Paper · 2001 · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY

In Vivo Observation of Cavitation and Embolism Repair Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging,

N. Michele Holbrook; Eric T. Ahrens; Michael J. Burns; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
275
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to noninvasively monitor the status of individual xylem vessels in the stem of an intact, transpiring grape (Vitis vinifera) plant over a period of approximately 40 h. Proton density-weighted MRI was used to visualize the distribution of mobile water in the stem and individual xylem vessels were scored as either water or gas filled (i.e. embolized). The number of water-filled vessels decreased during the first 24 h of the experiment, indicating that approximately 10 vessels had cavitated during this time. Leaf water potentials decreased from -1.25 to -2.1 MPa during the same period. Watering increased leaf water potentials to -0.25 MPa and prevented any further cavitation. Refilling of xylem vessels occurred as soon as the lights were switched off, with the majority of vessels becoming refilled with water during the first 2 to 3 h in darkness. These measurements demonstrate that MRI can be used to monitor the functional status of individual xylem vessels, providing the first method to study the process of cavitation and embolism repair in intact plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The number of water-filled vessels decreased during the first 24 h of the experiment.

Taxon
grapee0
Outcome
number of water-filled vesselse1
Direction
decreasede1

Verbatim

e0

“grape (Vitis vinifera) plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–172 · show in text ↑
e1

“The number of water-filled vessels decreased during the first 24 h of the experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–478 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

approximately 10 vessels had cavitated during this time.

Taxon
grapee0
Outcome
vessels had cavitatede1
Value
approximately 10 vesselse1

Verbatim

e0

“grape (Vitis vinifera) plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–172 · show in text ↑
e1

“approximately 10 vessels had cavitated during this time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–551 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf water potentials decreased from -1.25 to -2.1 MPa during the same period.

Taxon
grapee0
Outcome
Leaf water potentialse1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
-1.25 to -2.1 MPae1

Verbatim

e0

“grape (Vitis vinifera) plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–172 · show in text ↑
e1

“Leaf water potentials decreased from -1.25 to -2.1 MPa during the same period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–630 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Watering increased leaf water potentials to -0.25 MPa.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
Wateringe1
Outcome
leaf water potentialse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
-0.25 MPae1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“grape (Vitis vinifera) plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–172 · show in text ↑
e1

“Watering increased leaf water potentials to -0.25 MPa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–685 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Watering increased leaf water potentials to -0.25 MPa and prevented any further cavitation.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
Wateringe1
Outcome
further cavitatione1
Direction
preventede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“grape (Vitis vinifera) plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–172 · show in text ↑
e1

“Watering increased leaf water potentials to -0.25 MPa and prevented any further cavitation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–722 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Refilling of xylem vessels occurred as soon as the lights were switched off.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
lights were switched offe1
Outcome
Refilling of xylem vesselse1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“grape (Vitis vinifera) plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–172 · show in text ↑
e1

“Refilling of xylem vessels occurred as soon as the lights were switched off”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–799 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

the majority of vessels becoming refilled with water during the first 2 to 3 h in darkness.

Taxon
grapee0
Outcome
vessels becoming refilled with watere1
Value
first 2 to 3 he1

Verbatim

e0

“grape (Vitis vinifera) plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–172 · show in text ↑
e1

“the majority of vessels becoming refilled with water during the first 2 to 3 h in darkness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–896 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MRI monitored functional status of individual xylem vessels in intact grape.

Taxon
grapee0
Outcome
functional status of individual xylem vesselse1
Value
individual xylem vesselse1

Verbatim

e0

“grape (Vitis vinifera) plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–172 · show in text ↑
e1

“MRI can be used to monitor the functional status of individual xylem vessels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1010 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: water · VitisPositive and negative results

47 papers: 40 positive, 7 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.