Paper · 2011 · Journal of Insect Science

Potential use of the Bushmint,Hyptis suaveolens, for the Control of Infestation by the Pink Stalk Borer,Sesamia calamistison Maize in Southern Benin, West Africa

Cyrille Adda; Pierre Atachi; Kerstin Hell; et al.

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
27
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Maize production in Benin, especially in resource-poor farmers' fields, is constrained by stemborers among other factors. One of the major stemborers in southern Benin is Sesamia calamistis Hampson (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). African farmers cannot afford to use commercial insecticides for controlling stemborers - they are expensive and unsuitable for durable pest management systems due to eco-toxicity. There is therefore a need for cheaper and environmentally friendly methods and botanicals offer an attractive alternative. The bushmint, Hyptis suaveolens (L.) Poit. (Lamiales: Lamiaceae), was compared with the commercial insecticide Furadan (carbofuran) for the control of S. calamistis on maize Zea mays L. (Poales: Poaceae). Trials were conducted in the screenhouse and in the field during the minor cropping season in 2004 at the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA)-Benin station. The variables measured included numbers of egg masses per plant, eggs per egg mass (in the screenhouse study), population density of S. calamistis, percentage of infested plants and/or ears, and deadhearts in the field. Irrespective of the variable considered, the aqueous extract of H. suaveolens compared favorably with Furadan while maize surrounded by live H. suaveolens plants had lower S. calamistis densities.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bushmint aqueous extract performed comparably to Furadan across measured pest variables.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
aqueous extract of H. suaveolense0
Interactor
S. calamistisSesamia calamistise1pest
Second interactor
H. suaveolensMesosphaerum suaveolense0other
Outcome
compared favorablye0
Direction
compared favorablye0
Comparator
Furadane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Mesosphaerum suaveolens
Mesosphaerum suaveolens · Second interactorAlex Popovkin, Bahia, Brazil from Brazil · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the aqueous extract of H. suaveolens compared favorably with Furadan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1238 · show in text ↑
e1

“the control of S. calamistis on maize Zea mays L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–713 · show in text ↑
e2

“Irrespective of the variable considered”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1168 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize surrounded by live bushmint had lower stalk borer densities.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
surrounded by live H. suaveolens plantse0
Interactor
S. calamistisSesamia calamistise0pest
Second interactor
H. suaveolensMesosphaerum suaveolense0other
Outcome
S. calamistis densitiese0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Mesosphaerum suaveolens
Mesosphaerum suaveolens · Second interactorAlex Popovkin, Bahia, Brazil from Brazil · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize surrounded by live H. suaveolens plants had lower S. calamistis densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1245–1324 · show in text ↑

botanical · Sesamia calamistis · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.