Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine effects of salinity applications on emergence rate, salt tolerance index and nutritient uptake in Triticale. Triticale cultivar Karma-2000 and 5 Triticale genotypes (4, 20, 23, 27 and 43) were used as experimental materials. The study was conducted to observe effects of different salt concentrations (EC value: 3.9, 6.1, 8.3, 10.5, 14.9, 19.3, 25.0 dSm -1 ) on emergence rate, dry weights of green parts/roots, salt tolerance index, mineral elements (N, P, K, Ca, Na, Fe, Mn, Mg, Zn and Cu) and proline. As salt concentration increased; emergence rate, shoot and root length, dry weights of green parts and roots, and the mineral content of both roots and leaves decreased considerably. On the other hand, proline content increased when higher salt concentrations used. Genotypes differed to their reactions to different salt concentrations. Among the genotypes, the least amount of proline content was found in Karma-2000 and the highest proline content was found in genotypes 27 and 43. According to salt tolerance index results, genotype 27 was resistant and genotypes 20 and 43 were tolerant to salt stress.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Higher salt concentration decreased emergence rate, shoot and root length, dry weights, and root and leaf mineral content in triticale.
- Taxon
- Triticale
×Triticosecalet0 - Treatment
- salt concentratione0
- Outcome
- emergence rate, shoot and root length, dry weights of green parts and roots, and the mineral content of both roots and leavese0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“As salt concentration increased; emergence rate, shoot and root length, dry weights of green parts and roots, and the mineral content of both roots and leaves decreased considerably.”
t0“Triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
Higher salt concentration increased triticale proline content.
- Taxon
- Triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Treatment
- higher salt concentrationse0
- Outcome
- proline contente0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“On the other hand, proline content increased when higher salt concentrations used.”
t0“Triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
Triticale genotypes differed in their reactions to salt concentrations.
- Taxon
- Triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Outcome
- reactions to different salt concentrationse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Genotypes differed to their reactions to different salt concentrations.”
t0“Triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
Karma-2000 had the least proline content.
- Taxon
- Triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Material
- Karma-2000e0
- Outcome
- proline contente0
- Direction
- leaste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the least amount of proline content was found in Karma-2000”
t0“Triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
Genotypes 27 and 43 had the highest proline content.
- Taxon
- Triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Material
- genotypes 27 and 43e0
- Outcome
- proline contente0
- Direction
- higheste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the highest proline content was found in genotypes 27 and 43”
t0“Triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
Genotype 27 was resistant to salt stress by the salt tolerance index.
- Taxon
- Triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Material
- genotype 27e0
- Outcome
- resistante0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“genotype 27 was resistant”
t0“Triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
Genotypes 20 and 43 were tolerant to salt stress by the salt tolerance index.
- Taxon
- Triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Material
- genotypes 20 and 43e0
- Outcome
- tolerant to salt stresse0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“genotypes 20 and 43 were tolerant to salt stress”
t0“Triticale”
The same questions in other papers
salinity · growth · x Triticosecale (triticale)Results agree
10 papers in the same direction as this paper
- negative
- negative
- negative
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.