Paper · 2005 · Experimental Agriculture

CROP PRODUCTIVITY AND SOIL FERTILITY IN A TROPICAL DRYLAND AGRO-ECOSYSTEM: IMPACT OF RESIDUE AND TILLAGE MANAGEMENT

C. P. KUSHWAHA; K. P. SINGH

14
claims
23
verbatim quotes
32
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

To understand the impact of residue and tillage management on crop productivity of rice and barley (including grain yield) and soil fertility in a tropical dryland agro-ecosystem, the following six treatments were established: (a) conventional tillage and residue removed (CT−R); (b) conventional tillage and residue retained (CT+R); (c) minimum tillage and residue removed (MT−R); (d) minimum tillage and residue retained (MT+R); (e) zero tillage and residue removed (ZT−R); and (f) zero tillage and residue retained (ZT+R). Minimum total net productivity (TNP) in both barley (the winter season crop) and rice (the rainy season crop) was recorded in the ZT−R treatment and the maximum in the MT+R treatment. In these crops, 83–88% of TNP was represented by above-ground net productivity (ANP). A reduction in tillage, from conventional to zero, especially when combined with residue retention, reduced the crop TNP/weed TNP ratio, reflecting the abundance of weeds with zero tillage. In both crops, minimum tillage increased grain yields, compared with conventional, but zero tillage resulted in reduced yields. Soil microbial biomass carbon (MBC) and nitrogen (MBN) and N-mineralization rates were higher in rice than in barley, and were maximum in the MT+R treatment. Crop productivity and grain yield in different treatments were positively correlated with MBC, MBN, N-mineralization rate and available-N. Strong negative correlations between crop productivity and grain yield with weed TNP and N-uptake were recorded. This study suggests that retention of a small fraction (one-third) of above-ground biomass from the previous crop and its incorporation in the soil through minimum tillage enhances the crop productivity and grain yield of succeeding crops and promotes soil fertility in a cereal based tropical dryland agro-ecosystem.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

barley total net productivity was lowest under ZT−R and highest under MT+R.

Treatment
ZT−R treatmente0
Outcome
total net productivity (TNP)e0
Direction
Minimume0
Qualifier
maximume0
Comparator
MT+R treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Minimum total net productivity (TNP) in both barley (the winter season crop) and rice (the rainy season crop) was recorded in the ZT−R treatment and the maximum in the MT+R treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–709 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

rice total net productivity was lowest under ZT−R and highest under MT+R.

Treatment
ZT−R treatmente0
Outcome
total net productivity (TNP)e0
Direction
Minimume0
Qualifier
maximume0
Comparator
MT+R treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Minimum total net productivity (TNP) in both barley (the winter season crop) and rice (the rainy season crop) was recorded in the ZT−R treatment and the maximum in the MT+R treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–709 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Above-ground net productivity accounted for 83–88% of total net productivity in barley.

Outcome
above-ground net productivity (ANP)e0
Value
83–88%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In these crops, 83–88% of TNP was represented by above-ground net productivity (ANP).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–795 · show in text ↑
e1

“barley (the winter season crop) and rice (the rainy season crop)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–635 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Above-ground net productivity accounted for 83–88% of total net productivity in rice.

Outcome
above-ground net productivity (ANP)e0
Value
83–88%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In these crops, 83–88% of TNP was represented by above-ground net productivity (ANP).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–795 · show in text ↑
e1

“barley (the winter season crop) and rice (the rainy season crop)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–635 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing tillage from conventional to zero, especially with residue retention, reduced the crop to weed productivity ratio.

Treatment
zeroe0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
crop TNP/weed TNP ratioe0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
conventionale0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“A reduction in tillage, from conventional to zero, especially when combined with residue retention, reduced the crop TNP/weed TNP ratio, reflecting the abundance of weeds with zero tillage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–985 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

barley grain yield increased with minimum tillage relative to conventional tillage.

Treatment
minimum tillagee0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
conventionale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In both crops, minimum tillage increased grain yields, compared with conventional, but zero tillage resulted in reduced yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1113 · show in text ↑
e1

“barley (the winter season crop) and rice (the rainy season crop)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–635 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

barley grain yield reduced with zero tillage relative to conventional tillage.

Treatment
zero tillagee0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
conventionale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In both crops, minimum tillage increased grain yields, compared with conventional, but zero tillage resulted in reduced yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1113 · show in text ↑
e1

“barley (the winter season crop) and rice (the rainy season crop)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–635 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

rice grain yield increased with minimum tillage relative to conventional tillage.

Treatment
minimum tillagee0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
conventionale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In both crops, minimum tillage increased grain yields, compared with conventional, but zero tillage resulted in reduced yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1113 · show in text ↑
e1

“barley (the winter season crop) and rice (the rainy season crop)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–635 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

rice grain yield reduced with zero tillage relative to conventional tillage.

Treatment
zero tillagee0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
conventionale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In both crops, minimum tillage increased grain yields, compared with conventional, but zero tillage resulted in reduced yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1113 · show in text ↑
e1

“barley (the winter season crop) and rice (the rainy season crop)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–635 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen, and N-mineralization were higher for rice than barley and peaked under MT+R.

Treatment
MT+R treatmente0
Outcome
Soil microbial biomass carbon (MBC) and nitrogen (MBN) and N-mineralization ratese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
barleye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil microbial biomass carbon (MBC) and nitrogen (MBN) and N-mineralization rates were higher in rice than in barley, and were maximum in the MT+R treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1271 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen, and N-mineralization were higher for rice than barley and peaked under MT+R.

Treatment
MT+R treatmente0
Outcome
Soil microbial biomass carbon (MBC) and nitrogen (MBN) and N-mineralization ratese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
ricee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil microbial biomass carbon (MBC) and nitrogen (MBN) and N-mineralization rates were higher in rice than in barley, and were maximum in the MT+R treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1271 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop productivity and grain yield were positively correlated with soil microbial biomass and nitrogen availability.

Treatment
different treatmentse0
Outcome
Crop productivity and grain yielde0
Direction
positively correlatede0
Qualifier
MBC, MBN, N-mineralization rate and available-Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Crop productivity and grain yield in different treatments were positively correlated with MBC, MBN, N-mineralization rate and available-N.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1410 · show in text ↑
e1

“crop productivity of rice and barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 62–98 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop productivity and grain yield were negatively correlated with weed productivity and nitrogen uptake.

Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
crop productivity and grain yielde0
Direction
negative correlationse0
Qualifier
weed TNP and N-uptakee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Strong negative correlations between crop productivity and grain yield with weed TNP and N-uptake were recorded.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1411–1523 · show in text ↑
e1

“crop productivity of rice and barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 62–98 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend retaining one-third of prior crop biomass and incorporating it by minimum tillage to improve succeeding crop productivity, grain yield, and soil fertility.

Outcome
retention of a small fraction (one-third) of above-ground biomass from the previous crop and its incorporation in the soil through minimum tillagee0
Value
one-thirde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This study suggests that retention of a small fraction (one-third) of above-ground biomass from the previous crop and its incorporation in the soil through minimum tillage enhances the crop productivity and grain yield of succeeding crops and promotes soil fertility in a cereal based tropical dryland agro-ecosystem.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1524–1841 · show in text ↑
e1

“crop productivity of rice and barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 62–98 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

161 papers: 105 positive, 56 negative or no effect

104 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 13 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

157 papers more in this group

See all 161 papers →

tillage · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

729 papers: 587 positive, 142 negative or no effect

586 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 27 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

725 papers more in this group

See all 729 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.