Paper · 2012 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

The influence of organic and conventional cultivation systems on the nutritional value and content of bioactive compounds in selected tomato types

Ewelina Hallmann

6
claims
6
verbatim quotes
195
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tomato fruits contain a high level of antioxidants such as vitamin C, polyphenols (including flavonoids), and carotenoids (such as lycopene and β-carotene). Some studies have shown the higher level of bioactive compounds in organically produced tomato fruits compared to conventional ones, but not all studies were consistent in this respect. The levels of carotenoids and phenolics are very variable and may be affected by ripeness, genotype and cultivation. The aim of the study was to compare the effects of organic and conventional production systems on chemical properties and phenolic compounds of two tomato types (standard and cherry). The experiment was carried out in two growing seasons of 2008 and 2009, and in three organic and three conventional farms. RESULTS: The results obtained have shown that, in 2008, organic tomatoes presented a higher ratio of reducing sugars/organic acids, and contained significantly more total sugars, vitamin C and total flavonoids, 3-quercetin rutinoside, and myricetin in comparison with the conventional fruits. In 2009, organic tomatoes contained significantly more vitamin C, quercetin-3-O-glucoside and chlorogenic acid, myricetin and kaempferol in comparison with the conventional fruits. CONCLUSIONS: The organic growing system affects tomato quality parameters such as nutritional value and phenolic compound content. The second significant factor of nutritional value of tomato is the type of fruits. It would be necessary to continue this study as a long-term experiment in order to eliminate the influence of seasonality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2008 organic tomatoes had a higher reducing-sugars to organic-acids ratio.

Treatment
organice0
Outcome
ratio of reducing sugars/organic acidse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
2008e0
Comparator
conventional fruitse0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in 2008, organic tomatoes presented a higher ratio of reducing sugars/organic acids, and contained significantly more total sugars, vitamin C and total flavonoids, 3-quercetin rutinoside, and myricetin in comparison with the conventional fruits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–1071 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2008 organic tomatoes contained significantly more total sugars, vitamin C and total flavonoids than conventional fruit.

Treatment
organice0
Outcome
total sugars, vitamin C and total flavonoidse0
Direction
moree0
Qualifier
2008e0
Comparator
conventional fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in 2008, organic tomatoes presented a higher ratio of reducing sugars/organic acids, and contained significantly more total sugars, vitamin C and total flavonoids, 3-quercetin rutinoside, and myricetin in comparison with the conventional fruits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–1071 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2008 organic tomatoes contained significantly more 3-quercetin rutinoside and myricetin.

Treatment
organice0
Outcome
3-quercetin rutinoside, and myricetine0
Direction
moree0
Qualifier
2008e0
Comparator
conventional fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in 2008, organic tomatoes presented a higher ratio of reducing sugars/organic acids, and contained significantly more total sugars, vitamin C and total flavonoids, 3-quercetin rutinoside, and myricetin in comparison with the conventional fruits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–1071 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2009 organic tomatoes contained significantly more vitamin C, quercetin-3-O-glucoside and chlorogenic acid.

Treatment
organice0
Outcome
vitamin C, quercetin-3-O-glucoside and chlorogenic acide0
Direction
moree0
Qualifier
2009e0
Comparator
conventional fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2009, organic tomatoes contained significantly more vitamin C, quercetin-3-O-glucoside and chlorogenic acid, myricetin and kaempferol in comparison with the conventional fruits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1252 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2009 organic tomatoes contained significantly more myricetin and kaempferol.

Treatment
organice0
Outcome
myricetin and kaempferole0
Direction
moree0
Qualifier
2009e0
Comparator
conventional fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2009, organic tomatoes contained significantly more vitamin C, quercetin-3-O-glucoside and chlorogenic acid, myricetin and kaempferol in comparison with the conventional fruits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1252 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit type was a significant factor in tomato nutritional value.

Material
type of fruitse0
Outcome
nutritional valuee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The second significant factor of nutritional value of tomato is the type of fruits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1467 · show in text ↑

cultivation system · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

17 papers: 12 positive, 5 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

cultivation system · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 11 positive, 5 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

cultivation system · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 15 positive, 5 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.