Paper · 2004 · Physiologia Plantarum

Measurement of intracellular pH in maize root tissue with α‐methyl fluorinated alanines and in‐vivo 19F NMR spectroscopy

Philip E. Pfeffer; Yair Shachar‐Hill; Shu‐I. Tu; et al.

11
claims
17
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Methods for the simultaneous measurement of vacuolar and cytoplasmic pH in plant tissues currently have significant limitations. This study demonstrates the usefulness of methyl difluoro alanine (F 2 ALA) and methyl trifluoro alanine (F 3 ALA) with in‐vivo 19 F NMR spectroscopy to measure vacuolar and cytoplasmic pH in maize root tissue. The pH dependence of the chemical shift of F 2 ALA and F 3 ALA is greater than either the commonly used 31 P NMR signal of inorganic phosphate or the 13 C NMR signals of trans‐aconitic acid, which is also found in some plant cells. F 2 ALA and F 3 ALA were also able to detect changes over a greater range of pH. When maize root tissue was incubated in the presence of 0.35 m m F 2 ALA or F 3 ALA, these accumulated to significant concentrations in two compartments of different pH with no significant effect on growth rate of root tips. The time course of accumulation and the pH of the two compartments were consistent with one being the cytoplasm and the other the vacuole. The chemical shift of both C 2 of trans‐aconitic acid and vacuolar F 3 ALA indicated that the mean vacuolar pH of maize root cells was 4.6 and that the pH gradient across the tonoplast membrane was about 2.8 units. Under a variety of conditions, there was considerable heterogeneity in the pH of the vacuoles in maize root tissue as indicated by the peak width of the signal from F 3 ALA. The significance of these values is discussed in terms of the bioenergetics of proton transport across the tonoplast membrane in vivo.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F 2 ALA had greater pH dependence of chemical shift than comparison NMR signals.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
pH dependence of the chemical shift of F 2 ALAe0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
31 P NMR signal of inorganic phosphatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pH dependence of the chemical shift of F 2 ALA and F 3 ALA is greater than either the commonly used 31 P NMR signal of inorganic phosphate or the 13 C NMR signals of trans‐aconitic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–529 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F 3 ALA had greater pH dependence of chemical shift than comparison NMR signals.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
pH dependence of the chemical shift of F 2 ALA and F 3 ALAe0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
13 C NMR signals of trans‐aconitic acide0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The pH dependence of the chemical shift of F 2 ALA and F 3 ALA is greater than either the commonly used 31 P NMR signal of inorganic phosphate or the 13 C NMR signals of trans‐aconitic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–529 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F 2 ALA detected changes over a greater pH range.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
detect changes over a greater range of pHe0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“F 2 ALA and F 3 ALA were also able to detect changes over a greater range of pH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–651 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F 3 ALA detected changes over a greater pH range.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
detect changes over a greater range of pHe0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“F 2 ALA and F 3 ALA were also able to detect changes over a greater range of pH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–651 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

F 2 ALA accumulated in two maize root compartments at different pH.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Organ / stage
root tissuee0
Treatment
0.35 m m F 2 ALAe0
Outcome
accumulated to significant concentrations in two compartments of different pHe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When maize root tissue was incubated in the presence of 0.35 m m F 2 ALA or F 3 ALA, these accumulated to significant concentrations in two compartments of different pH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–821 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

F 3 ALA accumulated in two maize root compartments at different pH.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Organ / stage
root tissuee0
Treatment
F 3 ALAe0
Outcome
accumulated to significant concentrations in two compartments of different pHe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When maize root tissue was incubated in the presence of 0.35 m m F 2 ALA or F 3 ALA, these accumulated to significant concentrations in two compartments of different pH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–821 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The probes had no significant effect on maize root-tip growth rate.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
0.35 m m F 2 ALA or F 3 ALAe0
Outcome
growth rate of root tipse0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When maize root tissue was incubated in the presence of 0.35 m m F 2 ALA or F 3 ALA, these accumulated to significant concentrations in two compartments of different pH with no significant effect on growth rate of root tips”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–876 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two measured compartments were consistent with cytoplasm and vacuole.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
one being the cytoplasm and the other the vacuolee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The time course of accumulation and the pH of the two compartments were consistent with one being the cytoplasm and the other the vacuole”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–1015 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean vacuolar pH of maize root cells was 4.6.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Organ / stage
root cellse0
Outcome
mean vacuolar pHe0
Value
4.6e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the mean vacuolar pH of maize root cells was 4.6”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1155 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The pH gradient across the tonoplast was about 2.8 units.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
pH gradient across the tonoplast membranee0
Value
about 2.8 unitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the pH gradient across the tonoplast membrane was about 2.8 units”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1230 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize root vacuolar pH was heterogeneous under various conditions.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Organ / stage
root tissuee0
Outcome
heterogeneity in the pH of the vacuolese0
Qualifier
Under a variety of conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under a variety of conditions, there was considerable heterogeneity in the pH of the vacuoles in maize root tissue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1346 · show in text ↑

5-aminolevulinic acid · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.