Paper · 1971 · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry

The fate of magnesium applied to flue-cured tobacco, and its effect on leaf quality and magnesium content

A Pinkerton

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In an outdoor trial with tobacco in sand culture, plants were supplied initially with inadequate magnesium for maximum leaf quality. The effects on quality and magnesium concentration of the cures leaf when magnesium supply was increased were studied.Magnesium passed preferentially to the leaves of poor quality at any leaf position depended on the time and size of the of the increase in nutrient magnesium.The longer the delay in adding magnesium at the optimum rate the greater the number of lower leaves of poor quality. Addition of magnesium at above optimum level improved the quality of the leaf lower on the stalk, but led to an accumulation of magnesium in the top leaf with a consequent reduction in quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Magnesium passed preferentially to the leaves of poor quality, depending on the time and size of the increase in nutrient magnesium.

Compound
Magnesiume0
Outcome
Magnesium passed preferentially to the leaves of poor qualitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“flue-cured tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“Magnesium passed preferentially to the leaves of poor quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–312 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The longer the delay in adding magnesium at the optimum rate, the greater the number of lower leaves of poor quality.

Treatment
delay in adding magnesium at the optimum ratee0
Outcome
number of lower leaves of poor qualitye0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“flue-cured tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“The longer the delay in adding magnesium at the optimum rate the greater the number of lower leaves of poor quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–524 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding magnesium above the optimum level improved the quality of the leaf lower on the stalk.

Treatment
Addition of magnesium at above optimum levele0
Outcome
quality of the leaf lower on the stalke0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“flue-cured tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“Addition of magnesium at above optimum level improved the quality of the leaf lower on the stalk, but led to an accumulation of magnesium in the top leaf with a consequent reduction in quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–718 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding magnesium above the optimum level led to an accumulation of magnesium in the top leaf.

Treatment
Addition of magnesium at above optimum levele0
Outcome
magnesium in the top leafe0
Direction
accumulatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“flue-cured tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“Addition of magnesium at above optimum level improved the quality of the leaf lower on the stalk, but led to an accumulation of magnesium in the top leaf with a consequent reduction in quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–718 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding magnesium above the optimum level led to a consequent reduction in quality of the top leaf.

Treatment
Addition of magnesium at above optimum levele0
Outcome
qualitye0
Direction
reductione0
Qualifier
top leafe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“flue-cured tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“Addition of magnesium at above optimum level improved the quality of the leaf lower on the stalk, but led to an accumulation of magnesium in the top leaf with a consequent reduction in quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–718 · show in text ↑

magnesium atom · quality: general · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

magnesium atom · nutrient: content · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.