Paper · 1975 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

Effect of temperature and scarification on germination and emergence of wild safflower, Carthamus oxyacantha Bieb.

A. Bassiri; I. Rouhani; S. R. Ghorashy

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY Seeds of wild safflower, Carthamus oxyacantha Bieb., collected from the Bajgah area, Iran, were subjected to chilling and/or scarification and their germination and emergence characteristics and seedling growth were studied in two laboratory experiments. Seeds of Arak 2811 variety of cultivated safflower, C. tinctorius L., harvested from the same area at the same time was used for comparison. In the first experiment, the untreated, scarified, chilled at 0 °C for 1 month, and chilled and scarified wild seed and seed of the variety Arak 2811 were incubated at six different temperatures (5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 °C) and their germination percentage and seedling lengths were recorded. In the second experiment, the seeds of the above five treatments were planted in a silty clay loam at room temperature (23 ± 2 °C) and their emergence and seedling heights were noted. In all cases, the cultivated variety, Arak 2811, had higher germination and emergence percentages and seedling heights than the wild type. Germination of both strains was greatly reduced at the two extreme temperatures (5 and 30 °C). The optimum temperatures for germination of the wild and the cultivated strains were between 15 and 20 °C. Scarification of the wild seed did not improve the germination or emergence percentages and chilling of the seed for a month at 0 °C reduced the emergence of the wild seed. Temperature of germination, however, seemed to be an important factor affecting germination and seedling growth of wild safflower.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cultivated variety Arak 2811 had higher germination and emergence percentages and seedling heights than the wild type.

Material
Arak 2811e1
Organ / stage
seedlinge1
Outcome
germination and emergence percentages and seedling heightse1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
wild typee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wild safflower, Carthamus oxyacantha Bieb.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–114 · show in text ↑
e1

“In all cases, the cultivated variety, Arak 2811, had higher germination and emergence percentages and seedling heights than the wild type”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–1019 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination of both strains was greatly reduced at the two extreme temperatures (5 and 30 °C).

Treatment
two extreme temperatures (5 and 30 °C)e2
Outcome
Germinatione2
Direction
reducede2
Qualifier
greatlye2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wild safflower, Carthamus oxyacantha Bieb.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–114 · show in text ↑
e2

“Germination of both strains was greatly reduced at the two extreme temperatures (5 and 30 °C)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1114 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimum temperatures for germination of the wild and cultivated strains were between 15 and 20 °C.

Material
wild and the cultivated strainse3
Outcome
optimum temperatures for germinatione3
Value
between 15 and 20 °Ce3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wild safflower, Carthamus oxyacantha Bieb.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–114 · show in text ↑
e3

“The optimum temperatures for germination of the wild and the cultivated strains were between 15 and 20 °C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1221 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Scarification of the wild seed did not improve germination or emergence percentages compared with untreated seed.

Treatment
Scarification of the wild seede4
Outcome
germination or emergence percentagese4
Direction
did not improvee4
Comparator
untreatede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wild safflower, Carthamus oxyacantha Bieb.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–114 · show in text ↑
e4

“Scarification of the wild seed did not improve the germination or emergence percentages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1223–1310 · show in text ↑
e5

“the untreated, scarified, chilled at 0 °C for 1 month”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–482 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilling of the seed for a month at 0 °C reduced the emergence of the wild seed compared with untreated seed.

Material
wild seede6
Treatment
chilling of the seed for a month at 0 °Ce6
Outcome
emergencee6
Direction
reducede6
Comparator
untreatede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wild safflower, Carthamus oxyacantha Bieb.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–114 · show in text ↑
e5

“the untreated, scarified, chilled at 0 °C for 1 month”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–482 · show in text ↑
e6

“chilling of the seed for a month at 0 °C reduced the emergence of the wild seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1315–1394 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Temperature of germination seems to be an important factor affecting germination and seedling growth of wild safflower.

Treatment
Temperature of germinatione7
Outcome
germination and seedling growthe7

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carthamus tinctorius
Carthamus tinctorius · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wild safflower, Carthamus oxyacantha Bieb.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–114 · show in text ↑
e7

“Temperature of germination, however, seemed to be an important factor affecting germination and seedling growth of wild safflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1396–1525 · show in text ↑

cold · growth · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

seed treatment · growth · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 20 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.