Paper · 2012 · Annals of Botany

Aluminium tolerance in rice is antagonistic with nitrate preference and synergistic with ammonium preference

Xue Qiang Zhao; Shi Wei Guo; Fumie Shinmachi; et al.

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
45
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Acidic soils are dominated chemically by more ammonium and more available, so more potentially toxic, aluminium compared with neutral to calcareous soils, which are characterized by more nitrate and less available, so less toxic, aluminium. However, it is not known whether aluminium tolerance and nitrogen source preference are linked in plants. METHODS: This question was investigated by comparing the responses of 30 rice (Oryza sativa) varieties (15 subsp. japonica cultivars and 15 subsp. indica cultivars) to aluminium, various ammonium/nitrate ratios and their combinations under acidic solution conditions. KEY RESULTS: indica rice plants were generally found to be aluminium-sensitive and nitrate-preferring, while japonica cultivars were aluminium-tolerant and relatively ammonium-preferring. Aluminium tolerance of different rice varieties was significantly negatively correlated with their nitrate preference. Furthermore, aluminium enhanced ammonium-fed rice growth but inhibited nitrate-fed rice growth. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that aluminium tolerance in rice is antagonistic with nitrate preference and synergistic with ammonium preference under acidic solution conditions. A schematic diagram summarizing the interactions of aluminium and nitrogen in soil-plant ecosystems is presented and provides a new basis for the integrated management of acidic soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indica rice was generally aluminium-sensitive and nitrate-preferring.

Material
indicae0
Outcome
aluminium-sensitive and nitrate-preferringe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“indica rice plants were generally found to be aluminium-sensitive and nitrate-preferring”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–737 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Japonica rice cultivars were aluminium-tolerant and relatively ammonium-preferring.

Material
japonicae0
Outcome
aluminium-tolerant and relatively ammonium-preferringe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“japonica cultivars were aluminium-tolerant and relatively ammonium-preferring”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–822 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice (Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–460 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aluminium tolerance was significantly negatively correlated with nitrate preference among rice varieties.

Material
different rice varietiese0
Outcome
Aluminium tolerancee0
Direction
negatively correlatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Aluminium tolerance of different rice varieties was significantly negatively correlated with their nitrate preference”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–941 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aluminium enhanced ammonium-fed rice growth.

Treatment
aluminiume0
Outcome
rice growthe0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
ammonium-fede0
Setting
acidic solution conditionse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“aluminium enhanced ammonium-fed rice growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–999 · show in text ↑
e1

“various ammonium/nitrate ratios and their combinations under acidic solution conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–634 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aluminium inhibited nitrate-fed rice growth.

Treatment
aluminiume0
Outcome
rice growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0
Qualifier
nitrate-fede0
Setting
acidic solution conditionse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“aluminium enhanced ammonium-fed rice growth but inhibited nitrate-fed rice growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1037 · show in text ↑
e1

“their combinations under acidic solution conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–634 · show in text ↑

aluminium atom · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

53 papers: 16 positive, 37 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.