Paper · 2015 · Agricultural Sciences

Pendimethalin Residues from Weed Management in Dry Bean Can Cause Injury in Autumn Seeded Winter Wheat

Nader Soltani; Christy Shropshire; Peter H. Sikkema

6
claims
9
verbatim quotes
8
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

There is little information on effect of pendimethalin residues in the soil used for weed management in dry bean, on winter wheat seeded 3 to 4 months after application in Ontario. A total of four field experiments were conducted over a four-year period (2008-2011) in Ontario to evaluate the effect of pendimethalin residues on winter wheat injury and yield grown in rotation with dry bean. Pendimethalin, applied PPI in dry bean, at 1080 and 2160 g ai ha-1 caused 1% to 3% injury and 4% to 9% winter wheat injury evaluated 1 and 4 weeks after emergence (WAE) in the fall and on approximately the first of May, June and July of the following year. Pendimethalin applied PPI in the spring at 1X or 2X manufacturer’s recommended rate (1080 or 2160 g ai ha-1) in dry bean caused no adverse effect on the winter wheat height evaluated in July of the following year and no adverse effect on maturity at harvest. Pendimethalin applied PPI at 1080 g ai ha-1 in dry bean in the spring caused no adverse effect on winter wheat yield, but pendimethalin applied at 2160 g ai ha-1 rate caused a 4% reduction in yield of winter wheat. Based on this study, pendimethalin applied PPI at 2160 g ai ha-1 has potential to cause injury and yield reduction in winter wheat grown in rotation with dry bean under Ontario environmental conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin residues from dry bean weed control caused 4% to 9% injury to winter wheat evaluated 1 and 4 weeks after emergence.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
Pendimethalin, applied PPI in dry bean, at 1080 and 2160 g ai ha-1e1
Outcome
winter wheat injurye1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Value
4% to 9%e1
Qualifier
evaluated 1 and 4 weeks after emergence (WAE)e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Pendimethalin, applied PPI in dry bean, at 1080 and 2160 g ai ha-1 caused 1% to 3% injury and 4% to 9% winter wheat injury evaluated 1 and 4 weeks after emergence (WAE)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–560 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin applied PPI in dry bean at 1080 and 2160 g ai ha-1 caused 1% to 3% injury.

Taxon
dry beane1
Treatment
Pendimethalin, applied PPI in dry bean, at 1080 and 2160 g ai ha-1e1
Outcome
injurye1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Value
1% to 3%e1
Qualifier
evaluated 1 and 4 weeks after emergence (WAE)e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“Pendimethalin, applied PPI in dry bean, at 1080 and 2160 g ai ha-1 caused 1% to 3% injury and 4% to 9% winter wheat injury evaluated 1 and 4 weeks after emergence (WAE)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–560 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin applied PPI in spring at 1X or 2X the recommended rate had no adverse effect on winter wheat height evaluated in July of the following year.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
Pendimethalin applied PPI in the spring at 1X or 2Xe3
Outcome
winter wheat heighte2
Direction
no adverse effecte2
Qualifier
evaluated in July of the following yeare2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“caused no adverse effect on the winter wheat height evaluated in July of the following year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–861 · show in text ↑
e3

“Pendimethalin applied PPI in the spring at 1X or 2X”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–700 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin applied PPI in spring at 1X or 2X the recommended rate had no adverse effect on maturity at harvest of winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
Pendimethalin applied PPI in the spring at 1X or 2Xe3
Outcome
maturity at harveste4
Direction
no adverse effecte4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“caused no adverse effect on the winter wheat height evaluated in July of the following year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–861 · show in text ↑
e3

“Pendimethalin applied PPI in the spring at 1X or 2X”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–700 · show in text ↑
e4

“no adverse effect on maturity at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–906 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin applied PPI at 1080 g ai ha-1 in dry bean in spring had no adverse effect on winter wheat yield.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume5
Treatment
Pendimethalin applied PPI at 1080 g ai ha-1 in dry bean in the springe5
Outcome
winter wheat yielde5
Direction
no adverse effecte5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Pendimethalin applied PPI at 1080 g ai ha-1 in dry bean in the spring caused no adverse effect on winter wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1024 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin applied at 2160 g ai ha-1 caused a 4% reduction in winter wheat yield.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume6
Treatment
pendimethalin applied at 2160 g ai ha-1 ratee6
Outcome
yield of winter wheate6
Direction
reductione6
Value
4%e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“pendimethalin applied at 2160 g ai ha-1 rate caused a 4% reduction in yield of winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1121 · show in text ↑

pendimethalin · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

66 papers: 57 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 57 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

pendimethalin · crop injury · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

pendimethalin · crop injury · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

pendimethalin · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.