Abstract

The mechanistic basis for differential sensitivities to chilling‐induced photoinhibition among two rice ( Oryza sativa L.) cultivars (an Indica and a Japonica type) and one barley cultivar ( Hordeum vulgare L. cv. Albori) was examined. When leaf segments were exposed to moderate illumination at 4°C, a sustained decrease in the photochemical efficiency of photosystem (PS) II measured as the ratio of variable to maximal fluorescence (F v /F m ) was observed for several hours. An analysis of fluorescence quenching revealed a sudden drop in PSII‐driven electron transport rate (ETR) and a rapid rise in the reduction state of the primary electron acceptor Q A upon exposure to chilling in moderate light. There was no appreciable difference in the level of non‐photochemical quenching (NPQ) nor in the xanthophyll cycle activity between Japonica rice and barley. However, barley was capable of sustaining a higher ETR, thereby keeping a lower reduction state of Q A throughout the chilling for 6 h. The Indica rice was characterized by the lowest ability to develop the xanthophyll cycle‐associated NPQ, particularly the fast relaxing NPQ component (qf), accompanied by the highest reduction state of Q A and photoinhibitory quenching (qI). It is concluded that the lower susceptibility of barley to chilling‐induced photoinhibition than Japonica rice is attributable to its higher potential to dissipate excess light energy via a photochemical mechanism, whereas Indica rice is more sensitive to photoinhibition at a chilling temperature than Japonica rice, due primarily to its lower capacity to develop an efficient NPQ pathway.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilling in moderate light at 4°C caused a sustained decrease in PSII photochemical efficiency in rice and barley leaf segments.

Taxon
rice and barleyHordeum vulgareOryza sativat0
Treatment
moderate illumination at 4°Ce1
Outcome
photochemical efficiencye1
Direction
sustained decreasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Relative contributions of photochemical and non‐photochemical routes to excitation energy dissipation in rice and barley illuminated at a chilling temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–158 · show in text ↑
e1

“When leaf segments were exposed to moderate illumination at 4°C, a sustained decrease in the photochemical efficiency of photosystem (PS) II”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–376 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley sustained a higher electron transport rate than the other cultivars throughout chilling for 6 h.

Taxon
Hordeum vulgare L.Hordeum vulgaree0
Material
cv. Alborie0
Outcome
ETRe2
Direction
highere2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“among two rice ( Oryza sativa L.) cultivars (an Indica and a Japonica type) and one barley cultivar ( Hordeum vulgare L. cv. Albori) was examined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–234 · show in text ↑
e2

“However, barley was capable of sustaining a higher ETR, thereby keeping a lower reduction state of Q A throughout the chilling for 6 h”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–999 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley kept a lower reduction state of Q A throughout chilling for 6 h.

Taxon
Hordeum vulgare L.Hordeum vulgaree0
Material
cv. Alborie0
Outcome
reduction state of Q Ae2
Direction
lowere2
Qualifier
throughout the chilling for 6 he2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“among two rice ( Oryza sativa L.) cultivars (an Indica and a Japonica type) and one barley cultivar ( Hordeum vulgare L. cv. Albori) was examined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–234 · show in text ↑
e2

“However, barley was capable of sustaining a higher ETR, thereby keeping a lower reduction state of Q A throughout the chilling for 6 h”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–999 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indica rice had the lowest ability to develop xanthophyll cycle-associated NPQ.

Taxon
Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativae0
Material
Indicae3
Outcome
NPQe3
Direction
loweste3
Qualifier
particularly the fast relaxing NPQ component (qf)e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“among two rice ( Oryza sativa L.) cultivars (an Indica and a Japonica type) and one barley cultivar ( Hordeum vulgare L. cv. Albori) was examined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–234 · show in text ↑
e3

“The Indica rice was characterized by the lowest ability to develop the xanthophyll cycle‐associated NPQ, particularly the fast relaxing NPQ component (qf), accompanied by the highest reduction state of Q A and photoinhibitory quenching (qI).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1242 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indica rice had the highest reduction state of Q A and photoinhibitory quenching (qI).

Taxon
Oryza sativa L.Oryza sativae0
Material
Indicae3
Outcome
reduction state of Q A and photoinhibitory quenching (qI)e3
Direction
higheste3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“among two rice ( Oryza sativa L.) cultivars (an Indica and a Japonica type) and one barley cultivar ( Hordeum vulgare L. cv. Albori) was examined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–234 · show in text ↑
e3

“The Indica rice was characterized by the lowest ability to develop the xanthophyll cycle‐associated NPQ, particularly the fast relaxing NPQ component (qf), accompanied by the highest reduction state of Q A and photoinhibitory quenching (qI).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1242 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley is less susceptible to chilling photoinhibition than Japonica rice because of its higher photochemical dissipation potential.

Outcome
lower susceptibilitye4
Qualifier
higher potential to dissipate excess light energy via a photochemical mechanisme4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“It is concluded that the lower susceptibility of barley to chilling‐induced photoinhibition than Japonica rice is attributable to its higher potential to dissipate excess light energy via a photochemical mechanism, whereas Indica rice is more sensitive to photoinhibition at a chilling temperature than Japonica rice, due primarily to its lower capacity to develop an efficient NPQ pathway.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1633 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indica rice is more sensitive to photoinhibition than Japonica rice at chilling temperature because of its lower NPQ capacity.

Outcome
more sensitive to photoinhibitione4
Qualifier
due primarily to its lower capacity to develop an efficient NPQ pathwaye4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa Indica Group
Oryza sativa Indica Group · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Ranveig assumed (based on copyright claims). · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“It is concluded that the lower susceptibility of barley to chilling‐induced photoinhibition than Japonica rice is attributable to its higher potential to dissipate excess light energy via a photochemical mechanism, whereas Indica rice is more sensitive to photoinhibition at a chilling temperature than Japonica rice, due primarily to its lower capacity to develop an efficient NPQ pathway.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1633 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley and Japonica rice did not differ appreciably in non-photochemical quenching or xanthophyll cycle activity.

Outcome
xanthophyll cycle activitye5
Direction
no appreciable differencee5
Comparator
Japonica ricee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“There was no appreciable difference in the level of non‐photochemical quenching (NPQ) nor in the xanthophyll cycle activity between Japonica rice and barley.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–864 · show in text ↑

light · physiology: photosynthesis · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

47 papers: 24 positive, 23 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

light · physiology: photosynthesis · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 7 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.