Paper · 2012 · International Journal of Agriculture Sciences

SUGAR BEET PRODUCTIVITY AS AFFECTED BY FOLIAR SPRAYING WITH METHANOL AND BORON

ABIDO W AE

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
28
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Two field experiments were carried out at Kafr El-Garayda Village, Bialla Center, Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypt during 2010/2011 and 2011/2012 seasons to study the effect of methanol and boron foliar spraying on growth, yield and quality of sugar beet. This aimed to study four aqueous methanol solutions control without 0, 15, 30 and 45% (v/v) sprayed three times during growth stages which occupied the vertical plots and four boron concentrations control without 0, 40, 80 and 120 ppm as boric acid applied as foliar spray- ing at two times during growth season and assigned in the horizontal plots. Results indicated that foliar application of 30% methanol solution significantly increased all studied characters i.e. total chlorophyll, leaf area/plant, foliage and root fresh weight, foliage and root length and root diameter, total soluble solids, sucrose and apparent purity per- centages, root, top and sugar yields/ha, whereas harvest index was decreased. Moreover, increasing methanol concentration to 45% tend- ed to decrease all above mentioned characters. Application of 80 ppm boron significantly improved root yield and its attributes and root quality, on contrarily harvest index was decreased. Maximum top, root, sugar yields/ha and root quality produced by foliar spraying of 30% methanol and 80 ppm boron.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 30% methanol significantly increased total chlorophyll.

Treatment
30% methanol solutione0
Outcome
total chlorophylle0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of 30% methanol solution significantly increased all studied characters i.e. total chlorophyll”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–743 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 30% methanol significantly increased leaf area and foliage and root size traits.

Treatment
30% methanol solutione0
Outcome
leaf area/plant, foliage and root fresh weight, foliage and root length and root diametere0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of 30% methanol solution significantly increased all studied characters i.e. total chlorophyll, leaf area/plant, foliage and root fresh weight, foliage and root length and root diameter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–834 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 30% methanol significantly increased soluble solids, sucrose and apparent purity.

Treatment
30% methanol solutione0
Outcome
total soluble solids, sucrose and apparent purity per- centagese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of 30% methanol solution significantly increased all studied characters i.e. total chlorophyll, leaf area/plant, foliage and root fresh weight, foliage and root length and root diameter, total soluble solids, sucrose and apparent purity per- centages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–899 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 30% methanol significantly increased root, top and sugar yields.

Treatment
30% methanol solutione0
Outcome
root, top and sugar yields/hae0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of 30% methanol solution significantly increased all studied characters i.e. total chlorophyll, leaf area/plant, foliage and root fresh weight, foliage and root length and root diameter, total soluble solids, sucrose and apparent purity per- centages, root, top and sugar yields/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–930 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 30% methanol decreased harvest index.

Treatment
30% methanol solutione0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of 30% methanol solution significantly increased all studied characters i.e. total chlorophyll, leaf area/plant, foliage and root fresh weight, foliage and root length and root diameter, total soluble solids, sucrose and apparent purity per- centages, root, top and sugar yields/ha, whereas harvest index was decreased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–968 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing methanol concentration to 45% tended to decrease the previously listed traits.

Treatment
45%e0
Outcome
all above mentioned characterse0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing methanol concentration to 45% tend- ed to decrease all above mentioned characters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1072 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 80 ppm boron significantly improved root yield and attributes.

Treatment
80 ppm borone0
Outcome
root yield and its attributese0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 80 ppm boron significantly improved root yield and its attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1153 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 80 ppm boron significantly improved root quality.

Treatment
80 ppm borone0
Outcome
root qualitye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 80 ppm boron significantly improved root yield and its attributes and root quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1170 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 80 ppm boron decreased harvest index.

Treatment
80 ppm borone0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 80 ppm boron significantly improved root yield and its attributes and root quality, on contrarily harvest index was decreased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1214 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 30% methanol with 80 ppm boron produced maximum top, root and sugar yields.

Treatment
30% methanol and 80 ppm borone0
Outcome
top, root, sugar yields/hae0
Direction
Maximume0

Not reportedComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum top, root, sugar yields/ha and root quality produced by foliar spraying of 30% methanol and 80 ppm boron.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1328 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 30% methanol with 80 ppm boron produced maximum root quality.

Treatment
30% methanol and 80 ppm borone0
Outcome
root qualitye0
Direction
Maximume0

Not reportedComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum top, root, sugar yields/ha and root quality produced by foliar spraying of 30% methanol and 80 ppm boron.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1328 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑

boron atom · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

35 papers: 30 positive, 5 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

boron atom · quality: general · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

methanol · physiology: pigments · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

methanol · quality: general · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

methanol · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

methanol · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

methanol · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.