Paper · 2008 · Weed Technology

Second-generation Glyphosate-Resistant Cotton Tolerance to Combinations of Glyphosate with Insecticides and Mepiquat Chloride

Donnie K. Miller; Jimmy X. Zumba; David C. Blouin; et al.

8
claims
12
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field trials were conducted in 2005 and 2006 to evaluate application of glyphosate alone or plus the plant growth regulator mepiquat chloride with 20 different insecticides to second-generation glyphosate-resistant cotton at the pinhead square or first bloom growth stages. At 7 DAT, averaged across cotton growth stages and herbicide treatments, combination with insecticides profenofos and methomyl resulted in 5 and 9% plant injury, respectively, and were the only insecticide combinations that resulted in injury greater than glyphosate or glyphosate plus mepiquat chloride applied alone. By 14 DAT, cotton injury was less than 2% for all treatments. Averaged across cotton growth stages and insecticides, addition of mepiquat chloride to glyphosate resulted in a 4 and 6 cm height reduction at 7 and 28 DAT, respectively. Seed cotton yield and percent first harvest were similar for all treatments, indicating that cotton injury and height reductions observed after application did not result in yield reductions or maturity delays. Glyphosate combined with insecticides and mepiquat chloride, in accordance with herbicide labeling for second-generation glyphosate-resistant cotton, offers producers the ability to integrate pest and crop management strategies and reduce application costs with minimal effect on the crop.Nomenclature: Acephate, acetamiprid, bifenthrin, cyfluthrin, cypermethrin, dicrotophos, dimethoate, emamectin benzoate, gamma-cyhalothrin, glyphosate, imidacloprid, indoxacarb, lambda-cyhalothrin, mepiquat chloride, methomyl, novaluron, oxamyl, profenofos, spinosad, thiamethoxam, thiodicarb, zeta-cypermethrin, cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Profenofos with glyphosate caused 5% cotton injury at 7 DAT.

Treatment
profenofose1
Outcome
plant injurye1
Direction
greatere1
Value
5e1
Comparator
glyphosate or glyphosate plus mepiquat chloride applied alonee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to second-generation glyphosate-resistant cotton at the pinhead square”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 173–243 · show in text ↑
e1

“combination with insecticides profenofos and methomyl resulted in 5 and 9% plant injury, respectively, and were the only insecticide combinations that resulted in injury greater than glyphosate or glyphosate plus mepiquat chloride applied alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 347–591 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methomyl with glyphosate caused 9% cotton injury at 7 DAT.

Treatment
methomyle1
Outcome
plant injurye1
Direction
greatere1
Value
9%e1
Comparator
glyphosate or glyphosate plus mepiquat chloride applied alonee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to second-generation glyphosate-resistant cotton at the pinhead square”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 173–243 · show in text ↑
e1

“combination with insecticides profenofos and methomyl resulted in 5 and 9% plant injury, respectively, and were the only insecticide combinations that resulted in injury greater than glyphosate or glyphosate plus mepiquat chloride applied alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 347–591 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton injury was below 2% for all treatments by 14 DAT.

Outcome
cotton injurye0
Direction
less thane0
Value
2%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“By 14 DAT, cotton injury was less than 2% for all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–653 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mepiquat chloride added to glyphosate reduced cotton height by 4 cm at 7 DAT.

Treatment
addition of mepiquat chloride to glyphosatee1
Outcome
heighte1
Direction
reductione1
Value
4e1
Qualifier
7e1
Comparator
glyphosatee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to second-generation glyphosate-resistant cotton at the pinhead square”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 173–243 · show in text ↑
e1

“addition of mepiquat chloride to glyphosate resulted in a 4 and 6 cm height reduction at 7 and 28 DAT, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–825 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mepiquat chloride added to glyphosate reduced cotton height by 6 cm at 28 DAT.

Treatment
addition of mepiquat chloride to glyphosatee1
Outcome
heighte1
Direction
reductione1
Value
6 cme1
Qualifier
28 DATe1
Comparator
glyphosatee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to second-generation glyphosate-resistant cotton at the pinhead square”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 173–243 · show in text ↑
e1

“addition of mepiquat chloride to glyphosate resulted in a 4 and 6 cm height reduction at 7 and 28 DAT, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–825 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed cotton yield was similar across treatments.

Treatment
all treatmentse0
Outcome
Seed cotton yielde0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
all treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed cotton yield and percent first harvest were similar for all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–902 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Percent first harvest was similar across treatments.

Treatment
all treatmentse0
Outcome
percent first harveste0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
all treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed cotton yield and percent first harvest were similar for all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–902 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude the combinations allow integrated pest and crop management with minimal crop effect and lower application costs.

Treatment
Glyphosate combined with insecticides and mepiquat chloridee1
Outcome
integrate pest and crop management strategies and reduce application costse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Glyphosate combined with insecticides and mepiquat chloride, in accordance with herbicide labeling for second-generation glyphosate-resistant cotton, offers producers the ability to integrate pest and crop management strategies and reduce application costs with minimal effect on the crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1326 · show in text ↑

glyphosate · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

13 papers: 4 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

mepiquat chloride · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 38 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

chloride · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

51 papers: 40 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.