Paper · 2013 · Phytopathology

The Effect of Transitional Organic Production Practices on Soilborne Pests of Tomato in a Simulated Microplot Study

Dan O. Chellemi; Erin N. Rosskopf; Nancy Kokalis-Burelle

6
claims
15
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The perceived risk of pest resurgence upon transition from conventional to organic-based farming systems remains a critical obstacle to expanding organic vegetable production, particularly where chemical fumigants have provided soilborne pest and disease control. Microplots were used to study the effects of soil amendments and cropping sequences applied over a 2-year transitional period from conventional to organic tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) cultivation on the incidence of bacterial wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum, purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) reproduction, root galling by Meloidogyne incognita, and soil nematode populations. A continuation of tomato monoculture during the transitional period resulted in a disease incidence of 33%, as compared with 9% in microplots that were rotated with sunn hemp (Crotalaria juncea) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crusgalli var. frumentacea). The benefits of disease control from a crop rotation extended into to a second season of organic tomato cultivation season, where bacterial wilt declined from 40% in microplots with a tomato monoculture to 17% in plots with a crop rotation sequence. Combining applications of urban plant debris with a continued tomato monoculture increased the incidence of bacterial wilt to 60%. During the transition period, tomato plants following a cover crop regime also had significantly lower levels of root galling from root-knot nematode infection compared with plants in the continuous tomato monoculture. Nutsedge tuber production was significantly increased in plots amended with broiler litter but not urban plant debris. Compared with a continuous monoculture, the results illustrate the importance of a systems-based approach to implementing transitional organic practices that is cognizant of their interactive effects on resident soilborne disease, weed, and pest complexes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous tomato monoculture gave a higher bacterial wilt incidence (33%) than rotation with sunn hemp and Japanese millet (9%).

Treatment
tomato monoculturee1
Interactor
Ralstonia solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume2pathogen
Outcome
disease incidencee1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
33%e1
Comparator
rotated with sunn hemp (Crotalaria juncea) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crusgalli var. frumentacea)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“organic tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–460 · show in text ↑
e1

“A continuation of tomato monoculture during the transitional period resulted in a disease incidence of 33%, as compared with 9% in microplots that were rotated with sunn hemp (Crotalaria juncea) and Japanese millet (Echinochloa crusgalli var. frumentacea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–904 · show in text ↑
e2

“the incidence of bacterial wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–528 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop rotation reduced bacterial wilt from 40% to 17% in the second season of organic tomato cultivation.

Treatment
crop rotation sequencee3
Interactor
Ralstonia solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume2pathogen
Outcome
bacterial wilte3
Direction
declinede3
Value
17%e3
Comparator
a tomato monoculturee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“organic tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–460 · show in text ↑
e2

“the incidence of bacterial wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–528 · show in text ↑
e3

“where bacterial wilt declined from 40% in microplots with a tomato monoculture to 17% in plots with a crop rotation sequence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining urban plant debris with continued tomato monoculture increased bacterial wilt incidence to 60%.

Treatment
applications of urban plant debrise4
Interactor
Ralstonia solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume2pathogen
Outcome
incidence of bacterial wilte4
Direction
increasede4
Value
60%e4
Comparator
a continued tomato monoculturee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“organic tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–460 · show in text ↑
e2

“the incidence of bacterial wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–528 · show in text ↑
e4

“Combining applications of urban plant debris with a continued tomato monoculture increased the incidence of bacterial wilt to 60%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1285 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato plants following a cover crop regime had significantly lower root galling from root-knot nematode than plants in continuous monoculture.

Treatment
cover crop regimee5
Interactor
root-knot nematodeMeloidogynee5pest
Outcome
root gallinge5
Direction
lower levelse5
Comparator
continuous tomato monoculturee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“organic tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–460 · show in text ↑
e5

“During the transition period, tomato plants following a cover crop regime also had significantly lower levels of root galling from root-knot nematode infection compared with plants in the continuous tomato monoculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1287–1504 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutsedge tuber production was significantly increased in plots amended with broiler litter but not with urban plant debris.

Treatment
broiler littere6
Interactor
Nutsedgee6weed
Outcome
Nutsedge tuber productione6
Direction
significantly increasede6
Comparator
urban plant debrise6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“organic tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–460 · show in text ↑
e6

“Nutsedge tuber production was significantly increased in plots amended with broiler litter but not urban plant debris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1506–1623 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend a systems-based approach to implementing transitional organic practices that accounts for their interactive effects on soilborne disease, weed and pest complexes.

Outcome
systems-based approach to implementing transitional organic practicese7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“organic tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–460 · show in text ↑
e7

“the results illustrate the importance of a systems-based approach to implementing transitional organic practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1665–1777 · show in text ↑

cover crop · Meloidogyne · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

rotation · Ralstonia solanacearum · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.