Paper · 1984 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

A study of the migration of externally applied sucrose esters of fatty acids through the skins of banana, apple and pear fruits

C. Lal Bhardwaj; Haydn F. Jones; Ian H. Smith

10
claims
13
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract [ 14 C]‐Labelled sucrose esters of fatty acids were prepared and included in a fruit coating which retarded ripening. The esters remained substantially intact on the surfaces of bananas, apples and pears during storage at 17 or 18°C for up to at least 30 days. The amounts of sucrose esters in the coatings applied to the surfaces of fruits were 250 mg m −2 for the banana, 681 mg m −2 for Cox's Orange Pippin apple, 617 mg m −2 for Conference pear and 362 mg m −2 for Comice pear. Analysis for radioactivity in the pulpy tissue of coated fruits stored for up to 41 days showed a low concentration of migrated label, which was difficult to distinguish from background. It was concluded that the concentrations of sucrose esters in the pulpy tissue were not more than 10 ng g −1 for banana, 350 ng g −1 for apple, 300 ng g −1 for Conference pear and 70 ng g −1 for Comice pear, and that the mode of action of sucrose esters in the retardation of ripening seems unlikely to be dependent upon their migration into the pulpy tissue.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The sucrose ester coating retarded fruit ripening.

Taxon
banana, apple and pear fruitst0
Treatment
fruit coatinge0
Outcome
ripeninge0
Direction
retardede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“banana, apple and pear fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“included in a fruit coating which retarded ripening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose esters remained substantially intact on banana surfaces during storage.

Taxon
bananase0
Organ / stage
surfacese0
Outcome
esters remained substantially intacte0
Qualifier
during storage at 17 or 18°C for up to at least 30 dayse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The esters remained substantially intact on the surfaces of bananas, apples and pears during storage at 17 or 18°C for up to at least 30 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–268 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose esters remained substantially intact on apple surfaces during storage.

Organ / stage
surfacese0
Outcome
esters remained substantially intacte0
Qualifier
during storage at 17 or 18°C for up to at least 30 dayse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The esters remained substantially intact on the surfaces of bananas, apples and pears during storage at 17 or 18°C for up to at least 30 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–268 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose esters remained substantially intact on pear surfaces during storage.

Taxon
pearsPyruse0
Organ / stage
surfacese0
Outcome
esters remained substantially intacte0
Qualifier
during storage at 17 or 18°C for up to at least 30 dayse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus
Pyrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)JLPC · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The esters remained substantially intact on the surfaces of bananas, apples and pears during storage at 17 or 18°C for up to at least 30 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–268 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Migrated label in coated fruit pulp was low and difficult to distinguish from background.

Taxon
banana, apple and pear fruitst0
Organ / stage
pulpy tissuee0
Outcome
low concentration of migrated labele0
Direction
lowe0
Qualifier
stored for up to 41 dayse0

Verbatim

t0

“banana, apple and pear fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“Analysis for radioactivity in the pulpy tissue of coated fruits stored for up to 41 days showed a low concentration of migrated label, which was difficult to distinguish from background”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–676 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose ester concentration in banana pulp was at most 10 ng g −1.

Taxon
bananae0
Outcome
concentrations of sucrose esters in the pulpy tissuee0
Direction
not more thane0
Value
10 ng g −1e0

Verbatim

e0

“concentrations of sucrose esters in the pulpy tissue were not more than 10 ng g −1 for banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–797 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose ester concentration in apple pulp was at most 350 ng g −1.

Outcome
concentrations of sucrose esters in the pulpy tissuee0
Direction
not more thane0
Value
350 ng g −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“concentrations of sucrose esters in the pulpy tissue were not more than 10 ng g −1 for banana, 350 ng g −1 for apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–820 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose ester concentration in Conference pear pulp was at most 300 ng g −1.

Taxon
Conference peare0
Material
Conference peare0
Outcome
concentrations of sucrose esters in the pulpy tissuee0
Direction
not more thane0
Value
300 ng g −1e0

Verbatim

e0

“concentrations of sucrose esters in the pulpy tissue were not more than 10 ng g −1 for banana, 350 ng g −1 for apple, 300 ng g −1 for Conference pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–853 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose ester concentration in Comice pear pulp was at most 70 ng g −1.

Taxon
Comice peare0
Material
Comice peare0
Outcome
concentrations of sucrose esters in the pulpy tissuee0
Direction
not more thane0
Value
70 ng g −1e0

Verbatim

e0

“concentrations of sucrose esters in the pulpy tissue were not more than 10 ng g −1 for banana, 350 ng g −1 for apple, 300 ng g −1 for Conference pear and 70 ng g −1 for Comice pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–884 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors judged that sucrose ester migration into pulp was unlikely to account for delayed ripening.

Taxon
banana, apple and pear fruitst0
Outcome
retardation of ripeninge0
Qualifier
unlikely to be dependent upon their migration into the pulpy tissuee0

Verbatim

t0

“banana, apple and pear fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“the mode of action of sucrose esters in the retardation of ripening seems unlikely to be dependent upon their migration into the pulpy tissue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1036 · show in text ↑

storage · quality: postharvest · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 20 positive, 2 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

storage · quality: postharvest · MusaPositive and negative results

82 papers: 70 positive, 12 negative or no effect

69 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

storage · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

118 papers: 93 positive, 25 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

114 papers more in this group

See all 118 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.