Paper · 2014 · Journal of Plant Pathology & Microbiology

Root-rot and Stem-canker Control in Faba Bean Plants by Using Some Biofertilizers Agents

Safinaz A Farfour

15
claims
33
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

Some biofertilizers agents i.e. Rhizobium leguminosarum var. fabae, Bacillus megaterium var., phosphaticum and Trichoderma harizianum play important roles in enhancing the plant growth and controlling several diseases i. e. root rot and stem canker disease. In this work, under greenhouse conditions, Rhizoctonia solani caused dampingoff and death of all faba bean seedlings, however the three tested microorganisms resulted good biocontol role against the pathogenic fungus and the application of T. harizianum gave the best result in this trend. The treatment of T. harizianum and R. leguminosarum var. fabae to the soil infested with Rhizoctonia solani showed significant increase in leaves number of faba bean plants compared with the untreated plants or which treated plants or which treated with Bacillus megaterium var., phosphaticum after 40 days from planting. Application of T. harizianum and R. leguminosarum var. fabae gave the best plant growth while the presence of the pathogenic fungus showed significant decrease in fresh weight, dry weight and nodules number on roots of faba bean plants. Also, polyphenols and antioxidants contents in the shoots and roots were decreased in the presence of the pathogen compared with the untreated plants. Application of R. leguminosarum resulted significant increase in the roots and shoots total nitrogen and protein.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizoctonia solani caused damping off and death of all faba bean seedlings in the greenhouse.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
dampingoff and death of all faba bean seedlingse0
Setting
greenhouse conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under greenhouse conditions, Rhizoctonia solani caused dampingoff and death of all faba bean seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–374 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium leguminosarum var. fabae showed biocontrol activity against the pathogenic fungus.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Treatment
Rhizobium leguminosarum var. fabaee0
Interactor
Rhizobium leguminosarum var. fabaeRhizobium leguminosarume0symbiont
Outcome
good biocontol role against the pathogenic funguse1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium leguminosarum
Rhizobium leguminosarum · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryQaswarah 21 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rhizobium leguminosarum var. fabae, Bacillus megaterium var., phosphaticum and Trichoderma harizianum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–133 · show in text ↑
e1

“the three tested microorganisms resulted good biocontol role against the pathogenic fungus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–474 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus megaterium showed biocontrol activity against the pathogenic fungus.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Treatment
Bacillus megaterium var., phosphaticume0
Interactor
Bacillus megaterium var., phosphaticume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
good biocontol role against the pathogenic funguse1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacillus megaterium var., phosphaticum and Trichoderma harizianum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–133 · show in text ↑
e1

“the three tested microorganisms resulted good biocontol role against the pathogenic fungus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–474 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma harizianum gave the best biocontrol result among tested microorganisms.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Treatment
T. harizianume0
Interactor
Trichoderma harizianume1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
best resulte0
Direction
beste0
Comparator
the three tested microorganismse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of T. harizianum gave the best result in this trend”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–546 · show in text ↑
e1

“Trichoderma harizianum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–133 · show in text ↑
e2

“the three tested microorganisms resulted good biocontol role against the pathogenic fungus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–474 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma treatment significantly increased faba bean leaf number relative to untreated and Bacillus treated plants after 40 days.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
T. harizianume0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Second interactor
T. harizianume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
leaves numbere0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
after 40 days from plantinge0
Comparator
untreated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment of T. harizianum and R. leguminosarum var. fabae to the soil infested with Rhizoctonia solani showed significant increase in leaves number of faba bean plants compared with the untreated plants or which treated plants or which treated with Bacillus megaterium var., phosphaticum after 40 days from planting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–869 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium treatment significantly increased faba bean leaf number after 40 days.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
R. leguminosarum var. fabaee0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Second interactor
R. leguminosarum var. fabaeRhizobium leguminosarume0symbiont
Outcome
leaves numbere0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
after 40 days from plantinge0
Comparator
untreated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Rhizobium leguminosarum
Rhizobium leguminosarum · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryQaswarah 21 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment of T. harizianum and R. leguminosarum var. fabae to the soil infested with Rhizoctonia solani showed significant increase in leaves number of faba bean plants compared with the untreated plants or which treated plants or which treated with Bacillus megaterium var., phosphaticum after 40 days from planting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–869 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma application gave the best faba bean growth.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Treatment
T. harizianume0
Interactor
T. harizianume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of T. harizianum and R. leguminosarum var. fabae gave the best plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–957 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium application gave the best faba bean growth.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Treatment
R. leguminosarum var. fabaee0
Interactor
R. leguminosarum var. fabaeRhizobium leguminosarume0symbiont
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium leguminosarum
Rhizobium leguminosarum · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryQaswarah 21 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of T. harizianum and R. leguminosarum var. fabae gave the best plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–957 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizoctonia significantly decreased faba bean fresh weight.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
presence of the pathogenic funguse0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie1pathogen
Outcome
fresh weighte0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the presence of the pathogenic fungus showed significant decrease in fresh weight, dry weight and nodules number on roots of faba bean plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1106 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rhizoctonia solani caused dampingoff”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–337 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizoctonia significantly decreased faba bean dry weight.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
presence of the pathogenic funguse0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie1pathogen
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the presence of the pathogenic fungus showed significant decrease in fresh weight, dry weight and nodules number on roots of faba bean plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1106 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rhizoctonia solani caused dampingoff”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–337 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizoctonia significantly decreased root nodule number in faba bean.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
presence of the pathogenic funguse0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie1pathogen
Outcome
nodules numbere0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the presence of the pathogenic fungus showed significant decrease in fresh weight, dry weight and nodules number on roots of faba bean plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1106 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rhizoctonia solani caused dampingoff”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–337 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The pathogen decreased polyphenol content in faba bean shoots and roots versus untreated plants.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae1
Organ / stage
shoots and rootse0
Treatment
presence of the pathogene0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie2pathogen
Outcome
polyphenolse0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
untreated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“polyphenols and antioxidants contents in the shoots and roots were decreased in the presence of the pathogen compared with the untreated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1257 · show in text ↑
e1

“roots of faba bean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1105 · show in text ↑
e2

“Rhizoctonia solani caused dampingoff”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–337 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The pathogen decreased antioxidant content in faba bean shoots and roots versus untreated plants.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae1
Organ / stage
shoots and rootse0
Treatment
presence of the pathogene0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie2pathogen
Outcome
antioxidants contentse0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
untreated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“polyphenols and antioxidants contents in the shoots and roots were decreased in the presence of the pathogen compared with the untreated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1257 · show in text ↑
e1

“roots of faba bean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1105 · show in text ↑
e2

“Rhizoctonia solani caused dampingoff”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–337 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium significantly increased total nitrogen in faba bean roots and shoots.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae1
Organ / stage
roots and shootse0
Treatment
R. leguminosarume0
Interactor
R. leguminosarumRhizobium leguminosarume0symbiont
Outcome
total nitrogene0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium leguminosarum
Rhizobium leguminosarum · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryQaswarah 21 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of R. leguminosarum resulted significant increase in the roots and shoots total nitrogen and protein.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1371 · show in text ↑
e1

“roots of faba bean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium significantly increased protein in faba bean roots and shoots.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae1
Organ / stage
roots and shootse0
Treatment
R. leguminosarume0
Interactor
R. leguminosarumRhizobium leguminosarume0symbiont
Outcome
proteine0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium leguminosarum
Rhizobium leguminosarum · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryQaswarah 21 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of R. leguminosarum resulted significant increase in the roots and shoots total nitrogen and protein.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1371 · show in text ↑
e1

“roots of faba bean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1105 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium leguminosarum · Rhizoctonia solani · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Rhizobium leguminosarum · disease · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Rhizobium leguminosarum · quality: protein · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Rhizobium leguminosarum · nutrient: content · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Priestia megaterium · disease · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Rhizobium leguminosarum · growth · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.