Paper · 2000 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Effect of industrial processing on chlorophyll content of broccoli

M Antonia Murcia; Beatriz López-Ayerra; Magdalena Martínez-Tomé; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
39
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Chlorophylls a and b and pheophytins a and b were quantitaty determined in raw, frozen (after blanching for 60, 120 or 150 s) and canned florets and stems of broccoli. The chlorophyll a and b contents were 0.11 and 0.043 g kg−1 fresh weight respectively in raw florets and 0.036 and 0.018 g kg−1 respectively in stems. About 37.8% and 61.1% losses were incurred during the freezing process in florets and stems respectively, and 98.5% after canning as a consequence of industrial processing. After different blanching times the losses of chlorophyll a in frozen florets varied between 17.7 and 66.4%, while the losses of chlorophyll b varied between 23.2 and 48.8%. In the losses ranged from 55.5 to 75% and from 50 to 88.9% for chlorophylls a and b respectively. These losses resulted in an increase in pheophytin a and b levels in both florets and stems. © 2000 Society of Chemical Industry

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raw broccoli florets contained chlorophyll a at 0.11 g kg−1 fresh weight.

Organ / stage
floretse0
Outcome
chlorophyll ae0
Value
0.11e0
Qualifier
g kg−1 fresh weighte0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The chlorophyll a and b contents were 0.11 and 0.043 g kg−1 fresh weight respectively in raw florets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–268 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raw broccoli florets contained chlorophyll b at 0.043 g kg−1 fresh weight.

Organ / stage
floretse0
Outcome
b contentse0
Value
0.043 g kg−1 fresh weighte0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The chlorophyll a and b contents were 0.11 and 0.043 g kg−1 fresh weight respectively in raw florets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–268 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broccoli stems contained chlorophyll a at 0.036 g kg−1.

Organ / stage
stemse0
Outcome
chlorophyll ae0
Value
0.036e0
Qualifier
g kg−1e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The chlorophyll a and b contents were 0.11 and 0.043 g kg−1 fresh weight respectively in raw florets and 0.036 and 0.018 g kg−1 respectively in stems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–318 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broccoli stems contained chlorophyll b at 0.018 g kg−1.

Organ / stage
stemse0
Outcome
b contentse0
Value
0.018 g kg−1e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The chlorophyll a and b contents were 0.11 and 0.043 g kg−1 fresh weight respectively in raw florets and 0.036 and 0.018 g kg−1 respectively in stems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–318 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Freezing caused about 37.8% pigment loss in florets.

Organ / stage
floretse0
Treatment
freezing processe0
Outcome
chlorophyll contentt0
Direction
lossese0
Value
37.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“About 37.8% and 61.1% losses were incurred during the freezing process in florets and stems respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–423 · show in text ↑
t0

“chlorophyll content of broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Freezing caused about 61.1% pigment loss in stems.

Organ / stage
stemse0
Treatment
freezing processe0
Outcome
chlorophyll contentt0
Direction
lossese0
Value
61.1%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“About 37.8% and 61.1% losses were incurred during the freezing process in florets and stems respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–423 · show in text ↑
t0

“chlorophyll content of broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canning caused 98.5% pigment loss.

Treatment
canninge0
Outcome
chlorophyll contentt0
Direction
lossese0
Value
98.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“About 37.8% and 61.1% losses were incurred during the freezing process in florets and stems respectively, and 98.5% after canning as a consequence of industrial processing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–491 · show in text ↑
t0

“chlorophyll content of broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After different blanching times, frozen floret chlorophyll a losses ranged from 17.7 to 66.4%.

Organ / stage
floretse0
Treatment
different blanching timese0
Outcome
chlorophyll ae0
Direction
lossese0
Value
17.7 and 66.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After different blanching times the losses of chlorophyll a in frozen florets varied between 17.7 and 66.4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–599 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Frozen floret chlorophyll b losses ranged from 23.2 to 48.8%.

Organ / stage
floretse0
Treatment
different blanching timese0
Outcome
chlorophyll be0
Direction
lossese0
Value
23.2 and 48.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After different blanching times the losses of chlorophyll a in frozen florets varied between 17.7 and 66.4%, while the losses of chlorophyll b varied between 23.2 and 48.8%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–665 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll a losses ranged from 55.5 to 75%, with the organ unresolved in the damaged sentence.

Outcome
chlorophylls ae0
Direction
lossese0
Value
55.5 to 75%e0

Not reportedOrgan / stage

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the losses ranged from 55.5 to 75% and from 50 to 88.9% for chlorophylls a and b respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–763 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll b losses ranged from 50 to 88.9%, with the organ unresolved in the damaged sentence.

Outcome
be0
Direction
lossese0
Value
50 to 88.9%e0

Not reportedOrgan / stage

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the losses ranged from 55.5 to 75% and from 50 to 88.9% for chlorophylls a and b respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–763 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigment losses resulted in increased pheophytin a and b levels in florets and stems.

Organ / stage
florets and stemse0
Outcome
pheophytin a and b levelse0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
These lossese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These losses resulted in an increase in pheophytin a and b levels in both florets and stems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–856 · show in text ↑
t0

“broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 · show in text ↑

cold · physiology: pigments · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results differ

11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

processing · physiology: pigments · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.