX BY STEM CUTTINGS · 1974 · compared with cuttings from other positions on the plant

    Same direction

See all 2 papers →

tillage · nutrient: content · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.