Paper · 2006 · Acta Agronomica Hungarica

Influence of volunteer durum wheat ( Triticum durum ) cultivars and density on lentils ( Lens culinaris )

H. Z. Ghosheh; H. Z. Ghosheh; M. K. El-Shatnawi; et al.

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Greenhouse experiments were conducted for two consecutive seasons to investigate the influence of volunteer durum wheat cultivars and density on lentil growth and yield. It is speculated that interference may be severe whenever wheat and lentils are rotated in semi-arid regions. Lentil:durum wheat ratios of 1:0, 1:1, 1:2, 1:4 and 1:6 were evaluated utilizing two durum wheat cultivars, Hourani and ACSAD 65. The results indicated that wheat interference did not influence lentil growth for the first 80 days after crop emergence, but afterwards, the lentil height, straw and seed yield were affected by the presence of wheat. A 50% reduction in either lentil straw or seed yield was estimated from the interference of a single plant per pot. The semi-tall cultivar Hourani had more adverse effects on lentil growth and yield than the semi-dwarf cultivar ACSAD 65.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat did not influence lentil growth during the first 80 days.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
wheat interferencee0
Interactor
wheatTriticum aestivume0weed
Outcome
lentil growthe0
Direction
did not influencee0
Value
80 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat interference did not influence lentil growth for the first 80 days after crop emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–530 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 80 days, wheat presence affected lentil height, straw yield and seed yield.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
presence of wheate0
Interactor
wheatTriticum aestivume0weed
Outcome
lentil height, straw and seed yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“afterwards, the lentil height, straw and seed yield were affected by the presence of wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–627 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One wheat plant per pot was estimated to reduce lentil straw yield by 50%.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
interference of a single plant per pote0
Interactor
wheatTriticum aestivume1weed
Outcome
lentil strawe0
Direction
reductione0
Value
50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A 50% reduction in either lentil straw or seed yield was estimated from the interference of a single plant per pot.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–743 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat interference did not influence lentil growth for the first 80 days after crop emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–530 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One wheat plant per pot was estimated to reduce lentil seed yield by 50%.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
interference of a single plant per pote0
Interactor
wheatTriticum aestivume1weed
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Value
50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A 50% reduction in either lentil straw or seed yield was estimated from the interference of a single plant per pot.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–743 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat interference did not influence lentil growth for the first 80 days after crop emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–530 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hourani wheat adversely affected lentil growth and yield more than ACSAD 65.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise0
Treatment
Houranie0
Interactor
wheatTriticum aestivume1weed
Outcome
lentil growth and yielde0
Direction
more adversee0
Comparator
ACSAD 65e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The semi-tall cultivar Hourani had more adverse effects on lentil growth and yield than the semi-dwarf cultivar ACSAD 65.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–865 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat interference did not influence lentil growth for the first 80 days after crop emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–530 · show in text ↑

Triticum aestivum · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.