Paper · 2001 · Journal of Food Science

Effects of Gamma Irradiation on the Texture of Minimally Processed Apple Slices

G. Gunes; J.H. Hotchkiss; C.B. Watkins

8
claims
27
verbatim quotes
56
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Fresh‐cut apples with or without calcium treatments were irradiated at doses up to 5 kGy at 0.4 and 2 kGy.h ‐1 dose rates with a Co 60 source in 0, 21, and 100% O 2 atmospheres. Firmness decreased as irradiation dose increased beyond a 0.34 kGy threshold. High dose rate initially resulted in less softening compared to low dose rate, but dose rate became insignificant upon storage. Irradiation atmosphere did not affect firmness. Softening of irradiated slices correlated positively with water‐soluble pectin, and negatively with oxalate‐soluble pectin content. Calcium prevented irradiation‐induced softening of thin slices (3‐4 mm thick), but was not effective with thicker wedges due to limited penetration.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Firmness decreased above a 0.34 kGy irradiation threshold.

Treatment
irradiation dosee0
Outcome
Firmnesse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
0.34 kGye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Firmness decreased as irradiation dose increased beyond a 0.34 kGy threshold.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–265 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fresh‐cut apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High dose rate initially caused less softening than low dose rate.

Treatment
High dose ratee0
Outcome
softeninge0
Direction
lesse0
Qualifier
initiallye0
Comparator
low dose ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High dose rate initially resulted in less softening compared to low dose rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–343 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fresh‐cut apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The dose-rate difference became insignificant after storage.

Treatment
dose ratee0
Outcome
dose ratee0
Qualifier
upon storagee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dose rate became insignificant upon storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–392 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fresh‐cut apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation atmosphere did not affect firmness.

Treatment
Irradiation atmospheree0
Outcome
firmnesse0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irradiation atmosphere did not affect firmness.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–441 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fresh‐cut apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–26 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Softening correlated positively with water-soluble pectin.

Compound
water‐soluble pectine0
Outcome
Softeninge0
Direction
positivelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Softening of irradiated slices correlated positively with water‐soluble pectin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–520 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fresh‐cut apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–26 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Softening correlated negatively with oxalate-soluble pectin.

Compound
oxalate‐soluble pectine0
Outcome
Softeninge2
Direction
negativelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“negatively with oxalate‐soluble pectin content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–572 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fresh‐cut apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–26 · show in text ↑
e2

“Softening of irradiated slices correlated positively with water‐soluble pectin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–520 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium prevented irradiation-induced softening of thin slices.

Treatment
Calciume0
Outcome
softeninge0
Direction
preventede0
Value
3‐4 mme0
Qualifier
thin slicese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Calcium prevented irradiation‐induced softening of thin slices (3‐4 mm thick)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–651 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fresh‐cut apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–26 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium was ineffective on thicker wedges because penetration was limited.

Treatment
Calciume3
Outcome
softeninge2
Direction
not effectivee0
Qualifier
thicker wedgese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was not effective with thicker wedges due to limited penetration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–721 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fresh‐cut apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–26 · show in text ↑
e2

“Softening of irradiated slices correlated positively with water‐soluble pectin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–520 · show in text ↑
e3

“Calcium prevented irradiation‐induced softening of thin slices (3‐4 mm thick)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–651 · show in text ↑

calcium atom · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

38 papers: 33 positive, 5 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

radiation · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 5 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.