Paper · 1995 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Root morphology of wheat genotypes differing in zinc efficiency

Bei Dong; Zdenko Rengel; Robin D. Graham

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
131
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The root morphology (root length, diameter) of the three wheat genotypes (Triticum aestivum L. cvs Excalibur and Gatcher, and T. turgidum conv. durum (Desf.) McKay cv Durati) grown in zinc (Zn)‐deficient, sandy soil under controlled conditions has been measured by a root scanner coupled to a computer. Wheat plants were supplied with 0, 0.025, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, or 0.4 mg Zn/kg soil. Excalibur has previously been identified as the Zn‐efficient genotype which can take up more Zn and has higher yield in soils with low plant‐available Zn. Durati is Zn‐inefficient and Gatcher an intermediate genotype with respect to Zn efficiency. Root and shoot dry matter significantly increased at 0.1 mg Zn/kg soil compared to the 0 Zn level. Zinc content in shoots was lower in Durati than in Excalibur and Gatcher at sufficient supply of Zn. Zinc applications had no significant effect on root morphology at two weeks after sowing. At that time, however, the Zn‐efficient genotype Excalibur developed a longer and thinner roots (greater proportion of fine roots with diameter <0.2 mm) than the less efficient Gatcher and Zn‐inefficient Durati. Hence, growing longer and thinner roots and having a greater proportion of thinner roots in the total root biomass early in the growth period may be the two characters associated with the Zn‐efficient genotypes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root and shoot dry matter increased at 0.1 mg Zn/kg soil versus no Zn.

Treatment
0.1 mg Zn/kg soile1
Outcome
Root and shoot dry mattere1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
0 Zn levele1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“three wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–81 · show in text ↑
e1

“Root and shoot dry matter significantly increased at 0.1 mg Zn/kg soil compared to the 0 Zn level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–738 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Durati had lower shoot Zn content than Excalibur and Gatcher under sufficient Zn.

Material
Duratie1
Outcome
Zinc content in shootse1
Direction
lowere1
Comparator
Excalibur and Gatchere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“three wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–81 · show in text ↑
e1

“Zinc content in shoots was lower in Durati than in Excalibur and Gatcher at sufficient supply of Zn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–839 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc applications did not significantly affect root morphology at two weeks.

Treatment
Zinc applicationse1
Outcome
root morphologye1
Direction
no significant effecte1
Qualifier
two weeks after sowinge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“three wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–81 · show in text ↑
e1

“Zinc applications had no significant effect on root morphology at two weeks after sowing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–929 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Excalibur had longer and thinner roots than Gatcher and Durati at two weeks.

Material
Excalibure1
Outcome
rootse1
Direction
longer and thinnere1
Comparator
Gatcher and Zn‐inefficient Duratie1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“three wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–81 · show in text ↑
e1

“Excalibur developed a longer and thinner roots (greater proportion of fine roots with diameter <0.2 mm) than the less efficient Gatcher and Zn‐inefficient Durati.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1141 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors associate early long, thin roots with zinc efficiency.

Organ / stage
rootse1
Outcome
Zn‐efficient genotypese1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“three wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–81 · show in text ↑
e1

“growing longer and thinner roots and having a greater proportion of thinner roots in the total root biomass early in the growth period may be the two characters associated with the Zn‐efficient genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1353 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

200 papers: 155 positive, 45 negative or no effect

154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
    Wheat plants with low Mn or low Zn supply showed no growth differences from controls at the three harvests.

    Distribution and remobilization of Zn and Mn during grain development in wheat · 1994 · compared with controls (sufficient Zn and Mn)

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

196 papers more in this group

See all 200 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.