Paper · 2009 · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

Comparative Performance of Rice with System of Rice Intensification (SRI) and Conventional Management using Different Plant Spacings

A. K. Thakur; S. Rath; S. Roychowdhury; et al.

19
claims
41
verbatim quotes
115
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract The System of Rice Intensification (SRI) reportedly enhances the yields of rice ( Oryza sativa L.) through synergy among several agronomic management practices. This study was conducted to investigate the effects on rice plant characteristics and yield by comparing the plants grown with different methods of cultivation – SRI vs. recommended management practices (RMP) focusing on the impact of different plant spacings. Performance of individual hills was significantly improved with wider spacing compared with closer‐spaced hills in terms of root growth and xylem exudation rates, leaf number and leaf sizes, canopy angle, tiller and panicle number, panicle length and grain number per panicle, grain filling and 1000‐grain weight and straw weight, irrespective of whether SRI or RMP was employed. Both sets of practices gave their highest grain yield with the spacing of 20 × 20 cm; however, SRI yielded 40 % more than the recommended practice. At this spacing, canopies also had the highest leaf area index (LAI) and light interception during flowering stage. The lowest yield was recorded at 30 × 30 cm spacing under both the practices, as a result of less plant population (11 m −2 ), despite improved hill performance. During the ripening stage, hills with wider spacing had larger root dry weight, produced greater xylem exudates, and transported these towards shoot at faster rates. These features contributed to the maintenance of higher chlorophyll levels, enhanced fluorescence and photosynthesis rates of leaves and supported more favourable yield attributes and grain yield in individual hills than in closely‐spaced plants. Moreover, these parameters further improved in SRI, apart from the enhanced percentage of effective tillers and showed substantial and positive impacts on grain yield (17 %) compared with recommended practice. In conclusion, wide spacing beyond optimum plant density, however, does not give higher grain yield on an area basis and for achieving this, a combination of improved hills with optimum plant population must be worked out for SRI.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wider spacing significantly improved root growth and xylem exudation rates of individual hills compared with closer spacing.

Treatment
wider spacinge0
Outcome
root growth and xylem exudation ratese0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
irrespective of whether SRI or RMP was employede0
Comparator
closer‐spaced hillse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Performance of individual hills was significantly improved with wider spacing compared with closer‐spaced hills in terms of root growth and xylem exudation rates, leaf number and leaf sizes, canopy angle, tiller and panicle number, panicle length and grain number per panicle, grain filling and 1000‐grain weight and straw weight, irrespective of whether SRI or RMP was employed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–809 · show in text ↑
t0

“Comparative Performance of Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wider spacing significantly improved leaf number, leaf sizes and canopy angle of individual hills.

Treatment
wider spacinge0
Outcome
leaf number and leaf sizes, canopy anglee0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
irrespective of whether SRI or RMP was employede0
Comparator
closer‐spaced hillse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Performance of individual hills was significantly improved with wider spacing compared with closer‐spaced hills in terms of root growth and xylem exudation rates, leaf number and leaf sizes, canopy angle, tiller and panicle number, panicle length and grain number per panicle, grain filling and 1000‐grain weight and straw weight, irrespective of whether SRI or RMP was employed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–809 · show in text ↑
t0

“Comparative Performance of Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wider spacing significantly improved tiller and panicle number and panicle length of individual hills.

Treatment
wider spacinge0
Outcome
tiller and panicle number, panicle lengthe0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
irrespective of whether SRI or RMP was employede0
Comparator
closer‐spaced hillse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Performance of individual hills was significantly improved with wider spacing compared with closer‐spaced hills in terms of root growth and xylem exudation rates, leaf number and leaf sizes, canopy angle, tiller and panicle number, panicle length and grain number per panicle, grain filling and 1000‐grain weight and straw weight, irrespective of whether SRI or RMP was employed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–809 · show in text ↑
t0

“Comparative Performance of Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wider spacing significantly improved grain number per panicle, grain filling and 1000-grain weight of individual hills.

Treatment
wider spacinge0
Outcome
grain number per panicle, grain filling and 1000‐grain weighte0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
irrespective of whether SRI or RMP was employede0
Comparator
closer‐spaced hillse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Performance of individual hills was significantly improved with wider spacing compared with closer‐spaced hills in terms of root growth and xylem exudation rates, leaf number and leaf sizes, canopy angle, tiller and panicle number, panicle length and grain number per panicle, grain filling and 1000‐grain weight and straw weight, irrespective of whether SRI or RMP was employed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–809 · show in text ↑
t0

“Comparative Performance of Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wider spacing significantly improved straw weight of individual hills.

Treatment
wider spacinge0
Outcome
straw weighte0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
irrespective of whether SRI or RMP was employede0
Comparator
closer‐spaced hillse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Performance of individual hills was significantly improved with wider spacing compared with closer‐spaced hills in terms of root growth and xylem exudation rates, leaf number and leaf sizes, canopy angle, tiller and panicle number, panicle length and grain number per panicle, grain filling and 1000‐grain weight and straw weight, irrespective of whether SRI or RMP was employed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–809 · show in text ↑
t0

“Comparative Performance of Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both SRI and recommended practice gave their highest grain yield at the 20 × 20 cm spacing.

Treatment
spacing of 20 × 20 cme0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both sets of practices gave their highest grain yield with the spacing of 20 × 20 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–895 · show in text ↑
t0

“Comparative Performance of Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI yielded 40% more grain than the recommended practice.

Treatment
SRIe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
moree0
Value
40 %e0
Comparator
the recommended practicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“however, SRI yielded 40 % more than the recommended practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–957 · show in text ↑
t0

“Comparative Performance of Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–31 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 20 × 20 cm spacing, canopies had the highest leaf area index and light interception at flowering stage.

Organ / stage
flowering stagee0
Outcome
leaf area index (LAI) and light interceptione0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At this spacing, canopies also had the highest leaf area index (LAI) and light interception during flowering stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1073 · show in text ↑
t0

“Comparative Performance of Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest yield was recorded at 30 × 30 cm spacing under both practices, despite improved hill performance.

Treatment
30 × 30 cm spacinge0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
loweste0
Qualifier
less plant population (11 m −2 )e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest yield was recorded at 30 × 30 cm spacing under both the practices, as a result of less plant population (11 m −2 ), despite improved hill performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1235 · show in text ↑
t0

“Comparative Performance of Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

During ripening, hills at wider spacing had larger root dry weight.

Organ / stage
ripening stagee0
Treatment
wider spacinge0
Outcome
root dry weighte0
Direction
largere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the ripening stage, hills with wider spacing had larger root dry weight, produced greater xylem exudates, and transported these towards shoot at faster rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1401 · show in text ↑
t0

“Comparative Performance of Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

During ripening, hills at wider spacing produced greater xylem exudates.

Organ / stage
ripening stagee0
Treatment
wider spacinge0
Outcome
xylem exudatese0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the ripening stage, hills with wider spacing had larger root dry weight, produced greater xylem exudates, and transported these towards shoot at faster rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1401 · show in text ↑
t0

“Comparative Performance of Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

During ripening, hills at wider spacing transported xylem sap toward the shoot at faster rates.

Organ / stage
ripening stagee0
Treatment
wider spacinge0
Outcome
transported these towards shoote0
Direction
fastere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the ripening stage, hills with wider spacing had larger root dry weight, produced greater xylem exudates, and transported these towards shoot at faster rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1401 · show in text ↑
t0

“Comparative Performance of Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wider spacing contributed to higher chlorophyll levels in individual hills than in closely spaced plants.

Treatment
wider spacinge0
Outcome
chlorophyll levelse1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
closely‐spaced plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the ripening stage, hills with wider spacing had larger root dry weight, produced greater xylem exudates, and transported these towards shoot at faster rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1401 · show in text ↑
e1

“These features contributed to the maintenance of higher chlorophyll levels, enhanced fluorescence and photosynthesis rates of leaves and supported more favourable yield attributes and grain yield in individual hills than in closely‐spaced plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1403–1648 · show in text ↑
t0

“Comparative Performance of Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wider spacing enhanced fluorescence and photosynthesis rates of leaves in individual hills.

Treatment
wider spacinge0
Outcome
fluorescence and photosynthesis rates of leavese1
Direction
enhancede1
Comparator
closely‐spaced plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the ripening stage, hills with wider spacing had larger root dry weight, produced greater xylem exudates, and transported these towards shoot at faster rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1401 · show in text ↑
e1

“These features contributed to the maintenance of higher chlorophyll levels, enhanced fluorescence and photosynthesis rates of leaves and supported more favourable yield attributes and grain yield in individual hills than in closely‐spaced plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1403–1648 · show in text ↑
t0

“Comparative Performance of Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wider spacing supported more favourable yield attributes and grain yield in individual hills than in closely spaced plants.

Treatment
wider spacinge0
Outcome
yield attributes and grain yielde1
Direction
more favourablee1
Comparator
closely‐spaced plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the ripening stage, hills with wider spacing had larger root dry weight, produced greater xylem exudates, and transported these towards shoot at faster rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1401 · show in text ↑
e1

“These features contributed to the maintenance of higher chlorophyll levels, enhanced fluorescence and photosynthesis rates of leaves and supported more favourable yield attributes and grain yield in individual hills than in closely‐spaced plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1403–1648 · show in text ↑
t0

“Comparative Performance of Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI enhanced the percentage of effective tillers compared with recommended practice.

Treatment
SRIe0
Outcome
percentage of effective tillerse0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
recommended practicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Moreover, these parameters further improved in SRI, apart from the enhanced percentage of effective tillers and showed substantial and positive impacts on grain yield (17 %) compared with recommended practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1858 · show in text ↑
t0

“Comparative Performance of Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI had a substantial positive impact of 17% on grain yield compared with recommended practice.

Treatment
SRIe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
positivee0
Value
17 %e0
Comparator
recommended practicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Moreover, these parameters further improved in SRI, apart from the enhanced percentage of effective tillers and showed substantial and positive impacts on grain yield (17 %) compared with recommended practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1858 · show in text ↑
t0

“Comparative Performance of Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wide spacing beyond optimum plant density does not give higher grain yield on an area basis.

Treatment
wide spacing beyond optimum plant densitye0
Outcome
grain yield on an area basise0
Direction
does not give highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In conclusion, wide spacing beyond optimum plant density, however, does not give higher grain yield on an area basis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1860–1976 · show in text ↑
t0

“Comparative Performance of Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–31 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A combination of improved hills with optimum plant population must be worked out for SRI.

Outcome
a combination of improved hills with optimum plant populatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a combination of improved hills with optimum plant population must be worked out for SRI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2001–2089 · show in text ↑
t0

“Comparative Performance of Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–31 · show in text ↑

density · physiology: pigments · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

density · physiology: photosynthesis · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

density · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

96 papers: 73 positive, 23 negative or no effect

72 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

92 papers more in this group

See all 96 papers →

density · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

395 papers: 330 positive, 65 negative or no effect

329 papers in the same direction as this paper · 58 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

391 papers more in this group

See all 395 papers →

irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,171 papers: 906 positive, 265 negative or no effect

905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 201 in the opposite direction · 64 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,167 papers more in this group

See all 1,171 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.