Paper · 1999 · Plant and Cell Physiology

Autolysis Promotes the Extension Capacity of Zea mays Coleoptile Cell Walls in Response to Acid pH Solutions

M. J. Pena; I. Zarra; G. Revilla

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
4
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The relationship between autolytic degradation of β(1–3),(1–4)-D-glucan and acid pH-induced extension of isolated Zea mays cell walls has been investigated using a constant-load extension technique. Acidic buffer (4.5) was able to induce an additional extension (Ea) on cell walls already extended at pH 6.8 buffer under a 20 g-mass load, indicating that the additional extension (Ea) was the parameter that better represented the effect of the different treatments on the mechanical properties of maize coleoptile cell walls. The additional extension in response to acidic pH was higher when cell walls had been previously autolysed for 24 h at pH 5.5. Furthermore, the acid-pH effect was dependent on the presence during the constant load extension of some thermo-labile factors, suggesting the participation of expansins. Acid pH increased Ea of native cell walls through an increase in the plastic extension (Ep) in agreement with a one step mechanism leading directly to irreversible (plastic) wall extension as suggested by Cosgrove (1977). The autolytic degradation of β(1–3), (1–4)-D-glucan was also able to modify the mechanical properties of maize coleoptile cell walls increasing its elastic extension (Ee) in response to pH 4.5 buffer but that modification only leads to an increase in wall extension when expansins are active, suggesting a cooperation between β-glucan turnover and expansin action.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acidic buffer at pH 4.5 induced an additional extension of cell walls already extended at pH 6.8 under a 20 g-mass load.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayst0
Treatment
Acidic buffer (4.5)e1
Outcome
additional extension (Ea)e1
Direction
inducee1
Qualifier
20 g-mass loade1
Comparator
pH 6.8 buffere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Zea mays Coleoptile Cell Walls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“Acidic buffer (4.5) was able to induce an additional extension (Ea) on cell walls already extended at pH 6.8 buffer under a 20 g-mass load”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–337 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The additional extension in response to acidic pH was higher when cell walls had been autolysed for 24 h at pH 5.5.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayst0
Treatment
autolysed for 24 h at pH 5.5e2
Outcome
additional extension in response to acidic pHe2
Direction
highere2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Zea mays Coleoptile Cell Walls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–75 · show in text ↑
e2

“The additional extension in response to acidic pH was higher when cell walls had been previously autolysed for 24 h at pH 5.5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–652 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The acid-pH effect appeared to depend on thermo-labile factors, suggesting a participation of expansins.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayst0
Gene
expansinse3
Outcome
acid-pH effecte3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Zea mays Coleoptile Cell Walls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–75 · show in text ↑
e3

“Furthermore, the acid-pH effect was dependent on the presence during the constant load extension of some thermo-labile factors, suggesting the participation of expansins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–823 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acid pH increased the plastic extension (Ep) of native cell walls.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayst0
Treatment
Acid pHe4
Outcome
plastic extension (Ep)e4
Direction
increasee4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Zea mays Coleoptile Cell Walls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–75 · show in text ↑
e4

“Acid pH increased Ea of native cell walls through an increase in the plastic extension (Ep)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–916 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acid pH increased the additional extension (Ea) of native cell walls.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayst0
Treatment
Acid pHe4
Outcome
Ea of native cell wallse4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Zea mays Coleoptile Cell Walls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–75 · show in text ↑
e4

“Acid pH increased Ea of native cell walls through an increase in the plastic extension (Ep)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–916 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Autolytic degradation of glucan increased the elastic extension (Ee) of maize coleoptile cell walls in response to pH 4.5 buffer.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayst0
Treatment
autolytic degradatione5
Outcome
elastic extension (Ee)e5
Direction
increasinge5
Qualifier
in response to pH 4.5 buffere5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Zea mays Coleoptile Cell Walls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–75 · show in text ↑
e5

“The autolytic degradation of β(1–3), (1–4)-D-glucan was also able to modify the mechanical properties of maize coleoptile cell walls increasing its elastic extension (Ee) in response to pH 4.5 buffer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1246 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased wall extension after autolysis appears to depend on active expansins, suggesting cooperation between glucan turnover and expansin action.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayst0
Gene
expansinse6
Outcome
wall extensione6
Qualifier
a cooperation between β-glucan turnover and expansin actione6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Zea mays Coleoptile Cell Walls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–75 · show in text ↑
e6

“but that modification only leads to an increase in wall extension when expansins are active, suggesting a cooperation between β-glucan turnover and expansin action”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1410 · show in text ↑

ph · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.