Paper · 2003 · Tree Physiology

Free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) enhances biomass production in a short-rotation poplar plantation

C. Calfapietra; B. Gielen; A. N. J. Galema; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
108
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This paper investigates the possible contribution of Short Rotation Cultures (SRC) to carbon sequestration in both current and elevated atmospheric CO2 concentrations ([CO2]). A dense poplar plantation (1 x 1 m) was exposed to a [CO2] of 550 ppm in Central Italy using the free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) technique. Three species of Populus were examined, namely P. alba L., P. nigra L. and P. x euramericana Dode (Guinier). Aboveground woody biomass of trees exposed to elevated [CO2] for three growing seasons increased by 15 to 27%, depending on species. As a result, light-use efficiency increased. Aboveground biomass allocation was unaffected, and belowground biomass also increased under elevated [CO2] conditions, by 22 to 38%. Populus nigra, with total biomass equal to 62.02 and 72.03 Mg ha-1 in ambient and elevated [CO2], respectively, was the most productive species, although its productivity was stimulated least by atmospheric CO2 enrichment. There was greater depletion of inorganic nitrogen from the soil after three growing seasons in elevated [CO2], but no effect of [CO2] on stem wood density, which differed significantly only among species.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased aboveground woody biomass by 15 to 27% after three seasons.

Taxon
poplarPopulust0
Treatment
elevated [CO2]e0
Outcome
Aboveground woody biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
15 to 27%e0
Qualifier
depending on speciese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“Aboveground woody biomass of trees exposed to elevated [CO2] for three growing seasons increased by 15 to 27%, depending on species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–555 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light-use efficiency increased with elevated CO2.

Taxon
poplarPopulust0
Treatment
CO2e1
Outcome
light-use efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“As a result, light-use efficiency increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–600 · show in text ↑
e1

“Aboveground woody biomass of trees exposed to elevated [CO2] for three growing seasons increased by 15 to 27%, depending on species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–555 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aboveground biomass allocation was unaffected by elevated CO2.

Taxon
poplarPopulust0
Treatment
CO2e1
Outcome
Aboveground biomass allocatione0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“Aboveground biomass allocation was unaffected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–647 · show in text ↑
e1

“Belowground biomass also increased under elevated [CO2] conditions”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 653–719 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Belowground biomass increased 22 to 38% under elevated CO2.

Taxon
poplarPopulust0
Treatment
elevated [CO2]e0
Outcome
belowground biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
22 to 38%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“belowground biomass also increased under elevated [CO2] conditions, by 22 to 38%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–733 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Populus nigra was the most productive species, with 62.02 and 72.03 Mg ha-1 total biomass under ambient and elevated CO2.

Taxon
Populus nigraPopulus nigrae0
Outcome
total biomasse0
Direction
most productivee0
Value
62.02 and 72.03 Mg ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus nigra
Populus nigra · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Populus nigra, with total biomass equal to 62.02 and 72.03 Mg ha-1 in ambient and elevated [CO2], respectively, was the most productive species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–878 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Populus nigra had the least productivity stimulation from CO2 enrichment.

Taxon
Populus nigraPopulus nigrae0
Treatment
atmospheric CO2 enrichmente0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
stimulated leaste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus nigra
Populus nigra · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Populus nigra, with total biomass equal to 62.02 and 72.03 Mg ha-1 in ambient and elevated [CO2], respectively, was the most productive species, although its productivity was stimulated least by atmospheric CO2 enrichment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–956 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil inorganic nitrogen depletion was greater under elevated CO2.

Treatment
elevated [CO2]e0
Outcome
depletion of inorganic nitrogen from the soile0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

t0

“poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“There was greater depletion of inorganic nitrogen from the soil after three growing seasons in elevated [CO2]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1067 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 had no effect on stem wood density.

Taxon
poplarPopulust0
Treatment
[CO2]e0
Outcome
stem wood densitye0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“no effect of [CO2] on stem wood density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem wood density differed significantly among species.

Taxon
poplarPopulust0
Outcome
stem wood densitye0
Direction
differede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“poplar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“stem wood density, which differed significantly only among species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1161 · show in text ↑

co2 · growth · Populus (poplar)Results differ

19 papers: 18 positive, 1 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.