Abstract
Exposure of mung bean (Vigna radiata [L.] Wilczek cv Jumbo) cuttings to low level red light inhibits dark-induced leaf abscission. A 12-hour daily light requirement for maximum inhibition of abscission was equally effective as a continuous red light treatment or shorter light-dark cycles. Transfer of cuttings from dark to light stopped the abscission process at the time of transfer. The available evidence suggests a light receptor located in the leaves with an abscission inhibitor translocated from lighted leaf to the abscission zone.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Low level red light inhibits dark-induced leaf abscission.
- Taxon
- mung bean
.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiatae0 - Material
- Jumboe0
- Treatment
- low level red lighte0
- Outcome
- leaf abscissione0
- Direction
- inhibitse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Exposure of mung bean (Vigna radiata [L.] Wilczek cv Jumbo) cuttings to low level red light inhibits dark-induced leaf abscission”
Claim · model-written summary
Twelve hours of daily red light produced maximum inhibition comparable with continuous red light or shorter cycles.
- Taxon
- mung beanVigna radiatae1
- Treatment
- 12-hour daily lighte0
- Outcome
- inhibition of abscissione0
- Direction
- equally effectivee0
- Comparator
- continuous red light treatment or shorter light-dark cyclese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A 12-hour daily light requirement for maximum inhibition of abscission was equally effective as a continuous red light treatment or shorter light-dark cycles”
t0“Abscission”
e1“Exposure of mung bean (Vigna radiata [L.] Wilczek cv Jumbo) cuttings to low level red light inhibits dark-induced leaf abscission”
Claim · model-written summary
Moving cuttings from darkness into light stopped abscission at transfer.
- Taxon
- mung beanVigna radiatae1
- Treatment
- Transfer of cuttings from dark to lighte0
- Outcome
- abscission processe0
- Direction
- stoppede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Transfer of cuttings from dark to light stopped the abscission process at the time of transfer”
t0“Abscission”
e1“Exposure of mung bean (Vigna radiata [L.] Wilczek cv Jumbo) cuttings to low level red light inhibits dark-induced leaf abscission”
Claim · model-written summary
Evidence suggested a leaf light receptor and a translocated abscission inhibitor.
- Taxon
- mung beanVigna radiatae1
- Outcome
- abscission inhibitor translocated from lighted leaf to the abscission zonee0
- Qualifier
- light receptor located in the leavese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The available evidence suggests a light receptor located in the leaves with an abscission inhibitor translocated from lighted leaf to the abscission zone”
t0“Abscission”
e1“Exposure of mung bean (Vigna radiata [L.] Wilczek cv Jumbo) cuttings to low level red light inhibits dark-induced leaf abscission”
The same questions in other papers
light · disease · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →light · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.