Paper · 2012 · Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science

Potato (Solanum tuberosumL.) yield response to simulated hail damage

Amir Hooshang Jalali

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Yield loss in potato damaged by hail is mainly caused by reduced leaf area and plant stand. A 2-year field experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of simulated hail damage on potato yield. The treatments were six levels of defoliation (control, 20, 40, 60, 80 and 100%) and five defoliation times (2, 5, 8, 11 and 14 weeks after emergence). The experiment was set up in a randomized block design with four replications, and the treatments were arranged as a factorial. From the perspective of yield loss, the most important time of defoliation, for mild and intense defoliation, respectively, were 8–11 and 5–11 weeks after emergence. The period between 5 and 8 weeks includes the stages of tuber initiation and tuber growth; the stages most sensitive to removal of aerial parts. Regardless of defoliation intensity, the production of small potatoes mostly occurred when defoliation occurred at 2 and 5 weeks. Plants were able to recover from any level of defoliation if it occurred at an early stage. In summary, yield reduction was little influenced by intensity of defoliation, but the timing of defoliation was evidently the most important factor. Keywords: damagedefoliationshootstuber formationyield Acknowledgements The author wishes to thank the Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center, Isfahan, Islamic Republic of Iran for financial support.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For intense defoliation, the most important time of defoliation for potato yield loss was 5-11 weeks after emergence.

Treatment
intense defoliatione0
Outcome
yield losse0
Direction
most importante0
Value
5–11e0
Qualifier
weeks after emergencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
e0

“From the perspective of yield loss, the most important time of defoliation, for mild and intense defoliation, respectively, were 8–11 and 5–11 weeks after emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–653 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The period between 5 and 8 weeks after emergence, including tuber initiation and tuber growth, was the stage most sensitive to removal of aerial parts.

Organ / stage
tuber initiation and tuber growthe0
Outcome
stages most sensitive to removal of aerial partse0
Qualifier
The period between 5 and 8 weekse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
e0

“The period between 5 and 8 weeks includes the stages of tuber initiation and tuber growth; the stages most sensitive to removal of aerial parts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–798 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regardless of defoliation intensity, production of small potatoes mostly occurred when defoliation occurred at 2 and 5 weeks.

Treatment
defoliation occurred at 2 and 5 weekse0
Outcome
production of small potatoese0
Direction
increaseinferrede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
e0

“Regardless of defoliation intensity, the production of small potatoes mostly occurred when defoliation occurred at 2 and 5 weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–928 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potato plants were able to recover from any level of defoliation if it occurred at an early stage.

Outcome
recover from any level of defoliatione0
Qualifier
if it occurred at an early stagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
e0

“Plants were able to recover from any level of defoliation if it occurred at an early stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1020 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potato yield reduction was little influenced by the intensity of defoliation.

Treatment
intensity of defoliatione0
Outcome
yield reductione0
Direction
little influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
e0

“yield reduction was little influenced by intensity of defoliation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1099 · show in text ↑

pruning · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

16 papers: 8 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.